Free Essay

Women We Know

In: English and Literature

Submitted By anaraposa
Words 3592
Pages 15
UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DE MINAS GERAIS
FACULDADE DE LETRAS
COMTEMPORARY WOMEN’S WRITING
PROF. DR. SANDRA ALMEIDA
ANA PAULA RAPOSO

Women we know: a biographical critical analysis on Unless by Carol Shields

Belo Horizonte
2013
Sumário

Introduction 3

Men and Women 4

Writers and Readers 7

Goodness 9

Mothers and Children 10

Referências 13 Women we know: a biographical critical analysis on Unless by Carol Shields

Introduction

Unless is the last novel written by Carol Shields, before she passed away of breast cancer in 2003. The novel is structured in a first person narrative; the narrator is Reta Winters, a 44-year old writer and translator. Throughout the narrative, the reader follows a linear chain of thoughts by Reta on the central theme of the novel, which is her quest to find out why her daughter Norah decided to drop out of university and live on the street with a sign on her chest written "Goodness". The essay will be developed through research in primary sources – interviews – in order to analyze Carol Shield’s work using mostly, but not only, her own concepts and reflections on Literature, writing and being a writer, and composition process of Unless. Many scholars have made researches on the novel, especially about language resources, metafiction and gender issues. The most cited work is Nora Foster Stovel’s ““Because she is a woman”: Myth and Metafiction in Carol Shield’s Unless”. By investigating her compositional process in interviews, the intention of the essay is to create an analysis on the novel; the focus of the analysis will be on the preoccupation of showing and perceiving the human conditions, society and the individual, as well as portraying women in a broad range of age. During the late twentieth-century, literary criticism aims towards the critical notions and aspects of Literature, keeping distance from the reflections on the human conditions – that is, Literature students and critics learn first of all what the critics have been talking about a certain work, and not what the work itself is about.[1] This issue is discussed by Tzvetan Torodov in Literature in Danger; the author claims the danger is that the formalist critical approach will distance most readers (the ones who read literature in order to find and give their life meaning). Torodov’s concerns are especially regarding Literature produced in the 20th century filled with metatextual elements. In order to have a new perspective, without having less quality in literary critics, an effective manner of theorical support is by using author’s reflections on their role as writers and their process of composition.[2] Eneida Maria de Souza also reinforces this idea and claims that this type of research “desloca o lugar exclusivo da literatura como corpus de análise e expande o feixe de relações culturais”[3], since biographical criticism is between theory and fiction, document and literature. These primary sources could be seen as a fair way of Literature investigation, social issues, external bonds of a writer’s production etc; and it could also be a means of communication between literary theory and the object itself. Regarding the interview genre, which will receive more focus in the essay, both Eneida Maria de Souza and Rachel Esteves Lima believe that since it is out of the private space of correspondence, for instance, the interviewee assumes a “perfomatic” aspect, which contributes a lot to the image and myths of a given writer.[4] There are different topics being discussed in Unless; on a higher level, though, the reader is constantly presented with several images of women. In an interview given for BookBrowse, Shields stated that Unless is a book “about four things: men and women; writers and readers; goodness; and mothers and children”[5]. Respecting this order, this is how the article will be structured.

Men and Women

The representations of women in Unless comprises a great variety: middle aged, adolescents, mothers, lesbians etc; on the other hand, there are few male characters: there is Tom, Reta’s husband, Mr. Scribano, Reta’s editor; Roman, Reta’s character in her novel on progress, and later on the narrative, due to Mr. Scribano’s death, Athur Springer, her new editor. Reta’s relationship with Tom is discussed in a couple of chapters; they have a stable relationship, they still have sex, they are caring with their daughters, and hitherto, do they love each other? “The question of love is not relevant in our case, not for the moment. The question can be postponed. We live in each other’s shelter; we fit.”[6] Reta Winters was originally Reta Summers, she changed her surname after marrying Tom Winters: “What’s confusing to people is that I’ve taken his name. (…) We could become a standing joke or else one of us could change seasons”[7]. The binary surnames suggests a creation of a ying-yang duo. This notion was identified in the interview for The Guardian, within a reflection on Carol Shields’ previous novels: “with books such as Small Ceremonies, The Stone Diaries, and Larry’s Party, Shields’ speciality has been the subtle ying-yang, the eternal ‘dind-dong’, if you will, of human condition – young and old, happy and sad, confused and determined, male and female.”[8] Even though the idea of men and women being combined in a slight balance crosses Shields’ work, in Unless Reta gives up her surname, that is, gives in on “the traditional submission of the female to the male.”[9] The disappearance of Norah is what triggers Reta to express her thoughts (“but here, in my thoughts, I will register the fact”[10]), transforming them in a sort of feminist manifesto[11], since she agrees with the thesis of her mentor, Danielle Westerman – a renowned writer and academe – that Norah’s condition is a result of her realizing that for men greatness is reserved and for women is only goodness, “goodness but not greatness”[12], says Danielle. This manifesto accompanies Reta throughout the narrative, leading to a preoccupation not only in society, but also in the literary tradition, which makes her write some letters to scholars wanting them to acknowledge women’s existence: “there is not a single woman mentioned in the whole body of your very long article”[13], and “you neglected to mention Danielle Westerman or Joyce Carol Oates or Alice Munro (…). You might have dropped in the Sylvia Plath”[14]. Later in the story, Shields addresses the matters of gender and literary tradition in the passage that Reta encounters her new editor, Arthur Springer. Arthur suggests that Reta publishes her novel under the name of R. R. Summers. She replies to the suggestion: “Using initials though, might make it sound like, you know, that I’m a male writer”[15], Arthur responds that it would not matter because she is “dealing with universal themes” which is “beyond the gendered world”[16], as well as stating that Roman – her novel’s character – should be the focalized character instead of Alicia, her mainly character: “(…) there is the matter of Roman. His interiority. His desire to make a pilgrimage to the land of his fathers.”[17]. The word “fathers” in this context could suggest favoritism for patriarchy. Also, Arthur implies that his suggestions would prevent Reta’s novel from being a light comic novel – as she intended – to be “one of the great books of the new century”[18]. Carol Shields’ statement is relatable to Arthur’s wishes on the change of focus of Reta’s narrative (which would influence the genre) and the changing of her artistic name: “When men write about ‘ordinary people’, they are thought to be subtle and sensitive. When women do, their novels are classified as domestic”[19].

Writers and Readers

The previously mentioned letters by Reta are also a way of connection between writer and reader, in two dimensions. The first one is fictional, in which Reta arguments her unhappiness as a reader with writers that seem to neglect women in their articles. The second one is towards readers in the bigger scale, the readers of Unless, the letters could be interpreted as warnings; it feels like Shields is telling her readers to pay more attention to their own readings, to be more critical of it. Following the idea of warnings to the reader through the story is the idea of suggesting a bibliography for the readers. Reta is constantly making references of authors and book titles and also making strong statements about some of them: “Too much Derrida might be the problem”[20] or in the moment Reta is watching an interview on the TV and the writer was asked about his influences and he responded saying that it was mostly Proust, she thinks: “what’s the matter with this man? Hasn’t he ever heard of Virginia Woolf?”[21], or even “Blame it on Hemingway, blame it on Conrad, blame even Edith Wharton, but the modernist tradition has set the individual, the conflicted self up against the world”[22]. Shields declares having strong affinities with nineteenth-century writers[23], which could be interpreted as an opposition to the twentieth-century modernist texts. The majority of names that the narrator refers are female ones: Alice Munroe and Sylvia Plath, Simone de Beauvoir, Julian of Norwhich, amongst others; as well as making indirect references of feminist texts (The Madwoman in the Attic by Sandra M. Gilbert and Susan Gubar and A Room of One’s Own by Virginia Woolf). It is known later in the narrative that Norah’s condition is due post-traumatic shock, after trying to help a Muslim woman who set herself on fire in the middle of the street. Clues are given to the reader that this is the reason of Norah’s defection, as in the episode of Reta’s regular coffee with her girlfriends, during a conversation about woman and goodness: “And remember”, Sally said, “that woman who set herself on fire last spring? That was right here in our own country, right in the middle of Toronto.” “In Northon Phillips Square.” “No, I don’t think it was there. It was in front of –” (…) But someone did try to help her. I read about that. Someone tried to beat out the flames. A woman.”[24]

As well as using words such as “incinerate”[25] when talking about Norah and when describing her as “an incendiary object”[26]. Also, Reta goes for Norah’s Professor, Dr. Hamilton to get a clue on her disappearance; the Professor tells Reta that Norah’s view on Madame Bovary “was that Madame Bovary was forced to surrender her place as the moral centre of the novel”, and as Nora Foster Stovel mentioned, this is one of the most literary clues to the story[27], since Reta’s new editor wanted her to surrender her fictional heroine Alicia in her novel. Finally, Carol Shields was asked to give a tip to readers so that they would navigate better through Unless, she responded: “ask: Does a reader demand a sense of closure, and what does that mean?”.[28] In order to answer the question, it is necessary to notice that another inner combat of Reta was the sense of ongoingness of life. In several passages she seems confuse about how to proceed with her own life, since Norah’s disappearance was seen as a tragedy, was she supposed to stop her life in order to get closure? Should she move on with her life? Should she stop everything and wait for Norah to snap out of it? She decides then, with helps of her former editor Mr. Scribano, to write a sequel to her novel – that is, she options to move on with her life, she decides to keep going, she options for life’s ongoingness. This notion of ongoingness is presented on the last chapter called “not yet”, which contributes to the idea that closure is not needed for a reader, especially given the last paragraph where life continues with everything in place: Day by day Norah is recovering at home, awakening atom by atom (…). She may do science next fall at McGill, or else linguistics. She is still considering this. Right now she is sleeping. They are all sleeping, even Pet, sprawled on the kitchen floor, warm in his beautiful coat of fur. It is after midnight, late in the month of March.[29]

Supporting this idea, on the interview for The Guardian, Carol Shields claims “For me, endings are never really endings. They’re just there for the shape of the book”.[30]

Goodness

In the same interview, Shields says that another question to be made about Unless is “What has this book done to reinforce my feelings, or, reverse of that, to ruffle my sense of self-worth?”[31]. The process of ruffling the sense of self-worth starts with Reta when she learns about her daughter’s sign: “If I am sincere about achieving genuine goodness in my life and thereby finding a way to reconnect with Norah (…)”[32] Also, it makes Reta ponder about women’s place in society and consequently about herself as woman, writer, mother, housewife, her daughters and her mother and mother-in-law. Goodness leads to ethics. Reta’s girlfriends, thought, have a negative but realistic perspective of goodness: “Goodness is a luxury for the fortunate”[33]. As Stovel mentions, what is being discussed is “the ethical question of whether or not women can constitute a moral centre in life and in literature”[34]. Even though Reta is in a serious quest to dissect goodness, she can’t. Carol Shields admitted also not being able to define it and compared it to modern art: “I don’t know what it is, but I know it when I see it.”[35]

Mothers and Children

Unless deals with the relantioships between mothers and daughters. Reta’s relantionship wit her three daughters are exposed throughout the story – her anxieties, her fears, her content. Besides, there are other mother-daughter relationships in the novel; there is Danielle Westerman (her mentor) who had a bad relationship with her mother and refuses to talk about it; there is her mother-in-law; and there is her own relationship with her mother. Mother-daughter relationship is particularly important in Unless, but it has been a continuous topic in Carol Shields’ work. She declared “I think the saddest thing about my parents’ generation was that a lot of people lived their entire lives without having a proper conversation.”[36] Thereof is the chapter in which questions are raised about her relationship with her daughters and the starting point is when Reta reckons about he fictional characters: should she give them parents? She wonders: “Parents influence children, stiffening or weakening their resolve, and no credible novelist is going to reverse that assumption.”[37] What she does then, is go back to the relationship with her mother, trying to understand hers: “There was nothing hard to hang on to. Any minute I would lose my balance and then I wouldn’t be little Reta anymore. Like Norah, I wouldn’t be anything.”[38] Carol Shields also make revisions using mother-daughter relationship “like so many feminist writers, to emphasize the fact that women have been excluded”[39]. Nine months is the narrative time suggesting the human gestation period; also Norah is at home recovering by the time of the New Year “suggesting a fertility figure – reflecting of the cycle of death and rebirth embodied in the Persephone myth[40].” Persephone was a greek goddess that got married against Demeter, her mother’s will and had to spent a period with her husband in the underworld and a period with her mother on earth. In Unless the revision is due to the satisfactory victory of the mother whom was able to bring the daughter back from the underworld.[41]. A revision of Grimm’s tales Sleeping Beauty and Snow White also appears in order to benefit the mother: “Norah was asleep, with an oxygen tube connected to her nose, Snow White in her glass case, and the girls and I are gathered around the bed like curious dwarves. (…) My darling Norah.”[42]

When the prince is replaced by the mother, Shields is “privileging the mother-daughter bond over the marital union, so that they parallel the Demeter-Persephone myth.”[43]
*
Carol Shields once said that she started writing because she could not find any novels about women she knew[44]. Most of all, Unless is a novel about women, about women writing and about being a woman – a modern woman; “Unless you’re lucky, unless you’re healthy, fertile, unless you’re loved and fed, unless you’re clear about your sexual direction, unless you’re offered what others are offered, you go down in the darkness, down to despair. Unless provides you with a trapdoor, a tunnel into the light, the reverse side of not enough.”

This passage summarizes what it is to a mother, a worker, a housewife, a human being: women we are and women we know.
Referências

ANDERSON, Marjorie. Interview with Carol Shields. In: BESNER, Neil Kalman. Carol Shields: the arts of a writing life. Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada: Prairie Fire Press, 2003.

COMPAGNON, Antoine. O demônio da teoria: literatura e senso comum. 2. ed. Belo Horizonte: Editora UFMG, 2010.

FREITAS, Marcus Vinicius de. O Escritor e Seu Ofício: em busca da Literatura. In: Aletria, v. 20, n. 2. FALE/UFMG: Belo Horizonte, 2010.

POE, Edgar Allan. Filosofia da Composição. In: ____. O corvo. Org. Wanderley Rodrigues Corrêa. São Paulo: Expressão, 1986. p. 5-14.

ROY, Wendy. Unless the World Changes: Carol Shields on Women’s Silencing in Contemporary Culture. In: Carol Shields: The Arts of a Writing Life. Ed. Neil Besner: Prairie Fire, 2003. p. 125-32.

SHIELDS, Carol. “Narrative Hunger and the Overflowing Cupboard.” In: Narrative Hunger, and the Possibilities of Fiction. Eds. Edward Eden and Dee Goertz. Toronto: University Toronto Press, 2003. p. 19-36.

SHIELDS, Carol. 1997 Interview with Carol Shields. [?, 1997]. Oregon: Portal April Henry Mysteries. Entrevista concedida a April Henry. Disponível em: < http://april henrymysteries.com/writing/carol_shields.php>. Acesso em: 27 de novembro de 2012.

SHIELDS, Carol. An interview with Carol Shields: entrevista. [?, 2002]. Saratoga: Portal BookBrowse. Entrevista concedida a BookBrowse. Disponível em: < http://www. bookbrowse.com/author_interviews/full/index.cfm/author_number/764/carol-shields>. Acesso em: 27 de novembro de 2012.

SHIELDS, Carol. From the archives: Carol Shields talks about Unless with Shelagh Rogers: entrevista. [28 de dezembro, 2010]. Toronto: Portal CBC Books. Entrevista concedida a Shelagh Rogers. Disponível em: < http://www.cbc.ca/books/2010/12/from-the-archives-carol-shields-talks-about-unless-with-shelagh-rogers.html>. Acesso em: 27 de novembro de 2012.

SHIELDS, Carol. Human Shields: entrevista. [28 de abril, 2002]. Londres: Portal The Guardian. Entrevista concedida a Barbara Ellen. Disponível em: . Acesso em: 27 de novembro de 2012.

SHIELDS, Carol. Unless. Toronto: Random House, 2002.

SOUZA, Eneida Maria de. Crítica cult. Belo Horizonte: Editora UFMG, 2002.

SOUZA, Eneida Maria de; MIRANDA, Wander Melo (Orgs.). Crítica e coleção. Belo Horizonte: UFMG, 2011.

SPIVAK, Gayatri Chakrovorty. Pode o subalterno falar?. Belo Horizonte: Editora UFMG, 2010.

STOVEL, Nora Foster. “Because she’s a woman”: Myth and Metafiction in Carol Shields’s Unles. In: ESC: English Studies in Canada, V. 32, Issue 4, December, 2006. p. 51-73. Disponível em: . Acesso em: 7 de dezembro de 2012.

TODOROV, Tzvetan. A literatura em perigo. Trad. Caio Meira. São Paulo: Difel, 2009.

-----------------------
[1] TODOROV, Tzvetan. A literatura em perigo, p. 26-27.
[2] FREITAS, Marcus Vinicius de. O escritor e seu ofício em busca da Teoria da Literatura, p. 190.
[3] SOUZA, Eneida Maria de. Crítica Cult, p. 111.
[4] LIMA, Rachel Esteves. A Entrevista como gesto (auto) biográfico. p. 41.
[5] SHIELDS, Carol. An interview with Carol Shields: entrevista
[6] SHIELDS, Carol. Unless, p. 184.
[7] SHIELDS, Carol. Unless, p. 56-57.
[8] SHIELDS, Carol. Human Shields: entrevista.
[9] STOVEL, Nora F. “Because she’s a woman”: Myth and Metafiction in Carol Shields’s Unless, p. 57.
[10] SHIELDS, Carol. Unless, p. 60.
[11] STOVEL, Nora F. “Because she’s a woman”: Myth and Metafiction in Carol Shields’s Unless, p 63.
[12] SHIELDS, Carol. Unless, p. 115.
[13] SHIELDS, Carol. Unless, p. 165.
[14] SHIELDS, Carol. Unless, p. 164.
[15] SHIELDS, Carol. Unless, p. 282.
[16] SHIELDS, Carol. Unless, p. 282.
[17] SHIELDS, Carol. Unless, p. 283.
[18] SHIELDS, Carol. Unless, p. 283.
[19] SHIELDS, Carol. Human Shields: entrevista.
[20] SHIELDS, Carol. Unless, p. 4.
[21] SHIELDS, Carol. Unless, p. 100.
[22] SHIELDS, Carol. Unless, p. 121.
[23] ANDERSON, Marjorie. Interview with Carol Shields, p. 65.
[24] SHIELDS, Carol. Unless, p. 118.
[25] SHIELDS, Carol. Unless, p. 179.
[26] SHIELDS, Carol. Unless, p. 213.
[27] STOVEL, Nora F. “Because she’s a woman”: Myth and Metafiction in Carol Shields’s Unless, p. 68.
[28] SHIELDS, Carol. An interview with Carol Shields: entrevista.
[29] SHIELDS, Carol. Unless, p. 320.
[30] SHIELDS, Carol. Human Shields: entrevista.
[31] SHIELDS, Carol. Human Shields: entrevista.
[32] SHIELDS, Carol. Unless, p. 37.
[33] SHIELDS, Carol. Unless, p. 115.
[34] STOVEL, Nora F. “Because she’s a woman”: Myth and Metafiction in Carol Shields’s Unless, p. 62.
[35] SHIELDS, Carol. From the archives: Carol Shields talks about Unless with Shelagh Rogers.
[36] SHIELDS, Carol. Human Shields: entrevista.
[37] SHIELDS, Carol. Unless, p. 140.
[38] SHIELDS, Carol. Unless, p. 140.
[39] STOVEL, Nora F. “Because she’s a woman”: Myth and Metafiction in Carol Shields’s Unless, p. 56.
[40] STOVEL, Nora F. “Because she’s a woman”: Myth and Metafiction in Carol Shields’s Unless, p. 58.
[41] STOVEL, Nora F. “Because she’s a woman”: Myth and Metafiction in Carol Shields’s Unless, p. 55.
[42] SHIELDS, Carol. Unless, p. 301.
[43] STOVEL, Nora F. “Because she’s a woman”: Myth and Metafiction in Carol Shields’s Unless, p. 69.
[44] SHIELDS, Carol. Human Shields: entrevista.…...

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Life as We Know Ti

...English 101 17 September 2012 Life as we know it: The Importance of Organ Donation William James, an American psychologist and philosopher, once said, “The great use of life is to spend it for something that will outlast it.” November 21, 2010 stated out excellent, but then was turned upside down. My uncle was trying to get a hold of my mom and dad, when he finally called me to tell me that my grandpa, my dad’s father, had died that morning from having a heart attack in his car while he was at the farmer’s market. “What?” I questioned him, “What are you talking about, I just talked to him last week!” There was no time to think, I immediately started to cry, as if my whole world just came crashing down. I kept thinking to myself, how am I going to tell my dad that his father just died. Since my grandparents lived in Florida at the time, my family packed our bags and headed down there for the memorial service. Crying every night, I was confused, heartbroken, and mourning the loss of the first close family member that suddenly dies. When we arrived in Florida, my dad’s four brothers were there, along with his two sisters, and their children while we attended the funeral, supporting one another. Although my grandpa was cremated, all of his organs and skin were donated to help people in need or for research, as he had a skin disease. When my grandma told me that he had helped many people because he donated his organs, I surprisingly felt a little bit of satisfaction that......

Words: 1082 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Life as We Know It

... geography, paleontology, and biology. This distinctive breadth remains a hallmark of anthropology today. As cultural anthropologist E. R. Wolf (1964) noted over 50 years ago, anthropology uniquely bridges the gulf between the sciences and the humanities. At the same time, there is a long-standing tension between humanistic and scientific approaches in anthropology that can fracture the discipline. For example, in 1998, Stanford University’s anthropology department split into two departments: “anthropological sciences” and “cultural and social anthropology.” They merged again in 2007, rejoining the scientific and humanistic aspects that characterize the discipline as a whole. The humanistic aspect of anthropology stems from our desire to know and understand other cultures. Anthropologists with a humanistic orientation approach the study of cultures as translators who try to make the symbols of one culture understandable in terms of those of another. They attempt to portray and interpret the customs, values, worldview, or art of one culture so that they can be appreciated by readers accustomed to a different language and way of viewing life. While much of culture exists in the symbolic realm of ideas—the beliefs, feelings, and ideologies that can be studied and interpreted for their own sake—there is also a practical aspect of culture that makes it possible for a people to survive physically. Each culture, as a system of common understandings, serves as a form of social......

Words: 15839 - Pages: 64

Premium Essay

Why Didn't We Know

...Why Didn’t We Know? Table of Contents Problem Identification ……………………………………………………………….…… 3 Ineffective Communication Ineffective Listening Abilities Ineffective Development of project team Situation Analysis …………………………………………………………………….…… 4 Ineffective Communication Ineffective Listening Abilities Ineffective Development of project team Recommendations ………………………………………………………………………..... 6 Ineffective Communication Ineffective Listening Abilities Ineffective Development of project team References ……………………………………………………………………………..…... 8 Problem Identification In the Harvard Business Review Case Study, “Why Didn’t We Know?” Ralph Hasson describes circumstances where communication, listening, and the development of a sales team could have greatly circumvented a lawsuit against the Galvatrens Company. Three of the problem areas that affect this case are, ineffective communication skills, ineffective listening abilities, and the ineffective development of the sales team. Ineffective Communication Engleberg & Wynn identifies communication as an instrument used by members of a group to share information and opinions, make decisions, solve problems, and develop interpersonal relationships. (Engleberg & Wynn, 2013, p. 5). The managers and employees of Galvatrens lack these communication skills and have caused major issues throughout the organization. In this article, it shows Galvatrens lacking in......

Words: 1494 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Tell the Women We Are Going

...------------------------------------------------- Tell the women we‘re going – assignment … “What you do that for?” Bill said. Jerry looked at him, and smiled. His pupils were small and prickly. “What you do that for?” Bill repeated. “Oh, come on,” said Jerry “They were playing with us. Making us think they were going to fuck us, and then changed their minds!” Jerry said. He tossed the bloody rock off the cliff, and started to walk, smacking his hands together. Jerry said, “Well, are you coming?” Bill said, “Where are you going?” “Heading back to the car” Said Jerry. “What about them? We’re just going to leave them?” asked Bill. “Sure, those two whores are good for nothing. Unless you like them dead as well” said Jerry. He just kept walking. Bill was still standing by the girls, but when Jerry was out of sight, Bill ran after him. When they came down Jerry picked up one of the girls bike. Bill said, “What are you doing?” “A present for Linda” Jerry said. He smiled. Bill just looked at Jerry They sat in the car. Jerry in the driver’s seat, and Bill in the passenger seat. They didn’t say a word to each other on their way home. Bill looked at Jerry once. Jerry’s eyes were crazy. He was driving very slowly. When they got back home, Jerry parked the car. Suddenly he looked normal to Bill. His eyes had no longer that spark of insanity; they were calm as ever. “What are we going to do?” Bill asked. “About what?” Jerry said, looking at him, and then he walked in......

Words: 337 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

We Have Right to Know

...30 September 2013 We have the right to know The era that we now live in is so big that farmers are using Genetically modified foods (GMO) to help make more produce for the society("20 Quotes About”). There are benefits from GMOS but there are also consequences of the GMO’S. The only thing they tell you about the GMOS is the side effects that are not harmful to the body. They make the produce taste and look better than the organic foods that do not have the GMOS on it. The people deserve the right to know if the food is being genetically modified or not. The first thing I want to address is the benefits of the GMOS. The GMOS help farmers produce more product and they help kill the weeds that grow in the fields. Some people are saying that they GMOS help the body absorb some the vitamins we need in are body to make are body healthy ("PolicyMic."). Fourteen states have now tried to legislated a law that shows which foods are genetically modified and the risks that involves the food modifications. California is trying to follow the legislation in becoming the fifteenth state. People say we do not need to know what is modified or not because the food we eat no matter what has bacteria on them ("PolicyMic."). Henry Miller pointed out that the GMOS help crops grow in harsh environments produce less water and less carbon oxide ("PolicyMic."). The GMOS help produce cheaper food in huge amounts and in a suitable manner. Companies do not want the consumers to know about the......

Words: 1117 - Pages: 5

Free Essay

We Women Warrior Reflection

...In Colombia's war-torn indigenous villages, three brave women from distinct tribes use nonviolent resistance to defend their peoples' survival. Warfare between the guerrillas, paramilitary groups, and armed forces endangers Colombia's 102 aboriginal groups, dozens of which face extinction because of the conflict. Despite being trapped in a prolonged conflict financed by the drug trade, indigenous women are resourcefully leading and creating transformation imbued with hope. Doris is a young Awá tribal leader who takes charge to protect a group of internal refugees fleeing combat between the army and the guerrillas. While speaking at a U.N. press conference in Colombia’s capital, she learns that five people from her village were slain by masked men. Despite the risks, Doris returns to her village. She continues leading the vulnerable Awá people whose living, growing coca leaves, which are the base for cocaine, makes them targets for the U.S. funded fumigations. Doris is determined to defend her people and end the violence by speaking out. Ludis is a Kankuamo widow, and mother of three, who is framed and imprisoned on false charges of rebellion. After a year, Ludis is released from prison. She returns to her village and forms a weaving collective with other female victims of the systematic murders perpetrated by paramilitary bands. Later, Ludis confronts her husbands’ killer and spares her sons from perpetuating this cycle of violence. Flor Ilva is the first woman entrusted......

Words: 308 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Do We Really Know Anything?

...really know anything? With reference to Descartes’ first meditation justify your answer in full and respond to possible objections. A belief is any opinion or any view whether you are committed to the view or not. Thus, if you know something, you are entitled to believe in it. The subjective nature of knowledge partly is based on the idea that beliefs are things that individuals have and those beliefs are either justified or not justified (Pardi, 2011). However, Descartes notices that over the course of his life, he has from time to time accepted false beliefs and the falsity of these beliefs have influenced other beliefs. Thus, Descartes aim in his first meditation is to find out if what we know is truly correct (Blackburn, 1999:15). Once we have figured out what beliefs are beyond any possible doubt, it is suggested that we can use reason to deduce the rest of what is knowable (Pardi, 2011). There are three conditions when one can say they know something is true (Pardi, 2011). Firstly, you believe in something, secondly, it is in fact true and lastly you are justified in believing a statement is true. Of course it is possible that there are no complete unshakeable truths, it is also possible that we might discover that our prejudices cannot be detached or that the beliefs we think are our grounds for all our other beliefs are not really ultimate at all. For this reason, it is why rationalist say that knowledge comes from within, the only beliefs we can really know......

Words: 1630 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

Why Didnt We Know

...be any senior officer Completely, even if not committed to ethical conduct He generates a great deal of shareholder value. The consequences of inappropriate behavior Objectionable. However, by calling for an all- CEO leadership without consulting day return Director Arch Carter has crossed the line Their responsibilities and the management of the tween. An all-day retreat is an extraordinary event Outside directors are the same, especially if Participants. The causes and risk staff To wonder whether other stakeholders The CEO has the confidence of the board. Instead retreat, the directors of the holding Personally, we want to be, "as the chip should tell Assuring that elections must follow our Code of Harry Hose in the future, and we want to know what If you do not, you're going to do. " Directors It should also make clear that they will support Actions to strengthen compliance with the CEO No matter ethical practices, what impact it May have on the profitability of companies....

Words: 606 - Pages: 3

Free Essay

Life as We Know

...Leah Duong Professor Butcher ENG 260-1: Writing Essays November 6th, 2014 Life As We Know It was another typical summer day for her: work in the morning and getting off at noon. It was hot that day, around mid-80 degree Fahrenheit, but at least, she was in Colorado and not Ohio, where she went for college. The humidity in Ohio bugged her so much. She hated how sweaty she got just from walking to classes. The stickiness of the body made her uncomfortable just being in her own skin. However, all that did not matter at that moment because she was soaking wet, actually, they were soaking wet. Her younger brother, Bobby, worked with her at the pool. They work as lifeguards and gave swim lessons. She taught four classes that day. The students all ranged from three to six year old. There was, particularly, this little boy around the age of five who would not stop splashing water at her and the others, which was a handful to deal with, but she soon got that situation under control. Fair to say, Lindsey had always been good with children; that was why she wanted to go for Early Education. Just two more years, and she would start living her childhood dream. It had been a long morning, for both her and Bobby. She hushed him to drive faster. She could not wait to get home, to lay on her queen size bed for the rest of the day. Her stomach started to growl. Thinking about it, she hadn’t had a chance to put anything into it yet. To her surprise, there was an opened box of chewy......

Words: 1564 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

Why Didn't We Know?

...A whistle-blower’s lawsuit alerts Galvatrens to deep flaws in its system for uncovering misconduct. How should management and the board respond? HBR CASE STUDY Why Didn’t We Know? by Ralph Hasson COPYRIGHT © 2007 HARVARD BUSINESS SCHOOL PUBLISHING CORPORATION. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. It was 9:30 in the evening of what had been a very long Friday when the phone rang in Chip Brownlee’s home study. On the line was Arch Carter, the lead director of Galvatrens, the Houston-based consumer products company that Chip had led as chairman and CEO for the past ten years. “I just got your voice mail,” Arch said. “The parts about a lawsuit and accusations that we manipulated our sales numbers certainly got my attention. What’s going on?” “At this point, I don’t know much,” Chip responded, “but I wanted to give you a heads-up. A former divisional sales manager has filed a lawsuit against the company, charging he was wrongfully terminated because he tried to report an illegal scheme to inflate sales.” Chip had received a copy of the lawsuit that afternoon. As he’d read through the complaint, he’d gotten a whole new perspective on the multiple departures that had rocked Sales dur- ing the past four weeks. The plaintiff was Mike Fields, who had left Galvatrens three weeks earlier. He claimed that he’d come across a plan devised by Greg Wilson, another divisional sales manager. According to Mike, Greg had proposed shipping goods to a few of his bigger customers, billing them, and booking the......

Words: 3262 - Pages: 14

Premium Essay

Why Didn't We Know

...Case #1 – Team ACT Contributors: Leroy: ineffective development of an effective project team ASSIGNMENT:  Case Analysis – Why didn’t we know, by Ralph Hasson.   DESCRIPTION:  This case study will provide an analysis of the problems and the mechanisms leading up to the accusations against Galvatrens.  Galvatrens is a US based consumer products company.  The company discovers a significant problem within their sales department via a whistleblower that has been fired.  Through this study we will examine the communication breakdown and identify key instances of failure.   Problem Identified -A project team should include managers and team members with interpersonal skills, training and team building to enhance the team’s performance throughout the project (PMI, 2008, p. 232). The sales team for Galvatrens was not successfully developed. There were several flaws in the initial structure of the sales team, the management plan and execution, which led to inefficient management. Situation Analysis -The chain of command within Galvatrens directly affects the development of the sales team. The hierarchy of management has the COO responsible for daily operations, including the sales team, which is not consistent throughout all operations (Hasson, 2007). The next dilemma is with the CEO, Chip Brownlee. He follows the ill advice of the senior vice president of HR, Dale Willis. Dale believes that if something is outside the management’s chains of command it can allow a problem......

Words: 667 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Tell the Women That We Are Going

...Analysis of "Tell the women that we are going" The narrator in "tell the women that we are going" is a third person omniscient narrator with Bills point of view½. I can sees that it is a third person narrator form Bills point of view on page 222 line 28" Bill was thinking how Jerry was getting to be deep, the way he stared all the time and hardly did any talking at all." Here I get a clear example of that the point of view is from Bills perspective. That will say that we know all about what Bill is thinking, felling, his background, see and do. All of this is shown in the shot story, a example is on page 221 first line to line 6 same page, another example is on page 226 line 36 and the following two sentences. Where I get to know what Bill are thinking about the two girls. The narrator do not describe the persons outer in detailed, but the physical environment is describe in more detail, for an example on page 225 line 34 where a mountain is describe, " a hundred yards off the road was a high, sloping, black mound of rock, part of a low range of hills, honeycombed with footpaths and small caves, Indian sign-painting here and there on the cave walls.". The third person narrator do not present Bill thoughts directly, but throw what Jerry is telling and what the person is telling as a narrator. Beside the indirect thoughts I also hear some of the dialogues between Jerry and Bill. In the short story there is two main character, there is Bill and Jerry. Bill is the point......

Words: 1274 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Do We Really Know Everything

...Religion is a subject that both fascinates and intrigues me. Supposedly we are here in this life for a very short time, relatively speaking, from which our eternal destiny is determined. If such is the case, this issue then is the only matter of any real importance and that importance is of such magnitude that all else pales in comparison. Yet we are left without definitive, unambiguous instructions from God as to how to live this life to assure just what that destiny is. Now, I know, any Christian who reads this is jumping up and down to point out that the Bible is God’s word and is very clear on the subject. Yet the statement is preposterous when you recognize the amount of diversity within the religion. It seems rather obvious to me that if God had intended to give His “word” to man He would have made it clear and unambiguous and would have made it equally available to all mankind rather than to a select few with reliance on them to disperse it to the remaining majority, especially when the myriad of groups dispersing it cannot agree on what it says. It seems to me that this idea of evangelism or ‘spreading the word’ is in contradiction of the belief itself. It implies that the salvation of the lost is the responsibility of the saved to ‘let them know’. It seems to remove the responsibility of knowing God’s will from God and place it upon His chosen. It suggests that many people are lost because the ‘saved’ can’t or don’t for whatever reasons make all the rounds. Where is...

Words: 4282 - Pages: 18

Premium Essay

How Do We Know?

...Intro to Philosophy 11 January 2016 How Do We Know? ”How do we know? This is a very intriguing question once you really think about it. How do we acquire knowledge? How do we know something to be true? Is it through experience or does it come from another realm in which we previously inhabited? Is everything we know and will learn in the future already mapped out for us? Throughout history man has sought out to answer these deeper questions and through philosophy they have begun to open their eyes to the universe in which we live. Answering question after question each philosopher perfecting the former theory and all of it leading up to the ultimate question the purpose of life. Epistemology is a form of philosophy that comes from the greek word for knowledge “episteme” and “logos” meaning explanation (chaffee 229) this encompasses the nature of knowledge and justification. It is through epistemology and metaphysics that philosophers attempt to othe answer questions like: can we ever really know anything? what is the difference between belief and knowledge? Can there be different “truths” for different people. or is “truth” the same for all? Pre-socratic philosophers used these ideas to lay the foundation for philosophy as we know it today. Plato, a student of Socrates, and as an ancient Greek philosopher he not only preserved Socrates teachings for future generations but also contributed original ideas on a wide range of issues such as morality, politics, metaphysics......

Words: 1390 - Pages: 6

Free Essay

Tell the Women We Are Going

...working couple. They were a happy couple, but now and then they felt alone as if the circle of life has passed them by. The Millers had these neighbors named the Stones that lived across the hall from them. The husband Jim worked as a salesman for a machine-parts firm, where he managed to combine business with pleasure trips. Harriet and Jim Stone was that couple that was very outgoing and easy to get along with, they would always entertain people at their house. On this particular occasion, the Stones were planning a two weeks trip to Cheyenne and then St. Louis to visit relatives. “ Have fun”, Bill said to Harriet. “We will”, said Harriet. “You kids have fun too” (Carver 117). The Millers were envious of the Stones because they were going on a two week vacation and the Millers felt has if they deserve to go on one. “ Well, I wish it was us,” Bill said…. “God knows, we could use a vacation,” Arlene said (Carver 117). They really wished that it was them going because every time the Stones go on vacation they visit different states and countries, they Millers would like to explore different things outside their apartment.......

Words: 322 - Pages: 2