Free Essay

Policy and Legislature Family and Consumer Science

In: Social Issues

Submitted By Nutribird
Words 3725
Pages 15
Policy and Legislature that affect Family and Consumer Science
Birdie Bell
December 11, 2014
Dr. Lynda Martin


Family and consumer sciences are an important academic discipline that students in most of North America take as a humanity subject (Brotherson & Duncan, 2004). The aim of this paper is to identify the policies and legislation on families in the United States and consumer science and examples will be used to illustrate these clearly.
Federal and State laws on Families The United States Supreme Court has long made a pronouncement that the family law belongs to the individual states within the nation’s federalist system. Even if the federal government has as well undertaken regulation of issues that affect families, initially in a sporadic manner and then in a more consistent manner, the Court has made an affirmation of the primary role of the state in defining family. A large number of commentators show of appreciation of this authority allocation, presenting an argument that that it plays an important role in promoting family pluralism by showing to honor to local values and choices. However, others point out that federalism creates “equality by design” (Laura, 2014, p. 1835). Therefore, a large number of commentators present an argument that deference to states play a role of insulating courts and federal agencies from the disorderliness of family life, thus demeaning the family relationships’ significance, devaluating children and women, and improperly emphasizing the divide between the private and public spheres. The critics also point out that the assigning of the family law to states complicates the many ways that the family is already implicated in several substantive areas of the federal law, encompassing the law of individual liberties and tax law (Laura, 2014, p. 1836).
In spite of such criticisms, the Supreme Court went on deferring to the definition of states of family in 3 recent cases that concern definition of family for the federal law purposes. In “Astrue v. Capato”, the Supreme Court upheld, “the Social Security Administration’s use of state’s intestacy laws to determine whether posthumously conceived twins qualify as ‘children’ for purposes of federal survivors benefits” (Laura, 2014, p. 1836). The term that followed, the Supreme Court turned to the other half of the child-parent relationship, making an assumption that the definitions of the state of “parent” were applicable to a challenged adoption under the federal “Indian Child Welfare Act”. The in the U.S v. Windsor, the Supreme Court put stressed that the state authority and power over marriage as an issue of tradition and history in making a ruling that, “The provision of the federal Defense of Marriage Act defining marriage between one man and one woman unconstitutionally excluded same-sex marriages, recognized under some state’s marriage laws, from federal benefits”( Laura, 2014, p. 1837). Although the Supreme Court did not make a decision explicitly about this case basing on the federalism grounds, each holding reiterated the assignment of the Court of family position to the states. The family pluralistic definitions thus persist even while the federal government distributes benefits increasingly to, and inflicts a burden, on the family members.

In “Astrue v. Capato”, a mother looked for the “federal Social Security survivors” benefits for the twins she had conceived by utilizing the frozen sperms of her husband. Just before he died, the husband had taken an initiative of depositing his sperms in the sperm bank with expectation of his upcoming treatment for the esophageal cancer he was suffering from. This couple had conceived a child in a natural way while the husband was undergoing his chemotherapy treatment. However, the husband succumbed to cancer before they could have their second child. From there, the wife went through vitro fertilization, delivering twins one and a half year after the death of the husband. It was undeniable that the twins were actually the biological kids of the late husband. The first child was qualified for “Social Security survivors” benefits after the death of his father. The mother looked for the same benefits for her twins, but the “Social Security Administration did not accept her application. Appealing a definitional provision of the “federal Social Security Act”, the Agency made a ruling that, “the twins would qualify for benefits only if the intestacy law of the husband’s domiciliary state recognized the twins as his legal children” (Laura, 2014, p. 1838). Since the death of the husband occurred in Florida, and the law of Florida has recognition of the after-born children as being heirs only if their conception occurred before the death of a decedent, the Agency drew a conclusion that the twins were actually not “children” and hence, not eligible for benefits. Following this conclusion, the mother made an appeal in the federal court. The district court had agreed with interpretation made by the Agency of the Social Security Act. This was reversed by the Third Circuit, finding that, “the undisputed biological children of a deceased wage earner and his widow qualified for survivor’s benefits as a matter of federal law, without regard to state intestacy law” (Laura, 2014, p. 1843). It reasoned that the invocation of the “Social Security Act” of the state intestacy law is effective only “when a claimant’s status as a deceased wage-earner’s child in doubt” (Laura, 2014, p. 1843). Since all parties were in agreement that the applicants are the biological children of Capatos, this Court established that it was needless to make application of state law (Laura, 2014). A unanimous Supreme Court did not agree to this. Making a keen analysis of the interplay of a number of the Social Security Act’s provisions, the Supreme Court drew a conclusion that that the Agency was logical in requiring the applicants for the survivors benefits to be able to meet the “child” definition “under the relevant state’s intestacy law or under the three, relatively narrow definitions of a child otherwise set forth in the Act” (Laura, 2014, p. 1850). Since the mother of twins did not invoke at least on the criteria, the Supreme Court drew a conclusion that these twins could only receive the benefits if they were able to meet the “child” definition based on intestacy. In reaching the conclusion, the Supreme Court regarded and refused to accept the position held by the Circuit that it was needless to undertake a child’s status each time the applicant is a married couple’s child. This Court stressed that interpretations like these depends on words that are not found in federal law, is consistent with Restatement and dictionary definitions of a “child”, unsuitably promotes of both marriage and biology in undertaking determination of parentage and offers no time limits on a qualifying birth of a child (Laura, 2014).
A large number of commentators have been criticizing this outcome, stressing that neither the federal nor the state law has been able to keep up with the changes occurring in the reproductive technologies. These commentators clearly make an assumption that all children conceived posthumously should be handled alike for the federal benefits’ purposes, but do not give an explanation why uniformity is required. Indeed, these critics tend to make an assumption that a law that is developed in a better way will as well be a more uniform one. However, “if the pluralism underlying federalism retains any value, then the Capato Court appropriately deferred to states’ definitions…and this general deference to states’ authority by no means anomalous when deference to state’s authority by no means anomalous when determining who counts as family” (Laura, 2014, p. 1851).
Single and LGBT parent families have to struggle in life without the support of the government on health and other aspects of life. This is because of the education, health and housing policies in place that do not consider such families. However, there are those that criticize the government for providing funds for citizens claiming that this aid weakens the family structure by removing self-reliance and creating a dependency nature among citizens. All these new ideas came about with the new age of Functionalists, who believe that welfare destroys independence. According to functionalists, these welfare donations in the form of food stamps, welfare gifts, Medicare, and housing allowances cause irresponsibility (Hogarth, 2002). A man, for instance, may abandon his responsibilities as a father if he realizes that the state is supporting the child. If, however, the man had no support, he would work hard and ensure that he gives his child all the support he or she requires. Housing provision for teens is becoming a common phenomenon in the US, which according to these people, leads to the uncontrolled teenage pregnancies. There are a number of people in the US who call upon the government to assist them, and since it does, the do not see the need to work (Hogarth, 2002). They sit back and wait for the government's assistance instead of working and making their money. However, the Functionalists do support the government's aid on the traditional family structure through tax allowances. They believe that these support systems encourage the unity of the family and hence increase responsibility among people. Child support agencies, however encourage irresponsibility by allowing a man to be absent from his child's life only to send money.
Recently, however, the government has enforced new policies in many states that are making it possible for other types of family such as single parent homes and LGBT families to partake of government favors (Kanter, 1977). Moreover, there have been changes in the adoption system making it in such a way that these people (single parents and LGBT) can adopt children. Even more recently, people cohabiting have received the right to adopt a child as well. In the past, only heterosexual couples married. The government policies have also affected these families by using various incentives to encourage adoption of children. These include the use of welfare policies and minimum wage taxation policies on families that adopt a child in order to encourage more people to do so. The policy helps in the distribution of resources among the poor orphaned children.
The recent changes in welfare and child policies have received both negative and positive reactions. The positive reactions are that these steps have led to acceptance and equality. In traditional society, a single parent and especially a single mother was considered a disgrace to the society. People misjudged these women for “cheap” and unethical for sleeping with a man she is not married to (Brotherson & Duncan, 2004). Moreover, belonging to the LGBT society was a huge embarrassment. However, with time, single mothers became more and more common and were eventually accepted in society. The latter however remained a controversial topic for a long time.
In fact, there are people today that have still not accepted the LGBT community and discriminate openly against them. As for the critics, they believe that placing a child in either a single parent or LGBT society will lead to their psychological and social defects (Hogarth, 2002). They believe that these families are dysfunctional and unnatural. Therefore, they will instill in the children whether consciously or otherwise, the dysfunctional qualities. In fact, some of them argue that these families produce juvenile delinquents through wrong exposure for the children.

States have been defining marriage, being specific as to who may qualify to have the status and establishing the terms and conditions for exit. Up to the time the “Defense of Marriage Act” or DOMA, was passed in 1996, the federal government almost entirely deferred to the determinations of states of which person was married and who was not, even for federal law’s purposes. DOMA instituted a drastic departure from such practice, propagating independent definitions of “spouse” and “marriage” for the entire federal purposes. DOMA made specification that, “in determining the meaning of any Act of Congress, or any ruling, regulation, or interpretation of the various administrative bureaus and agencies of the United States, the word ‘marriage’ means only legal union between one man and one woman as husband and wife, and the word ‘spouse’ refers only to a person of the opposite sex who is a husband or a wife” (Laura, 2014, p. 1852). In “U.S v. Windsor”, the DOMA’s constitutionality was challenged by a surviving spouse after she was not able to make claims for the federal estate tax exemption offer to surviving spouses since she had entered into marriage with another woman. The Second Circuit and district court drew a conclusion that the plaintiff was eligible as a surviving spouse under the New York law, where there has been domiciling of the couple and the husband’s death. However, although her marriage had been recognized as being valid under the state law, the living same-sex spouse was supposed to pay $363,053 in the federal estate taxes, which “a similarly situated surviving mixed-sex spouse would not have been required to pay” (Laura, 2014, p. 1853). Eventually, the Supreme Court made a ruling in favor of the surviving couple, drawing a conclusion that DOMA’s main effect in make identification of a subset of the state-sanctioned marriages cause them to be unequal, thus serving to violate the fundamental due process as well as equal principles that are applied to Federal Government. In a similar way as the Capato Court, Windsor Court didn’t explicitly have reliance on federalism in arriving at its holding. Rather, the Court eventually drew a conclusion in a 5-4 opinion that “DOMA was motivated by an improper animus or purpose” (Laura, 2014, p. 1854). Even if the Windsor Court didn’t frame the decision in made in the federalist terms, this Court had heavy reliance on the authority of the state in defining marriage (Laura, 2014, p. 1854).
The laws and policies that govern marriage tend to favor or benefit only the couples that are legally married according to the US law (Hogarth, 2002). Cohabitants and single parent families may not enjoy the benefits that the government allows to “ideal” families. For instance, the government gives them higher allowances on taxes. Moreover, when cohabiting couples go to the government in assistance in “divorce”, they have a harder time since the government does not recognize these families. The division of property during separation, therefore, becomes a nightmare for these couples, as the government tends to ignore these pleas.
The argument of functionalists on the effect of policies on families is that the state acts in favor of the society's interests and thus assists the people (Hogarth, 2002). They believe that the country use these policies to protect its citizens and assist them towards a better life. The argument is however debatable seeing that the government is more inclined towards the traditional definition of ideal families. It means that many of the resources that the government offers society only benefit such families.

Unlike a large number of foreign jurisdictions, the U.S lacks an outstanding, comprehensive code of consumer protection. The United States Consumer protection law is rather a patchwork of the state and federal laws. Such patchwork is basically a product of the United States’ federalism that undertakes allocation of sovereign powers to state as well as federal governments. However, it is as well as function of the state and federal government’s fragmentary approach to the consumer protection legislation. For that reason, consumer protection law in the U.S isn’t so much a unified law body because it is a jumble of distinct state and federal laws (Crane, Eichenseer & Glazer, 2011).
The federal consumer protection law gives a reflection of piecemeal Congressional attempts to offer protection to the consumers. Instead of enacting overarching or comprehensive consumer protection laws, Congress has been passing several distinct laws that target specific industries, consumer products, and business practices. The most important of these laws deal with deceptive or unfair business practices such as the “Federal Trade Commission Act”, drugs and food such as the “Drug, Food and Cosmetic Act”, the household goods such as the “Consumer Product Safety Act” and the financial services and products such as the “Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act” (Crane, Eichenseer & Glazer, 2011, p. 306).
The “state consumer protection” law is found to be not any less complex. As on one hand each state has been enacting laws that prohibit deceptive or unfair business practices, on the other hand, the evolution, scope, and enforcement of such laws vary from one state to the other, in a considerable manner. Moreover, the state “common” law may provide hurt consumers an additional protection layer. The consumer protection law in the U.S is distinctive in its federalist complexity as well as reliance on the class actions (Crane, Eichenseer & Glazer, 2011).
The government applies various policies in trade in order to ensure that it achieves a desired outcome, which is to control the options of citizens. This means that government policies create barriers or limits to consumers in order to prevent an undesirable outcome. The government policies on both local and international trade play a major role in the lives of individual families' consumer habits. The major reasons for government participation in trade are to create revenue as well as to protect the consumers (Brotherson & Duncan, 2004). The taxes imposed on imports are a major source of revenue for the government. The higher the taxes on imports, the more expensive these products are once they get into the country in order to cover the cost of tax. International trade has a great impact on civilians since many countries depend on imported products to survive.
The prices of commodities are regulated by the government through the tariffs (taxes) that companies pay to import their goods as well as a producer who passes on the cost to the consumer (Kanter, 1977). Most states in the U.S regulate prices in such a way that the imports are more expensive than the local products. The reason for this is to promote local trade by “encouraging” people to use local goods rather than imported goods. This greatly affects the purchasing power of the locals hence ensuring that the vast majority purchase the local products. Moreover, the government also tries to reduce the importation of goods that are readily available as a way of eliminating competition.
The unfortunate issue about this is that the local products are often very expensive in order to keep the products in the market. This in turn becomes a burden to the consumer as they struggle to make ends meet. The policies protecting goods producers affect the consumers negatively since they are sometimes unable to make ends meet. Consequently, the government is forced to assist its citizens by giving away food stamps to help them pay for goods (Brotherson & Duncan, 2004).
The ever-increasing prices of goods and services are because of the high taxes the government demands from producers. As a result, producers overprice their goods in order to pass the cost of tax to the consumers. These policies determine the meals on a large number of Americans' tables as they can only afford a certain range of products. Additionally, the government is forced to regulate prices in order to protect consumers. Some of the areas where citizens suffer are in the case of monopolization (Brotherson & Duncan, 2004).
In years past, the government allowed monopolistic business people to determine the cost of goods and services (Brotherson & Duncan, 2004). This led to an outcry among American citizens especially at a family level. In such cases, the poor suffer most, as they cannot afford to buy even the basic commodities. The regulation of the process by the government however attempts to protect the consumers, and that means that the manufacturers must produce more goods and services. The point of doing so is to ensure that they do not incur losses per unit of production through small-scale production.
The impact of government policies in trade are felt at the family unit level. When a country does not import unnecessary items, which is items available locally, there is creation of job opportunities (Meier, 1987). As a result, the family leaders, usually the parents, can provide for their family. The availability of basic needs is crucial in a family setup as it determines the provision of all other needs whether emotional or psychological. Moreover, finances enable the parents to take their children to better schools and hence give them a chance to have a better future. The consumer behavior patterns affect his or her ability to run or manage a home properly. Circumstances such as tension and stress due to lack and want lead to great frustration in a family setup. Moreover, the parent or leader of that home is usually in a physical and emotional state that makes them insensitive to the needs of others.

The policies and legislation on families, both at federal and state level, affect each citizen of the country in terms of marriage and children welfare among other family issues. Considering the side of considering on the side of consumer protection, international trade, for instance, can determine the availability of the product to residents as well as the price of the same. If import taxes are low, the product prices will be lower making them readily affordable to citizens. On the other hand, if they are high the product becomes a luxury hence promoting local trade and market prices. Consequently, the government policies determine consumer behavior both directly and indirectly.

Brotherson, S. E., & Duncan, W. C. (2004). Rebinding the ties that bind: Government efforts to preserve and promote marriage. Family Relations, 53 (5), 459-468.
Hogarth, J. M. (2002). Financial Literacy and Family and Consumer Sciences. Journal of Family and Consumer Sciences: From Research to Practice, 94(1), 14-28.
Kanter, R. M. (1977). Work and family in the United States: A critical review and agenda for research and policy. Russell Sage Foundation.
Laura, R. (2014). Federal Visions of Private Family Support. Vanderbilt Law Review, 67(6), 1835-1870
Meier, K. J. (1987). The political economy of consumer protection: An examination of state legislation. The Western Political Quarterly, 343-359.
Crane, E. M, Eichenseer, N. J. & Glazer, E. S. (2011). U.S. Consumer Protection Law: A Federalist Patchwork. Defense Counsel Journal, 78(3), 305-330.…...

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Examine the Ways in Which Law and Social Policy Affect Family Life

...Examine the ways in which laws and social policies affect family life. There are many different ways in which laws and social policies affect family life. Laws and social policies affect different cultures. In Russia a new policy was introduced in 1917, the new Communist Government wanted to destroy the patriarchal family structure; the patriarchal family structure was seen as an obstacle to true communism and socialism. The Russian Government changed these laws to make abortion and divorce easier for men and women, equal rights for women was also introduced as well as communal nurseries that were provided by the state. The goal of the changed laws was to break down the traditional family in order to give people more freedom and to reduce the inequalities that were produced between the rich and poor. As a result of this the traditional family did break down, there was a rapid increase in divorce and abortions, as people began to search for the ‘ideal’ freedom and equality. The Government realised that things were beginning to become chaotic so there was a policy change. The government took drastic action by tightening divorce laws and making abortion illegal. The government also said that parents who had more children were awarded allowances. China’s population control policy was introduced under the intention to reduce the population in an over-crowded country but also to save society. China’s workplaces planning communities’ controlled the women employees menstrual cycle......

Words: 734 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Examine the Ways in Which Social Policies and Laws May Influence Families and Households.

...Currently, in the UK, the family is a fairly unregulated sphere of life, compared with different societies such as China. Laws and social policies in Britain today tend to encourage or discourage certain types of families, rather than actively enforcing them like China’s one child policy. Government agencies and institutions only seem to take an active role on policing areas of family life when things are perceived to have gone wrong, such as regulating the fair distribution of assets following the breakdown of a marriage. Most current social policies in the UK come from a New Labour perspective, as this party have been in power for almost 12 years. Therefore, many of these current social policies encourage the existence of the family, although not just in the nuclear form endorsed by the New Right. For instance new labour modified the law so that unmarried cohabiting couples, both heterosexual and homosexual, had the right to adopt on a basis equivalent to that of a married couple. This has made adopting easier for unmarried couples with fertility issues, but the biggest change to have resulted from it is that homosexual couples can now, fairly easily, adopt children, leading to a much more diverse range of families. This change has been heavily criticised by New Right thinkers, who claim that it further undermines the nuclear family, by removing the restriction on unmarried couples from adopting children. They also claim that, due to not being raised in the......

Words: 875 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Examine the Way Social Policies Affect the Family

...which way social policies have an impact on family. A social policy is an action or plan adopted by the government to overcome problems or weaknesses in society, as discrimination, racism and poverty. It is usually based on laws, which provide the framework for agencies to follow. A good example of social policies are the one adopted by William Beveridge in the 1940's, after the Second World War, trying to fight the five "giant evils" of after war Britain, such as poverty (Want), unemployment (Idleness), bad housing (Squalor), not efficient educational system (Ignorance) and bad health care (Disease). Although social policy is a general term which does not refer only to programmes on family, social policies always can affect households, either directly or indirectly. For example a direct policy on family can be any law regulating marriage (such as the Divorce act, 1969, or laws on same sex marriage,while indirect ones affect other aspects or istitutions of society which, however, are linked to family or at least to certain members of the household. (E.g. Policies on education have a crucial impact on children socialization and therefore on their approach to other member in any institution of society) Besides, social policies are indicative of current ideological tendencies in society, since they help family institution to achieve a social accepted asset. As an example New Right perspective perpetrates a conservative view on family, assuming that nuclear family model......

Words: 681 - Pages: 3

Free Essay

California’s Paid Family Leave and Implications for Federal Policy

...Of all industrialized nations, the United States is the only country to not have a law granting paid family leave for mothers’ with a newborn. It was not until 1993, did the U.S. enact the Family and Medical Leave Act which allows workers time off to: bond with a newborn child; treat their own serious health condition; or care for a family member with a serious health condition. The intent for FMLA is to allow workers to balance family life with job obligations, but without wage replacement, many are unable to afford unpaid time off. Further, FMLA’s eligibility requirements exclude a substantial portion of the working population, primarily part-time, temporary, and vulnerable low-wage workers. Some states, such as California have taken action to ameloriate these pitfalls through paid family leave programs using state temporary disability insurance funds. California has been a frontrunner in many public health initiatives including being the first state to provide a comprehensive Paid Family Leave (PFL) program with “a wage replacement requirement for the time parents take to bond with a newborn or adopted child” (Cohen, 2011, p.2 ). This analysis will further examine California’s paid family leave program including its’ provisions, strengths, weaknesses, and its’ overall potential to be used as a template for future federal policy. Limited leave taking in the United States is largely a result of the eligibility restrictions for job-protected leave under FMLA and the......

Words: 1819 - Pages: 8

Free Essay

Texas Legislature Assignment

...The Texas Legislature: Following the Journey of S.B. 21 and H.B. 25 S.B. 21 After a journey of just over four months, S.B. 21 was signed into law by the Governor on June 14, 2013. S.B. 21 requires the Texas Workforce Commission to implement a policy requiring certain individuals applying to receive unemployment benefits be drug tested as a condition of the program. Not all applicants would be required to submit to drug testing, but those individuals that were previously employed in occupations predetermined by the United States Department of Labor as requiring pre-employment drug testing would be required to comply under the new law. Furthermore, any individual receiving unemployment benefits that is rejected for employment due to failing a pre-employment drug screen will also become ineligible to receive benefits. However, a failed drug-screen is not meant to permanently bar any individual from receiving benefits. One may provide proof of physician prescribed medications that may have caused the failure or proof of being presently enrolled in a drug-treatment program to regain benefits. After a period of one month, the individual may also complete another drug test, and pending negative results, would regain their benefits (Texas Legislature Online). Texas follows in the footsteps of Mississippi and Kansas in taking advantage of the provisions included in the Middle Class Tax Relief and Job Creation Act of 2012 that allow the state governments to drug-screen applicants to...

Words: 1589 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

Examine the Ways Which State Policy Effect Families and Households.

...New right ideology has always viewed state policy as the reason why the traditional family institution is in decline in Britain today. Whether this is an accurate reflection on state policy will be assessed in this essay. Functionalists have always had a traditional view on family ideology where there is a clear segregation of tasks between the man and the women which is seen as natural or God given. But through the introduction of government policies in order to cater for the changing image of the family, functionalists feel that this is causing the nuclear family as an institution to be in decline. They believe that the 1960s and the 1970’s was a big turning point for the decline in familiar ideology as the state introduced policies such as the legalisation of abortion which was seen as women lessening their commitment to the family and the availability of the contraceptive pill. This introduction had a significant effect on the family as it undermined the family as private institution where important decisions could be made. Other policies such as the role of social workers through the local government, as discussed in item B were “if social workers feel that the upbringing of children is not provided properly children could be temporarily or permanently taken into care”. This has an effect on the nuclear family in particular because it means that the family’s privacy is undermined. Functionalists such as Howard argue that the state and the media have made marriage have......

Words: 911 - Pages: 4

Free Essay

Rural Families, Industry Change and Social Capital: Some Considerations for Policy

...dilemmas for families and communities as they attempt to adjust to the social consequences of rapid industry change. Drawing on a social capital perspective and a case study of 12 Westland families, this project examines how rural families bring balance to aspects of the three actions defined by Arendt as being essential to “the human condition”: family, work and community life. The findings reveal significant insights into how social capital is effectively reproduced in times of change. These insights are discussed in terms of their social policy implications. Fifty years ago Hannah Arendt (1958) published The Human Condition. In this work she contended that there are three types of action required to be “fully human”. The first two of these actions, engagement in family life and paid work, are necessary for human existence in contemporary society. The third action she called vita activa, or public life: a life that is actioned within jointly built civil spaces. Within these spaces we are capable of debate, we share actions and we resolve collective dilemmas (Arendt 1958). Arendt reminds us that the absence of, or over-attention to, any one aspect of the human condition is likely to be problematic. A half a century on from Arendt’s original thesis, public policy continues to debate aspects of vita activa and democratic governments still seek to engage vita activa in economically and socially productive ways. Working out the shifting balance between family life, paid......

Words: 2696 - Pages: 11

Premium Essay

Family Demographic Shifts and Their Policy Implications

...Family Demographic Shifts and Their Policy Implications Changing Patterns: Since the 1960s, the structure of the average American family has become increasingly unstable as a result of major demographic changes. Marriage rates have fallen over the last few decades while divorce rates have remained high. At the same time, the percent of non-marital births in the U.S. has risen steadily, from approximately 5% in 1960 to 41% in 2011. In addition to this instability, family structures are becoming increasingly complex as rising numbers of single parents pursue new partners and have more children. Importance: The potential negative impacts of these shifting demographic patterns upon the well-being of children are of particular concern to policy makers. Surveys indicate that children living in single parent households are more likely to live in poverty than children living in married households. According to the 2010 Current Population Survey (CPS), only 9% of married-couple families with children lived in poverty while 41% of single-mother families with children did so. Children born to unmarried parents also experience greater instability and complexity in family structure as a result of the shifting relationships of a parent. Over 30% of children born into single-parent households experienced 3 or more partnership transitions by a parent. Policy Implications: Strong correlations between parental marital-status and child well-being seem to encourage policies......

Words: 576 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Examine the Ways in Which Social Policies Affect Family Life

...which social policies affect family life A social policy is a law implemented by the government to benefit society. Most social policies will affect families in some way or another. There are 2 types of policies, direct and indirect. A direct policy has a direct and immediate affect on the family, and an indirect policy is other policies not directly aimed at families but may still have an affect on them. Social policies have attempted to promote the nuclear family, such as those introduced by New Labour and the Conservative government, although New Labour are more accepting of family diversity. The New Rights ideology has influenced government policies. They argue that policies have weakened the nuclear family leading to family diversity and more problems for family members. The New Right have the view that social policies should avoid doing anything that might undermine the 'natural' and self reliant nuclear family and will often criticise many government policies for undermining the family by providing over generous welfare benefits e.g. council housing for teenage mothers. The New Right argues that social policies like the legalization of abortion and the availability of the contraceptive pill is the beginning of family decline. They also state that equal opportunities and equal pay lows distract women from their 'natural' career as a mother. The New Right feel that policies like this is causing a decline in the traditional nuclear family, resulting in the family not......

Words: 1065 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Policy on Family policies affect family life. (24 marks, 14 AO1, 10 AO2) A social policy is a law implemented by the government to benefit society. These social policies have attempted to promote the nuclear family, such as those introduced by New Labour (although they are more accepting of family diversity than conservatives) and the Conservative government. The Child Support Act supports the conventional family by making the father provide for his children, even when he is absent - thus reinforcing the natural role of the breadwinner. Changes to taxes in 1988 also tried to reinforce the conventional families by not allowing cohabiting couples to claim more tax than married couples, and prevented them from claiming mortgage relief as two people, meaning married people are better off with their taxes. Maternity and paternity leave also reinforce the conventional nuclear family type, as maternity leave is far longer than paternity leave; this assumes that the mother is the primary caretaker of the child (this is not the case in Sweden, where both parents are treated as equal caretakers and income earners). Both New Right and New Labour are in favour of the nuclear family because they view it as the best way for a child to be adequately socialised. The New Right view the division of labour as natural and based on biology; when these roles are fulfilled the family will become self-reliant and not have to rely on the state for support. New Labour also support the nuclear family as......

Words: 852 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Evaluate the Impact of Government Policies and Laws on Family Life in Britain (20 Marks)

...Evaluate the impact of Government policies and laws on family life in Britain (20 marks) Social policies are the measures taken by state, or Government, bodies such as schools and welfare agencies. They are usually based on laws introduced by Government. Laws and policies can have both direct and indirect effects on the family. There are many Government policies that can either benefit of have a negative impact on the family. These come from many different movements in Government, such as: New Right, New Labour and Coalition - these can be criticised by different types of sociologists such as Marxists and Feminists, which I will be expressing throughout this essay. The New Right have a Functionalist view on the family. They believe strongly in the advocation of the nuclear family and the other family criteria that they present, such as - as presented by the sociologist George Murdock - A heterosexual couple as part of a nuclear who engage in a socially acceptable sexual relationship, economic cooperation (or being self-sufficient) and provides basic functions such as socialisation, discipline and morality. The “Child Support Agency” was enforced in 1993, and forced natural fathers to provide for their own children financially in the event of a parental split. The Government fund this agency to ensure that the child is financially supplied to ensure good health and quality of life as they grow up. The impact that this had on the family is that the biological fathers......

Words: 873 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Assess Sociological Views of the Impact of Government Policies and Laws on Family Life.

...Assess sociological views of the impact of government policies and laws on family life. There are many different views of how government policies and laws affect family life among different sociological theorists. Some view government policies as positive whereas some see the impact as positive. Feminists argue that many government policies promote the patriarchal family and reinforces the women’s economic dependence on a man. Policies such as tax benefits and maternity leave are seen as negative policies as they promote the ideology of women being the main childcares in a relationship. Women are entitled to 9 months maternity leave whereas men are only able to receive 2 weeks paid paternity. Consequently, this means women are forced to be the parent that stays at home to look after the child as a couple would not be able to have financial stability if the man stayed at home for 9 months without pay. The new right also do not support these policies however for different reasoning. Feminists have a negative view on policies that insinuate that they have to care for their elders, as they believe the role of a caregiver to the sick and elderly should be shared between men and women equally and should be a women’s obligation. Although feminists are against laws that enforce the inequality between men and women they support policies that allow women to be independent from a patriarchal relationship, for example the divorce reform act and working tax credits. The divorce......

Words: 723 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Policy Papaer

...The Policy Process Throughout this paper we are going to cover the healthcare policy process. Policies are constantly reviewed and gone over to ensure that people receive the best healthcare possible. Each one has the potential to affect each of us on a daily basis, so careful consideration must be given when policies are proposed. It is important to understand the process of how a topic eventually becomes a policy. We are going to look at the three stages that a policy goes through before it is implemented. So let us get started we have a lot to cover. Formulation Stage A national health research policy should be formulated based on the national health policy, which in turn should conform to overall national development plans. The research policy system within which health research policies are formulated, is actually very broad. Three variants have been defined for general policy, although these rarely exist in a pure form4. These variants can also be applied to the health research policy system.   * A unicentric health research policy system in which one authority (generally the government) is responsible. The result is a regulated system in which the government allocates funds and coordinates tasks. * A multicentre health research policy system, essentially a marketplace, in which many autonomous actors (research institutions and organizations) compete for the development of policy, which is attuned to the requirement of each research institution or...

Words: 1515 - Pages: 7

Free Essay

Examine the Approach and Policies of Governments Towards Families

...Examine the approach and policies of governments towards families During the period 1945-1970’s the government attempted to develop the welfare state by adopting an approach that was highly interventionist. Over the last fifty years, the state has changed considerably. It has gone from being a ‘big’ state in years between 1945 – 1970, to a state which gives minimal state support in the years between 1980 and 1990 and an enabling state from the years 1997 -2010. The welfare state is a social system whereby the state assumes primary responsibility for the welfare of its citizens, as in matters of health care, education, employment, and social security. A social policy is simply a proposal or an initiative that is put into practise by a political party or a government that relates to any area of social life, and in this case the family. One policy the government introduced was the welfare state. The welfare state was introduced by Attlee’s government after their election victory in 1945, in response to the Beveridge Report of 1942. Beverigde was a British economist and social reformer who were closely associated with the development of the welfare state. The welfare state was created by the labour government to end poverty and look after everyone from the ‘cradle to grave’. The main parts of the welfare state included NHS, child benefits, job seekers allowance, and pensioners for elderly, education, state housing etc. The government’s purpose was to actively intervene......

Words: 1783 - Pages: 8

Premium Essay

Examine the Ways in Which Laws and Social Policies Affect Family Life.

...Sociologist and political groups all have different views of social policies, some believe that they are a good way of achieving something and others see them as bad because they may only support one view point and not others. To start of here is the definition of a social policy; it is an action, plan or programme that the government puts in place that aims to deal with a problem or achieve a goal. These social policies are mainly based on laws, which provide the framework for agencies to follow. The first social policy that will affect the family is marriage. There are different laws in place to discourage certain behaviour inside marriages, a few examples of these would be; marriages must be monogamous where only one person can be married to one person at one time, in the UK it is illegal to marry or have children with your brother/sister but is legal to marry and have children with your first cousin, etc. Laws like these would have an effect on a family as having an affair on your partner is illegal and therefore if this happens then the marriage may breakdown and may end up in a divorce. Divorce is another social policy that will have an effect on the family. Divorce was granted legal in 1857 but it was very hard to get one up until the late 1960’s which made divorce become more popular as it was easier to declare. However, a divorce can only be granted if one of the following applies; Adultery – when one partner has a sexual relationship with another whilst in a......

Words: 1038 - Pages: 5