Nike's Comparative Advantage

In: Business and Management

Submitted By aallan3319
Words 807
Pages 4
The Company

Nike, Inc is a major publicly traded sportswear and equipment supplier based in the United States. The company is headquartered near Beaverton, Oregon, which is part of the Portland metropolitan area. It is the world's leading supplier of athletic shoes and apparel and is also a major manufacturer of sports equipment. Nike currently employs around 38,000 people worldwide. Nikes products are known worldwide and there is high demand in most countries globally.
The company was founded in January 1964 as Blue Ribbon Sports by Bill Bowerman and Philip Knight, and officially became Nike, Inc. in 1978.. Nike markets its products under its own brand as well as multiple other brands such as, Nike Golf, Nike Pro, Nike+, Nike Skateboarding and subsidiaries including Cole Haan, Hurley International, Umbro and Converse. In addition to manufacturing sportswear and equipment, the company operates retail stores under the Niketown name.

Comparative Advantage
Nike uses its involvement in multiple countries to gain some sort of comparative advantage. This refers to the increase in production efficiency through specialisation in separate countries which perform a task in some way better, in this case cheaper. Nike, although based in the US, produces all of its goods outside the US in many different countries.
In Shoe production, for example, in 2010 products were produced in Vietnam, China, Indonesia, Thailand and India. This diversification of production gives not only a comparative advantage in cheap labour when producing these shoes, compared to producing domestically, but also gives a closer proximity and possibly cheaper transport costs to large markets such as Europe.
Nike also manufactures its shoes in Countries such as Argentina and Brazil using agreements with independent factories. Shoes produced through these agreements are meant primarily for sale…...

Similar Documents

Nike's Reputation

...the current reputation which can impact the future financial performances. -All of these elements have a positive impact on profit.   Develop relationship with stakeholders -“Any group or individual who can affect or is affected by the achievement of an organisation’s objectives” (Freeman, 1984, p.46). -Shareholders, customers, employees, business partners, media, government, local communities, environment. -The company must communicate efficiently, transparently and use different ways of communication for each stakeholder to maintain and develop strong relationship (Benjamin A. Neville, Simon J. Bell and . Bulent Menguc, 2005).   Create a competitive advantage -Reputation like brand image is an intangible but valuable element of a company. -Managing reputation is a strategy that provides a competitive advantage as the company’s stock is more valuable which attract investors. -Investors provide a revenue which will be used to reinforce R&D or marketing which enhance good reputation (positive vicious circle).     Increase employees satisfaction -Great place to work=Great place to buy=Great place to invest -Employees are a key stakeholder in the success of corporate brand, they promote the company’s brand values. -Need a strong level of job satisfaction, a feeling of pride, an effective commitment and awareness of their impact on corporate reputation (Sabrina Helm, 2010). -Good reputation attracts and retain good employees.   Current......

Words: 740 - Pages: 3

A Direct Test of the Theory of Comparative Advantage: the Case of Japan

...A Direct Test of the Theory of Comparative Advantage: The Case of Japan Author(s): Daniel M. Bernhofen and John C. Brown Reviewed work(s): Source: Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 112, No. 1 (February 2004), pp. 48-67 Published by: The University of Chicago Press Stable URL: . Accessed: 10/02/2012 10:27 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at . JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact The University of Chicago Press is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Journal of Political Economy. A Direct Test of the Theory of Comparative Advantage: The Case of Japan Daniel M. Bernhofen and John C. Brown Clark University We exploit Japan’s sudden and complete opening up to international trade in the 1860s to test the empirical validity of one of the oldest and most fundamental propositions in economics: the theory of comparative advantage. Historical evidence supports the assertion that the characteristics of the Japanese economy at the time were compatible with the...

Words: 8511 - Pages: 35

Comparative Advantage vs. Absolute Advantage

...Explain comparative advantage, absolute advantage and explain what that has to do with today’s economy. A country has an absolute advantage in the production of a good relative to another country if it can produce the good at lower cost or with higher productivity. Absolute advantage compares industry productivities across countries. In the case of Zambia, for instance, the country has an absolute advantage over many countries in the production of copper. This occurs because of the existence of reserves of copper ore or bauxite. We can see that in terms of the production of goods, there are obvious gains from specialization and trade, if Zambia produces copper and exports it to those countries that specialize in the production of other goods or services. It is easy to see that if countries have an absolute advantage there are advantages to trade. However, what happens if one country has an absolute advantage over its trading partners in the production of a number of goods. Specialization and trade can still result in there being welfare gains made from trade. A country has a comparative advantage in the production of a good or service that it produces at a lower opportunity cost than its trading partners. The opportunity cost of a good is the quantity of other goods sacrificed to make another unit of that good. Some countries have an absolute advantage in the production of many goods relative to their trading partners. Some have an absolute disadvantage....

Words: 595 - Pages: 3

Bretton Woods and Comparative Advantage

...This paper will go over the theories of absolute and comparative advantage and will also go over the principal aspects of the Bretton Woods agreement and following its demise the decision of the EU (European Union) countries to create a single currency. Let me remind you of the handouts from The Economist (trade Winds and Comparatively Speaking) and the material from Daniels and Radebaugh. I want us today to look carefully at the assumptions underpinning the theory of specialisation [Daniels and Radebaugh pp 176 - 177]. A handout has already been provided. Full employment is one of the central assumptions for these theories of trade to apply. In the world being described by either Smith or Ricardo unemployment as such was probably an unknown phenomenon. Society was largely agricultural and highly stable. People had to work! They had to be employed. And doubtless wage rates adjusted to the point where there was no unemployment as we know it today. But in the world of today the backdrop is very different. How do we deal with that where wage rates are not downwardly adjustable? We have looked at the specialisation argument. This can be seen very differently depending where you are in the argument. Some analysts have throughout history argued that the notion of specialisation into one particular pattern of output ‘fixes’ that pattern. This may very well disadvantage one nation when compared with another. What about the ‘infant industries’ argument. How would you......

Words: 855 - Pages: 4

Comparative Advantage&Liberalization

...I would divide the elements in the policies of India that were there against Comparative advantage and international trade into three major groups: extensive bureaucratic controls over production, investment and trade; inward-looking trade and restricted foreign investment policies; and conventional confines of public utilities and infrastructure. The former two adversely affected the private sector’s efficiency. The last, with the inefficient functioning of public sector enterprises, impaired additionally the public sector enterprises’ contribution to the economy. Encouraged joint ventures with multinational firms were a move which would have given India a comparative advantage and boosted its international trade. India embraced the path of liberalization in the early nineties. A gradual opening of the economy and withdrawal of trade barriers were the natural offshoots of the policy option hitherto chosen. With the withering away of ‘protectionist’ policies, the trade pattern of India is likely to march in the direction of its comparative advantage. India’s comparative advantage is in labor and resource-intensive items such as textile, yarn and apparel or in technology and science based manufactures such as chemicals, minerals and metal manufactures. India is a major hub for polishing and cutting of diamonds. Low labor costs and a huge workforce have enabled the industry to thrive. Cheap labor costs in India plays a crucial role in protecting the cost benefits of......

Words: 351 - Pages: 2

Comparative Advantage

...The rise of gas prices over the years has put financial strain on people all round the world. Last year, the average gas price was at $3.60, breaking records.. A decreased consumption should ideally lead to a fall in the price of a commodity, but with gas prices, it has been the opposite. Although there’s been a decrease in the consumption of gas in US, emerging markets such as China and India have pushed the demand for crude oil. The fact that these two countries account for approximately 35% of the global population explains the reason for high demand for gasoline in these countries. According to statistics, China consumes about 9,000,000 barrels of gasoline every day. India, on the other hand, needs 3,182,000 barrels on a daily basis to meet its energy needs. Although these countries do not export crude oil to US, the demand they create in the global oil market increases the likelihood of a price hike, notably by the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries. The good news for Americans is that the decline in oil prices may continue in 2013, and the prices will not go as high as they had in the last year. Irrespective of the fluctuations in the price of gas prices, we need to remember that the oil reserves around the world are non-renewable. To ensure that these reserves are not completely depleted, attempts should be made to develop alternative sources of energy. Signing off, we hope that this article helps you in understanding the underlying causes of high......

Words: 266 - Pages: 2

The Comparative Advantage of Greece in the Era of Recession

...The comparative advantage of Greece in the era of recession Lampros Gallos National and Kapodistrian University of Athens Athens, Greece Abstract The aim of this paper is to investigate the export behaviour of Greece and to identify its comparative advantage. Moreover, through the conclusions of the analysis, is investigated whether the export activity of the country coincides with its comparative advantage especially in the present circumstances, those of recession. Initially, we define the comparative advantage based on the approaches of Adam Smith, David Ricardo's and Heckscher-Ohlin. Furthermore we analyze the current situation of the country, Greece’s economic structure and its trade performance, mainly the exports. In addition we identify the elements of the Greek competitiveness and the results of the fiscal consolidation that Greece is undergoing. Having analyzed the definition of the comparative advantage and the data concerning Greece’s reforms we proceed in identifying Greece’s comparative advantage mainly in four different sectors. Firstly we identify the key factors making the touristic sector extremely profitable for the Greek economy; secondly we analyze the commercial shipping sector then the strategically position of the country and finally the competitive rates in which Greece seems to gain ground. Keywords: comparative advantage, competitiveness, internationalisation, entrepreneurship, financial crisis. 1 Contents: 1....

Words: 4235 - Pages: 17

Comparative Advantage

...Comparative Advantage Christopher L Kearney University of Phoenix ECO/GM 561 International Economics Watson T. Ragin June 27, 2011 Comparative Advantage This writing will begin by defining the concept of comparative advantage while comparing the automobile industry in the United States and the industry in Japan and expound of the similarities and differences of both of the countries. According to comparative advantage is defined as the ability of a business entity to engage in production at a lower cost than another entity. Comparative Advantage, rather than absolute advantage is useful in determining what should be produced and what should be acquired through trade. Japan is the country being compared to the United States. Japan is in Eastern Asia and has a population of 126.9 million with the capital Tokyo. Most people who reside in the climate speak Japanese and the major religions practices are Shintoism and Buddhism. The money unit used in the country is yen and the country exports vehicles, computer parts, chemicals, scientific instruments, and watches. Whereas, the United States is l in North America, bordering the North Atlantic Ocean and the North Pacific Ocean, between Canada and Mexico and has a population of 317.6 million with the capital being Washington DC. The predominate language in the United States is English and the major religion practice is Christianity. The currency used in the United States is the American Dollar. The...

Words: 1265 - Pages: 6

Comparative Advantage

...Management AMM 103 October 16, 2005 Absolute Advantage and Comparative Advantage According to the classic model of international trade introduced by David Ricardo (19th-century English economist) to explain the pattern and the gains from trade in terms of comparative advantage, it assumes a perfect competition and a single factor of production, labor, with constant requirements of labor per unit of output that differ across countries. The basis for trade in the Ricardian model is the differences in technology between countries. As a result, there are two different ways to describe technology differences: the first method, called absolute advantage, is the way most people understand technology differences; and the second method, called comparative advantage, is a much more difficult concept. Absolute advantage is the simplest measure of economic performance. It is the ability to produce a good at a lower cost, in terms of real resources than another country. Absolute Advantage is neither necessary nor sufficient for a country to export a good. In other words, a country has an absolute advantage economically over another, in a particular good, when it can produce that good more cheaply or it can produce more of the good than another country can, with the same amount of resources. In fact, absolute advantage appears when multiple products are being considering. For example, if the country “A” has an economic advantage against the country “B” at producing the......

Words: 1112 - Pages: 5

David Ricardo and the Law of Comparative Advantages

...Smith, international trade could in fact be beneficial to all participants if each country would specialise in the production of goods where it had an absolute advantage in terms of costs. By producing a good cheaper than everyone else and by importing others, a country could immensely gain from international trade. Although revolutionary, Smith’s theory of absolute advantages was not free from flaws. In fact if a country didn't have such advantage in producing a given good it wouldn't have access to trade, or in another words, trade wouldn't occur if country A couldn't be the most efficient in producing good B. In this context and in attempt to improve Smiths’ theory, David Ricardo a British political economist of Portuguese origin, introduced the theory of comparative advantages. In sum Ricardo argued that even if a country didn't have an absolute advantage in the production of a certain good, it would still participate in international trade by exporting the one it was relatively more efficient in producing. David Ricardo took and developed the notions brought about by Adam Smith in his 1817 book “Principles of Political Economy and Taxation” becoming even at the present day one of the most referred works in what international trade theory is concerned. Is however Ricardo’s theory of comparative advantages flawless and possible to apply to every economy and setting, or does it have limitations to its main axioms? In this essay it is aimed to test the present day......

Words: 1813 - Pages: 8

Comparative and Absolute Advantage

...Comparative and Absolute Advantage ECO 561 Alfred Igbodipe 7/24/16 Introduction Due to the differences between the countries in its profitable fundamentals; the International Trade occurs. The contracts between the countries consider as the primary driver of the global exchange. These contracts concluded on the basis of the countries beneficial elements and advantages. Each international trade between the countries depends on numerous focal points of this exchange process. The economics and producers effectiveness measured by absolute advantage for these economics/producers. For example; if the producer needs lesser amount of contributions/inputs to provide specific product, then this producer has an absolute advantage in producing process. Comparative advantage discusses the economy/producer ability to produce a specific product with a minimum opportunity cost comparing to another producer. "There is a possibility of each nation to have an absolute advantage in producing and delivering the products; however; the different nations could in any case have distinctive comparative advantages". The international trade theory based on two dynamic concepts; "Absolute and comparative advantage". The main difference between these concepts is that the absolute advantage measure nation ability to produce more profits per unit of beneficial input than another. However; the comparative advantage measure the ability that one nation has an absolute advantage in each kind of......

Words: 4210 - Pages: 17

Absolute and Comparative Advantage

...iess_Batch4_A-L 5/11/07 11:14 AM Page 1 A–L ABSOLUTE AND COMPARATIVE ADVANTAGE During the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries the dominant economic philosophy was mercantilism, which advocated severe restrictions on import and aggressive efforts to increase export. The resulting export surplus was supposed to enrich the nation through the inflow of precious metals. Adam Smith (1776), who is regarded as the father of modern economics, countered mercantilist ideas by developing the concept of absolute advantage. He argued that it was impossible for all nations to become rich simultaneously by following mercantilist prescriptions because the export of one nation is another nation’s import. However, all nations would gain simultaneously if they practiced free trade and specialized in accordance with their absolute advantage. Table I, illustrating Smith’s concept of absolute advantage, shows quantities of wheat and cloth produced by one hour’s work in two countries, the United States and the United Kingdom. Division of labor and specialization occupy a central place in Smith’s writing. Table I indicates what the international division of labor should be, as the United States has an absolute advantage in wheat and the U.K. has an absolute advantage in cloth. Smith’s absolute advantage is determined by a simple comparison of labor productivities across countries. Smith’s theory of absolute advantage predicts that the United States will produce only wheat (W) and the U...

Words: 1524 - Pages: 7

Comparative Advantage Us and Japan

...Comparative Advantage U.S. and Japan Business Policy and Strategy BA490 12 March 2012 Comparative Advantage The theory of comparative advantage states that “a country has a comparative advantage in those products that make intensive use of those resources available in abundance within that country” (p. 374) this means if a country such as China has a large supply of unskilled workers and low costs for labor, they have a comparative advantage to the rest of the global market in clothing, and things made by hand or on assembly lines. The US and Japan also have comparative advantage as noted in the below chart and we will discuss the comparative advantage of the US and Japan base on the following calculations. | United States | Japan | Cereals | +0.83 | -0.99 | Mineral Fuels | -0.82 | -0.93 | Pharmaceuticals | -0.25 | -0.51 | Vehicles | -0.41 | +0.81 | Aerospace | +0.58 | -0.44 | Electrical and electronic equipment | -0.26 | +0.41 | Optical, photo, medical and scientific equipment | +0.09 | +0.21 | Apparel (woven) | -0.92 | -0.96 | Finance and insurance | -0.10 | +0.08 | (p. 376) United State’s comparative advantage The United States has a few things they do very well in the global market the top commodity that the US is able to capitalize on in the global market is cereals. The US is right next to Australia and followed by Canada when it comes to cereal. I think we can attribute this to the natural resource we harvest which is......

Words: 632 - Pages: 3

Developing Countries Comparative Advantage

...standard of living, underdeveloped industrialized base, and moderate to low Human Development Index (HDI). This index is a comparative measure of poverty, literacy, education, life expectancy and other factors for countries worldwide. The index was developed in 1990 by Pakistani and economist Mahbub ul Haq, and has been used since 1993 by the United Nations development program. In order for a country to become a developed nation, it would involve a modern infrastructure, (both physical and institutional), and a move away from low value added sectors such as agriculture and natural resource extraction. Developed countries usually have economic systems based on continuous self-sustaining economic growth and high standards of living unlike that of a developing country. Policies that make an economy open to trade and investment with the rest of the world are needed to sustain economic growth, especially for developing nations. No country in recent decades has achieved economic success in terms of significant increases in living standards for its people, without being opened to the rest of the world. In contrast, trade opening, (along with opening to foreign direct investment), has been an important element for economic success. Opening up their economies to the global economy has been essential in assisting many developing countries to develop comparative advantages in the manufacture of certain products. There is considerable evidence that more outward-orientated countries......

Words: 1122 - Pages: 5

Comparative Advantage

...International Economics ECON22185 Assessment title: Analyse how, according to the Heckscher-Ohlin model of international trade, factor endowments explain a country’s comparative advantage and determine which types of goods a country will produce, export and import. According to J.Sloman (2010) comparative advantage is defined as ‘a country has a comparative advantage over another in the production of a good if it can produce it at a lower opportunity cost: i.e. if it has to forgo less of other goods in order to produce it.’ David Ricardo had developed the basic theory of comparative advantage which was further developed by two Swedish economists, Bertil Ohlin and Eli Heckscher who developed the Heckscher-Ohlin model in 1933 which explains why countries trade goods and services with each other and how factor endowments determine which goods a country would produce, export and import. Factor endowments are the amount of labour, capital, land and entrepreneurship that can be exploited for manufacturing in a country. Labour and capital are the two factor endowments that the Heckscher-Ohlin model refers to. The Heckscher-Ohlin model assumes that the only difference between countries that are trading was the relative abundances of labour and capital they had. The model contained two countries, two goods that it could produce and two factor endowments; labour and capital, which is why it is sometimes referred to as the......

Words: 1163 - Pages: 5