Philosophy in Humans

In: Philosophy and Psychology

Submitted By blubbus
Words 418
Pages 2
The Value of Philosophy in Human Existence

Philosophy is actually a “system of beliefs regarding reality” (Landauer & Rowlands, 2001) that performs an extremely important part in the development of human’s activities as well as responses to a specific topic, particularly in coping with human existence. People take advantage of philosophy by explaining the sense of the world. Various theories are on hand and more theories are to be discovered. Therefore, these theories let an individual to observe the world in different points of views, providing different ideas and letting a person to develop her or his own standards that can help him make the most efficient decision for his self.

Thinking and making a decision on one’s future education as well as career is much more logical through philosophy. Having a philosophy in life helps in having a better perspective of what one desires to trust in, what one desires to follow and where path one needs to go. Philosophy is in great correlation with morals as morals provide a person a concept on what you must do in a specific situation and why a person should do it. Additionally, philosophy also helps in finding out one’s self.

The primary value of philosophy is reasoning as well as questioning the facts of the world such as why one performs a thing and why one doesn’t. According to Bertrand Russell, “The person that has no tincture of philosophy undergoes life caught in the prejudices derived from…habitual beliefs of his era or his nation” (Carroll, n.d.). Philosophy opens up doors and windows which result in continuously liberate man’s mind from specific beliefs passed down by their forbearers by finding out one’s understanding of the world.

The significance of philosophy lives in every individual’s wish to get knowledge, know and uncover the secrets of the world. This further result into invention, growth as…...

Similar Documents

Philosophy

...epistemology is very important because it can relate to many other philosophical disciplines. Ethics Ethics is dealing with values relating to human behavior, with respect to the rightness and wrongness of certain actions and to the goodness and badness of the motives and ends of such actions. Ethics is associated with the conception of morality. The experience that I encountered with ethics is in my last job. I was elected to be component of a team for a project. A coworker had issues with me because I knew that his work was not satisfactory and he asked other coworkers to do his job. The ethical thing that I could have possible done was to report his actions. Ethical morals are important and if the person cannot complete his assignment individually it’s an ethical violation. If someone was in a higher position, then that person should know his responsibility in that position and not ask another coworker to complete the tasks that were assigned to him. Political Philosophy Political philosophy is a major study area of philosophy. Searching for problems and solutions is political philosophy; the burdens that are problems for societies at that time are researched so that a solution can be addressed properly. One major area of study under the broad umbrella of philosophy is political philosophy. Political philosophy is always searching for a solution to the problems that burden societies of that time. From the Ancient Greeks to the modern day Americans, there......

Words: 1341 - Pages: 6

Philosophy

...Andrade 1 Andrew Andrade Mr. Barker Philosophy 101 9 February 2011 Word count: 2049 PHILOSOPHY Many people believe that philosophy is a subject meant for those who are lost in life. Its actually the opposite those who do not study philosophy are lost in life. In our everyday lives philosophy can be applied from our hygiene to our relationships. It is based on the questioning of every aspect of life to better gain an understanding of it. The better understanding of something can allow us to change the bad for the better or add to the good if need be. The big questions in philosophy are about the existence of god, our own existence, morality, ethics, reality, life’s meaning, and knowledge. All question have an ultimate goal to end pain and suffering whether it be in life or death. There have been many philosophers who believe that they have figured out the solution to suffering in life and death. They came up with guidelines and philosophies that would help people to be good morally in turn be good for all of mankind. Siddhartha Gautama, K’ung-fu-Tzu, and Lao Tzu all believed that their own ways were the most effective. Buddha was born into a royal family who believed in the traditional teachings of the Hindu religion. It involved reincarnation, karma, Brahmin priesthood, sacrificial system, and the caste system. With god and goddess, the better you do in a previous life the better your next life......

Words: 2117 - Pages: 9

Philosophy

...Philosophy Philosophy is the study of general and fundamental problems, such as reality, existence, knowledge, values, reason, mind, and language. Discussed in this paper will be the most prominent individuals in each time period and their ideas, starting with the “Pre-Socratic” philosophers and ending in the era of post modernism. The time period in ancient Greece between the end of the seventh century B.C. and the middle of the fourth century B.C. is what is known as the “Pre-Socratic Era”. The thinkers known as the “Pre-Socratic Philosophers” used the four basic elements (water, earth, fire, and air) as their foundations for their ideas. Thales and most of the other Pre-Socratic philosophers limited themselves mostly to inquiring the nature of existence, being, and the world. They were mostly Materialists, believing that all things are composed of material and nothing else, and were mainly concerned with trying to establish the single underlying substance of which the world is made up. They used this idea of “Monism” without resorting to supernatural or mythological explanations. To these men even the commonest of phenomena like lightning, water freezing to ice, and natural disasters would have appeared miraculous. Empedocles, first of the pluralists, who proposed that reality, is composed of an irreducible plurality of elements. He also documented the first theory of evolution. Democritus developed the extremely influential idea of Atomism (that all of reality is......

Words: 2667 - Pages: 11

Philosophy

...Read chapter. 1 of Philosophy of Religion: Thinking About Faith, “What is Philosophy of Religion?” As you read, make sure you understand the following points and questions: Explain the distinctions between philosophy of religion and sociology, history, theology, and religious philosophy. philosophy of religion focus on the truth and reasonableness of religious beliefs. While the historian or sociologist may study religious beliefs, but his focus is not specifically on the truth or reasonableness of such belief theologian looks at religous beliefs from within, as an adherent or representative of a religous tradition. philosophy of religon may be engaged in by thinkers who are not religous at all, as well as by committed religous thinkers philosophy of religion not so much religious thinking as it is thinking about religion. Religious Philosophy is Religious thinking Explain the arguments for and problems with fideism. Fideism: human beings are never religously neutral; they are always either in faithful service to or in rebellion against God. Claims that faith is the precondition for any correct thinking about religion Problem: fideist cannot attempt to win over his critics by rational argument as the presupposition of such dialouge means the possibility of common ground (fideists deny common ground) eliminates the possibility of showing the nonbeliever the superiority of a religous worldview where should one place one's faith? What 2 factors do Evans and Manis...

Words: 299 - Pages: 2

Philosophy

...Surname Instructor Course Date Survey of Mexican Philosophical Thought The philosophy of the Mexicans is a production of philosophers from ancestries from Mexico, residing either within or outside the country. The general philosophy surfaced with the introduction of the first school by the Spanish conquerors, with teaching and publications on philosophical treaties. As such, it is critical to deny that these thinkers got education from the European schools, making it quite impossible for Hispanic thinkers to express the sense of racism in their works. In addition, Hispanic-American thought intellectuals rarely produce original profiles because there elements originate from the elements and motifs originally designed for the European thought. Meanwhile, philosophy and religion plays a critical role in ancient civilization, culture creation, and preservation in the sense that they not only bind, but also influence the societal structure, statutes, and personal lives. This paper documents the Mayan culture taking into consideration their civilization, ideologies, as well as their rituals. Civilization Factors contributing to culture creation and preservation extend from geographical to a number of patterns. The origin of the Mayan culture from the central part of America gives the perfect example of socio-cultural effects, which even after several years, continue to exist. The review of Mayan gods, as well as their conquest by the Spanish holds......

Words: 634 - Pages: 3

Philosophy

...PHI130 Mind, Meaning, and Metaphysics DALILE, Boushra Rationalism vs. Empiricism: A Deficient Distinction Epistemology is the branch of philosophy concerned with the nature and scope of knowledge. It explores how knowledge can be acquired and considers its limits and validity. Rationalism and empiricism are distinct epistemological schools of thought. Among others, they differ significantly regarding the source of concepts and ideas. Prominent rationalists, including Descartes, Spinoza and Leibniz, argue that one must rely on reason as a purely deductive process to attain justified truths about reality (Cottingham 1988). In contrast, empiricists, including Locke, Berkeley and Hume, argue that knowledge is derived from the role of experience and sense data to formulate ideas. The question of what is the ideal foundation of knowledge is still debatable to date. I will argue that the rationalist vs. empiricist distinction is not exhaustive, and that carefully considering the approach-discipline relationship is crucial. In order to support this claim, this essay will discuss differences between rationalism and empiricism. Next, it will closely examine the advantages of each, drawing on the works of René Descartes and David Hume. Finally, this essay will identify problems with both theories and argue that reason and experience can together generate factual knowledge with respect to the subject matter. The major difference between rationalism and empiricism concerns their......

Words: 1768 - Pages: 8

Philosophy

...Everyone seems to have a philosophy on life – what would be the point of living everyday without some absolute, underlying purpose to existence? When there is an unknown in life, man manifests a comfort for the sole purpose of security. This has been true throughout time whether it be philosophies about nature, religion, etc. The fact is that we do not like having unknowns in our life; we don’t like having variables. Man has been engaged in a relentless pursuit of knowledge of himself and his surroundings from day one; we have made some incredible advances in science because of it. However, beyond the realm of science, mostly composed of hard facts and theories, there lies spirituality – why are we here? Who or what created us? Is there a God? What is the universe? What exactly is the human condition? And once these questions are answered, how should we live our lives? I only wish constructing a life philosophy was that simple; these questions have tormented man interminably and without a shred of relief. It is an endless game, coming up with the answers, and is often comprised of one step forward and two steps back. It is also equally difficult for me to put together a life philosophy because I am only sixteen years old. Only after seventy or so years of experience, can one accurately assess what he has learned along the way. Life continues to present itself to me as ambiguous as an E.E. Cummings poem, as random as the ocean waves. However, in this essay I will attempt...

Words: 542 - Pages: 3

Philosophy

...University of Phoenix Material Metaphysics Matrix and Essay Part 1 Matrix: Analyze metaphysics in philosophy by completing the following matrix. Provide a definition of the branch of philosophy as given in a philosophical source (the readings, supplemental materials, or outside academic sources) and list a minimum of three historical developments, theories, key contributors, and principal issues. Bullet point answers are acceptable. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | ...

Words: 632 - Pages: 3

Philosophy in Human Persons

...Philosophy 2500 – Jaden Phan – 7:45 – 9:00 am. The clues of mental phenomena and its mystery Philosophy of human persons is always a difficult question for humankinds. We are the highest form of animals equipped with supreme functions. We not only have soul which is the principle of life, but we are also believed to have mind or consciousness which is much more functional, divine and peculiar to the soul. But often times, we are unaware of what we are having and how our body operates in our daily life. Therefore, many philosophers, psychologists, religionists or even mathematicians, and sciences have been actively trying to define the nature, attributes and affections of our brain/soul. There are many different views and perspectives on the soul and the mind-body problem, such as materialism, physicalism, dualism, mysterianism and so on… So, how exactly do we understand humankinds, and all living beings as a whole? How exactly do we understand our own self? Do both material and immaterial parts exist? If so, how do they relate to each other? Although most of these questions have convincing answers, I believe we are still in the mystery of defining the true nature of mental phenomena. (1) Thomas Nagel said that: “Conscious experience is a widespread phenomenon. It occurs at many levels of animal life, though we cannot be sure of its presence in the simpler organisms...” His main thesis is that fundamentally an organism has conscious mental states if and only if there is......

Words: 2479 - Pages: 10

Philosophy

... Date Ethics Ethics is a general term used to stress on the character role and the moral philosophy instead of people just acting so that they can bring real consequences. Aristotle is the father of the virtue ethics, and he concluded that the people who have ideal character traits were virtuous. However, once these characters are established, they need to be nurtured so that they can become stable. For instance, a moral person is kind in very many circumstances during his or her lifetime because that’s how her personality and will simply do her duty without expecting any favors. Virtue ethics shows focuses on how people should live, which the real social are and the family value and also what the best life to live is. The show Sons of anarchy is very interesting because of the way William Shakespeare Hamlet has inspired it. For instance in the play, Jackson has virtue values whereby he is trying to maintain peace with the violent gang. The virtue ethics values have three main categories that include; the care ethics, eudemonism, and the agent-based theories. The human ability to perform the distinctive functions well is equated with human flourishing that is based on eudemonism. Eudemonia means happiness and the well-being of the human. Human will always revenge to get their happiness. For instance in the show Sons of Anarchy, the retaliatory sense becomes a menace to the peace in the society. Jax is...

Words: 2397 - Pages: 10

Philosophy

...1: Philosophy, sophism/sophistry, “pilosopo” 1 [Published in Rolando M. Gripaldo, ed. 2004. Philosophical landscape. Manila: Philippine National Philosophical Research Society.] PHILOSOPHY, SOPHISM/SOPHISTRY, “PILOSOPO” Rolando M. Gripaldo PHILOSOPHY: Ancient Philosophy literally means “love of wisdom.” In contemporary philosophy there are as many definitions of philosophy as there are schools of philosophy.1 What is interesting is that one school defines philosophy to the exclusion of other schools. For instance, the analytic school defines philosophy as the clarification of the meanings of words, phrases, and sentences, and it rejects metaphysical propositions as cognitively meaningless. Its emphasis is logic and language. On the other hand, the continental school defines philosophy in terms of the meaning of life and one’s relationship with the world and the Other (other human beings and/ or God). It considers the activities of the analytic tradition as meaningless to one’s life. Its emphasis is life. It is therefore advisable to just leave the definition of philosophy in its original etymological meaning, although even this is not safe. Quite recently, Hans-Georg Gadamer (1989), an hermeneute, has rejected epistemic wisdom as within the realm of human control. The ancient Greeks defined philosophy as love of (epistemic) wisdom. Thales, who is traditionally considered the father of philosophy, was interested in “knowing” the ultimate reality,...

Words: 3853 - Pages: 16

Philosophy

...god, an impersonal power, or both. The concept Is now well-defined, and religious scholars have had a difficult time deciding whether T’ien was believed to be a force like fate or a personal identity. It is also unclear whether the ancient Chinese believed T’ien responded to human supplication or simply worked in accordance with the principles of T’ien. | God created human beings and everything. | Monotheism, belief in one God, is the most important and foundational concept in Islam. Muslims believe in one God who created the universe and has power over everything within it. He is unique and exalted above everything. He creates, and His greatness cannot be compared to His creation. | Man | Men had the dominant role in public life in ancient Greece. They were engaged iin politics and public events, while women were often encouraged to stay in the home. | For the Chinese then, Philosophy is the translation of words into action or the application of theory into praxis. Thus for the Chinese, philosophy singles out a person to live on what he says/teaches thus, a man/woman of integrity who has word/s of honor. | In Hindu tradition, Manu is the name accorded to a progenitor of humanity being the first human to appear in the world in an epoch after universal destruction. | He has been created to live on it only for a probationary period, and, in due course, he will return to his Lord, to be judged according to the way he has spent that period. | World | | | | Babor (2007)......

Words: 1762 - Pages: 8

Philosophy

...APPLIED TO CARL SAFINA’S DISCUSSION ON VARIOUS NONHUMAN ANIMALS In this paper, I intend to explain Martha Nussbaum’s capabilities theory for treating nonhuman animals ethically, then apply this theory to Carl Safina’s discussion of various nonhuman animals in his book Beyond Words, How Animals Think and Feel. Martha Nussbaum is an American Philosopher, who focused on philosophy in the field of moral theories. She is a distinguished Professor of Law and Ethics at the University of Chicago. Her interests include the ancient Greek, ethics, political philosophy, Roman philosophy, feminism and animal rights. Her works include various books either as an author or an editor. Carl Safina is a philosopher who explored the inner feelings of the animals in his book Beyond Words. This paper will apply Nussbaum's philosophy to the Carl Safina's discussion that demonstrates that animals have feelings, and describes their cognitive nature. Thus, they are aware of the mistreatment, only that they are powerless to resist the abuses. He elaborates the communication abilities of the elephants, whales, and other animals. We, human beings consider ourselves superior to the others, but by various measures, we are the most “frequently irrational, distortional, delusional, worried.” Many people who oppose the harsh treatment of animals cite Martha Nussbaum’s capabilities theory. His approach advocates for the better treatment of animals and recognition of their rights as cognitive beings. This......

Words: 1463 - Pages: 6

Philosophy

...700, Albany, NY 12207 Production, Laurie Searl Marketing, Fran Keneston Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Mason, Richard, 1948– Understanding understanding / Richard Mason. p. cm. — (SUNY series in philosophy) Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 0-7914-5871-7 (alk. paper) — ISBN 0-7914-5872-5 (pbk. : alk. paper) 1. Comprehension (Theory of knowledge) I. Title. II. Series. BD181.5.M27 2003 121—dc21 2003042557 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 for Margie Contents INTRODUCTION, 1 CHAPTER ONE WHAT WE UNDERSTAND, 7 CHAPTER TWO HOW WE UNDERSTAND, 21 CHAPTER THREE UNDERSTANDING AND KNOWLEDGE, 39 CHAPTER FOUR INTELLIGIBILITY, 51 CHAPTER FIVE FAILURES OF UNDERSTANDING, 67 CHAPTER SIX BEYOND UNDERSTANDING, 89 viii CONTENTS CHAPTER SEVEN WISDOM, 105 NOTES, 115 BIBLIOGRAPHY, 125 INDEX OF NAMES, 131 Introduction A physicist tries to understand quantum mechanics. A parent tries to understand a child. A critic tries to understand a new style of painting. A historian tries to understand the movement of grain prices in ancient Rome. We may be baffled by other people, by ourselves, by life, by other societies, by the arts, and much more. A desire for understanding has seemed akin to a natural human instinct of curiosity. What we want may not be extra information but something—some form of understanding—that will make sense to us, or for us. What sort of definition or theory could possibly tie all this together?......

Words: 57755 - Pages: 232

Philosophy

...the principle of identity (Palmer). 4. Rene Descartes, the father of western canon of philosophy, reestablished his system of beliefs because of his famed statement corgito ergo sum. Where is the place of the thing that thinks in Locke’s system? Explain the standard form and how it applies to the system of Descartes and Locke. Descartes’ famed statement corgito ergo sum of “I think, therefore I am” is his realization that he is thinking and therefore cannot doubt his existence. He was a rationalist who believed that we can gain knowledge by the use of reason alone, without reference to the external world. John Locke thought that the human mind at birth was a tabula rasa, a blank tablet, on which experience writes the general principles and details of all knowledge. Basically all knowledge comes from experience. The place of the thing that thinks in Locke’s system is the human mind learning by experience as opposed to innate ideas already in place. The standard form is a consistent way of organizing deductive arguments, which involves a major premise, minor premise, and a conclusion. The stand form is to be a valid argument, saying “All As are Bs. S is an A. Therefore S is a B.” For example if John danced when Mary sang, and Mary sang; so John danced. The standard form helps point out if there is error in an argument. According to the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, “Experience teaches us that an inference can initially seem more secure than it is;......

Words: 374 - Pages: 2