Submitted By bmtsims

Words 412

Pages 2

Words 412

Pages 2

...1. David Nash was born in Esher, Surrey in 1945. He studied at Kingston College of Art (1963-64), Brighton College of Art (1964-67) and Chelsea School of Art (1969-70). After finishing school at Brighton, Nash moved to North Wales before returning to Chelsea for one year in 1969. In Wales he purchased a chapel which has remained both his studio and home ever since. Wales was ideal for Nash, because he was surrounded by abundant resources and plenty of time to further develop his wood works. 2. The most interesting thing I discovered about David Nash was that he uses a chainsaw and axe as his primary tools as well as using a blowtorch in many of his works.David Nash uses wood as a medium for all his works. His interest in working with wood began as a child, when Nash helped clear and replant a forest his father owned. He also worked for the Commercial Forestry Group, where he learned about many kinds of wood. He is known for doing land art involving wood that remains in nature, as well as displaying his wood sculpture in studios. He carves wood from fallen trees as well as creates sculptures from growing plants. 3. Nash first decided to move to Wales after graduating from Brighton College due to the extremely low cost of living. In these years he experimented with making tower like sculptures and some very abstract works. He used paint to give more detail to these sculptures as well, which was unique to this period for Nash. He continued experimenting with this tower......

Words: 938 - Pages: 4

...JOHN FORBES NASH JR. John Forbes Nash Jr. was born June 13, 1928 in Bluefield, West Virginia. Mr. Nash Jr. is an American mathematician who won the 1994 Nobel Prize for his works in the late 1980’s on game theory. Game theory is the study of strategic decision making or more formally known as the mathematical models of conflict and cooperation between intelligent and rational decision makers. Game theory is mainly used in economics, political science, and psychology, as well as logic and biology. Mr. Nash Jr. has also contributed numerous publications involving differential geometry, and partial differential equation (PDE). Differential geometry is a mathematical discipline that uses differential calculus and integral calculus, linear algebra and multi linear algebra to study geometry problems. Partial differential equation is a differential equation that contains unknown multivariable functions and their partial derivatives. These are used to formulate problems involving functions of several variables. Mr. Nash Jr. used all of these skills and is known for developing the Nash embedding theorem. The Nash embedding theorem stated that every Riemannian manifold ( a real smooth manifold equipped with an inner product on each tangent space that varies smoothly from point to point) can be isometrically embedded into some Euclidean space ( a three dimensional space of Euclidean geometry, distinguishes these spaces from the curved......

Words: 528 - Pages: 3

...________________________________________ The psychology in A Beautiful Mind (the movie) provides a valuable lesson for the practice of self awareness by ordinary people. Artistically differing from the actual events, it is a film, which convincingly uses the visual medium to portray stress and mental illness within one person's mind. The storyline supplants auditory symptoms with visual delusions to narrate the story of the paranoid schizophrenia developed by John Forbes Nash, a Nobel Laureate in Economics. It was an illness, which had been intensified by the anxiety felt by Nash, about the pain suffered by his wife and friends due to his mental condition. Even as he took medication to suppress the symptoms, Nash is shown returning to normal life by becoming self aware. The visually presented psychological symptoms in the movie effectively convey the barriers to distinguishing subconscious patterns within the mind. Click Here To Listen/Download This Page As An MP3 Podcast Psychology In A Beautiful Mind – Competition & Conflict The primary problem for Nash was his inability to distinguish between reality and his delusions. Even normal people fail to distinguish the concrete emotional changes in their viewpoints during the course of an average day. You may be fuming with resentment one moment and joyful, the next. These hidden shifts in moods and attitudes have a clear cause. They happen, because the control of your mind shifts between myriad competing and......

Words: 1880 - Pages: 8

...Player 1 will choose T…….(T,L) If player 2 choose R, then Player 1 will choose B……(B,R) Equilibriums: (2,2) and (4,4) Mixed Equilibrium For player 1 U_P1= 2xy+3x(1-y)+1(1-x)y+4(1-x)(1-y) U_P1= 2xy+3x-3xy+y-xy+4-4y-4x+4xy U_P1= 2xy-x-3y+4 Maximizing the utility dU/dx= 2y-1=0 y= 1/2 For Player 2 U_P2= 2xy+3(1-x)y+1(1-y)x+4(1-x)(1-y) U_P1= 2xy+3y-3xy+x-xy+4-4y-4x+4xy U_P1= 2xy-y-3x+4 Maximizing the utility dU/dy= 2x-1=0 x= 1/2 Nash equilibria are: (2,2) , (4,4) and ((1/2,1/2),(1/2,1/2)) Assuming that player 2 plays L with probability y and R with probability (1-y) The expected payoff for player 1 if plays T is: 2y + 3(1-y) = -y + 3 The expected payoff for player 1 if plays B is: 1y + 4(1-y) = -3y + 4 Assuming that player 1 plays T with probability x and B with probability (1-x) The expected payoff for player 2 if plays L is: 2x + 3(1-x) = -x + 3 The expected payoff for player 2 if plays R is: 1x + 4(1-x) = -3x + 4 Grafico Pure Nash Equilibriums are (2,2) and (4,4) Ambos son equilibrios perfectos hacer grafico If firm 1 choose Low, then firm 2 will choose Low ……(Low,Low) If firm 1 choose High, then firm 2 will choose Low……(High,Low) If firm 2 choose Low, then firm 1 will choose Low…….(Low,Low) If firm 2 choose High, then firm 1 will choose Low……(Low,High) The unique equilibrium is (2,2)...

Words: 1054 - Pages: 5

...Nash Chapters 7-11 Is Jesus the Only Savior Delores Underwood THEO 313-B02 Dr. Daubert October 12, 2013 Ronald Nash wrote a book called Is Jesus the Only Savior. It discusses his gathered findings and distinctions between Pluralism and Inclusiveness. This paper will explore some of Ronald Nash’s observations and the arguments, logics and Scripture used to support his writings. This paper will discuss several Religious leaders some pluralist others inclusivists, non-Christians, Christians and their beliefs, philosophies or opinions. In this paper the details of inclusiveness is discussed. It seems that everyone has a somewhat varied definition of inclusiveness. Nash has in his book that “inclusivism because its adherents believe that the scope of God’s salvation is significantly wider than that held by exclusivists-so wide in fact that it includes many people that have not explicitly believed in Jesus” (Nash,1994, p. 9). Actually inclusivists believe that salvation is impossible without Christ and they agree He is the only Savior. But they differ from the many in saying that limiting salvation can’t be right. They question what happens to those who have not heard of Christ or don’t believe because they simply have not been taught. (Nash, 1994) Nash talks a lot about others and their way of thinking such as John Hick, Gavin D’ Costa, John Sanders, Clark Pinnock, Stuart Hackett, Karl Rahner, Michael Barnes and others. “Gavin......

Words: 1604 - Pages: 7

...Lecturas Matem´ticas a Volumen 24 (2003), p´ginas 137–149 a John Nash y la teor´ de juegos ıa Sergio Monsalve Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Bogot´ a Al profesor y acad´mico Don Jairo Charris Casta˜ eda e n In memoriam Abstract. In the last twenty years, game theory has become the dominant model in economic theory and has made signiﬁcant contributions to political science, biology, and international security studies. The central role of game theory in economic theory was recognized by the awarding of the Nobel Price in Economic Science in 1994 to John C. Harsanyi, John F. Nash, & Reinhard Selten. The fundamental works in game theory of John F. Nash together with a brief exposition of them are included in this article. Key words and phrases. John Nash, History of Mathematics, Game Theory 1991 Mathematics Subject Classiﬁcation. Primary 01A70. Secondary 91A12. Resumen. En los ultimos veinte a˜os, la teor´ de juegos se ha ´ n ıa convertido en el modelo dominante en la teor´ econ´mica y ha ıa o contribuido signiﬁcativamente a la ciencia pol´ ıtica, a la biolog´ ıa y a estudios de seguridad nacional. El papel central de la teor´ ıa de juegos en teor´ econ´mica fue reconocido con el premio Nobel ıa o en Econom´ otorgado a John C. Harsanyi, John F. Nash & ıa Reinhard Selten en 1994. Se presentan los aportes de John Nash a la teor´ de juegos conjuntamente con una exposici´n ıa o elemental de ellos. 138 SERGIO MONSALVE 1. Introduction La Real Academia Sueca......

Words: 4568 - Pages: 19

...team 1 and team 2 would invest money until they reach Nash equilibrium and their profits are maximized. Since this model is a symmetric model, both teams have the same incentive to win and therefore at equilibrium it can be assumed that win% for team 1 will equal the win% for team 2. Knowing these givens and the equation given, profits for team 1 can be found as followed: π1 = Vw1 – t1 → V(2-g)/4 π1 = (500)(2-.5)/4 π1 = 187.5 The profit can then be plugged back into the initial equation to determine team 1’s investment: π1 = Vw1 – t1 The win percentages for both teams will be .5 because .5 + .5 = 100% in a symmetric model 187.5 = 500(.5) – t1 t1= 62.5 Since this is a symmetric model, it is assumed that the investments and profits for team 1 will equal team 2’s investments and profits. π1 = π2 187.5 = π2 t1 = t2 62.5 = t2 2. For model 1, profits are larger when g=1/2 because the investments made by both teams are lower and therefore π1 = Vw1 – t1 will result in higher profits. The reason team 1 and team 2’s investments will be lower is because there is less incentive to invest when the advantage for investing goes down, as it does with a lower sensitivity parameter. A lower g (sensitivity parameter) means that teams need to investment less to yield a higher win%. The following graph shows the difference in profits for g=1 and g= ½: 3. To calculate the Nash equilibrium for an asymmetric model win % and......

Words: 2149 - Pages: 9

...In game theory, the Nash equilibrium is a solution concept of a non-cooperative game involving two or more players, in which each player is assumed to know the equilibrium strategies of the other players, and no player has anything to gain by changing only their own strategy.[1] If each player has chosen a strategy and no player can benefit by changing strategies while the other players keep theirs unchanged, then the current set of strategy choices and the corresponding payoffs constitute a Nash equilibrium. Stated simply, Amy and Will are in Nash equilibrium if Amy is making the best decision she can, taking into account Will's decision, and Will is making the best decision he can, taking into account Amy's decision. Likewise, a group of players are in Nash equilibrium if each one is making the best decision that he or she can, taking into account the decisions of the others in the game. Contents [hide] * 1 Applications * 2 History * 3 Definitions * 3.1 Informal definition * 3.2 Formal definition * 3.3 Nash's Existence Theorem * 4 Examples * 4.1 Coordination game * 4.2 Prisoner's dilemma * 4.3 Network traffic * 4.4 Competition game * 4.5 Nash equilibria in a payoff matrix * 5 Stability * 6 Occurrence * 6.1 Where the conditions are not met * 6.2 Where the conditions are met * 7 NE and non-credible threats * 8 Proof of existence * 8.1 Proof using the Kakutani......

Words: 1390 - Pages: 6

...any individual for private study. 2 Nash Equilibrium: Theory 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4 2.5 2.6 2.7 2.8 2.9 2.10 Strategic games 11 Example: the Prisoner’s Dilemma 12 Example: Bach or Stravinsky? 16 Example: Matching Pennies 17 Example: the Stag Hunt 18 Nash equilibrium 19 Examples of Nash equilibrium 24 Best response functions 33 Dominated actions 43 Equilibrium in a single population: symmetric games and symmetric equilibria 49 Prerequisite: Chapter 1. 2.1 Strategic games is a model of interacting decision-makers. In recognition of the interaction, we refer to the decision-makers as players. Each player has a set of possible actions. The model captures interaction between the players by allowing each player to be affected by the actions of all players, not only her own action. Speciﬁcally, each player has preferences about the action proﬁle—the list of all the players’ actions. (See Section 17.4, in the mathematical appendix, for a discussion of proﬁles.) More precisely, a strategic game is deﬁned as follows. (The qualiﬁcation “with ordinal preferences” distinguishes this notion of a strategic game from a more general notion studied in Chapter 4.) A STRATEGIC GAME D EFINITION 11.1 (Strategic game with ordinal preferences) A strategic game (with ordinal preferences) consists of • a set of players • for each player, a set of actions • for each player, preferences over the set of action proﬁles. 11 12 Chapter 2. Nash Equilibrium: Theory A very wide range......

Words: 19938 - Pages: 80

...Running head: CASE STUDY OF JOHN FORBES NASH, JR. 1 Case Study of John Forbes Nash, Jr. Lauren Shipp PSY410 May 26, 2014 Kidd Colt, Ed. D., LMHC CASE STUDY OF JOHN FORBES NASH, JR. 2 Case Study of John Forbes Nash, Jr. John Forbes Nash Jr. is a renowned and accomplished mathematician. He received his Ph.D. from Princeton University and taught at MIT and Princeton. He wrote The Equilibrium Point, later becoming known as the Nash Equilibrium, which revolutionized economics. In 1994, he received the Nobel Peace Prize in Economic Science for his pioneering work in game theory. He is one of the most brilliant mathematicians of modern time, but most of his life he suffered from schizophrenia (Meyer, et al., 2009). The following is a brief account of a case study depicting his struggle with schizophrenia. Overview Early in Nash’s life he showed signs of abnormal behavior. He was extremely intelligent and could read by age 4, but was unsociable and had problems with concentrating and following simple directions. As he grew older, his behavior became more bizarre. He would do such things as eat grass, torture animals, and use explosives in chemical experiments. He still showed sign of unsocial behavior (Meyer, et al., 2009). When he entered Carnegie Institute of Technology to study chemical engineering, his abnormal behavior continued. He acted childish, and would do such things as repeatedly hit a single key on a piano for hours. After receiving his Ph.D. from......

Words: 1072 - Pages: 5

...University, John Nash is dedicated to make a contribution to serve in the world of mathematics. After graduate school, Dr. Nash turns into teaching, where he meets Alicia, a former student and now wife. In the meanwhile, the government asks Nash for his help by breaking codes with the Soviets, which leads to Nash getting involved in a conspiracy plot. Nash grows to be more and more paranoid only to find out that he has been diagnosed with Paranoid Schizophrenia. It is now up to Alicia and Dr. Rosen to help Nash recover to a strong mental state and help regain his status as a great and talented mathematician. John Nash has difficulty interacting with simple day-to-day situations in society. One specific scene involves a man coming up to Dr. Nash but Dr. Nash first asks a student if they can see the man as well. Nash then apologizes to the man and explains that he gets skeptical of people he has never met before due to his schizophrenia and his hallucinations. A scene that best explains societies perception on Nash’s disability is when Nash goes back to Princeton and approaches his old friend and rival, Martin Hansen, who is now the head of the Princeton mathematics department. Hansen grants Nash permission to work out the library and audit classes. The scene ends with him storming out of the library and screaming to his hallucinations telling them they are not real. Other students who are around Nash look at him with confusion because they obviously cannot see what Nash is......

Words: 610 - Pages: 3

...then player 1 earns $650 and player 2 earns $0. a. Write the above game in normal form. b. Find each player's dominant strategy, if it exists. c. Find the Nash equilibrium (or equilibria) of this game. d. Rank strategy pairs by aggregate payoff (highest to lowest). e. Can the outcome with the highest aggregate payoff be sustained in equilibrium? Why or why not? a. Write the above game in normal form. | |Player 1 chooses A |Player 1 chooses B | |Player 2 chooses A |A, A |A, B | | |500, 500 |0 , 650 | |Player 2 chooses B |B, A |B, B | | |650, 0 |100, 100 | b. Find each player's dominant strategy, if it exists. The dominant strategy for each player is to choose B. 100>0 & 650>500 c. Find the Nash equilibrium (or equilibria) of this game. Nash equilibrium is for each to choose B. This is because no matter what the player 2 does, if the player 1 picks B, they'll get a better result. d.......

Words: 1598 - Pages: 7

...A Nash equilibrium is a pair of strategies, one for each player, in which each strategy is a best response to other. These represent the likely outcome of the game. According to Roger B. Myerson, “If we can predict the behavior of all the players in such a game, then our prediction must be a Nash equilibrium, or else it would violate this assumption of intelligent rational individual behavior. That is, if our predicted behavior does not satisfy the conditions for Nash equilibrium, then there must be at least one individual whose expected welfare could be improved simply by re-educating him to more effectively pursue his own best interests, without any other social change.” The above argument does not prove that Nash equilibrium should be the only methodological basis for analysis of social institutions. But it does explain why studying Nash equilibria should be a fruitful part of the critical analysis of almost any kind of social institution. The prisoners dilemma is one of the best examples of Nash Equilibrium. | | Jack | | | | C | NC | Tom | C | -10,-10 | 0,-20 | | NC | -20,0 | -5,-5 | | | | | *Numbers represent years in prison If every player in a game plays his dominant pure strategy (assuming every player has a dominant pure strategy), then the outcome will be a Nash equilibrium.According to the above game both players know that 10 years is better than 20 and 0 years is better than 5; therefore, C is their dominant strategy and they will......

Words: 405 - Pages: 2

...Definitions and illustrations of the concepts of Pareo and Nash equilibria. PARETO OPTIMUM/EQUILIBIRUM/EFFICIENT The idea of pareto optimum runs through all aspects of economics, for example, comparing different tax rules, and not just in game theory. It gained currency as a test to be applied in selecting economic policy as a result of a contradiction in the theory of the market deriving from the philosophy of utilitarianism. Utilitarianism could be construed as a justification for the oppression of the individual in the name of the greater good of society. This approach sits uncomfortably with the libertarian ideals of market economics, which put the individual above church and the (feudal) state, and by implication above the monarch in direct challenge to feudal rule. (see, eg, http://www.google.co.uk/#hl=en&source=hp&biw=1126&bih=425&q=Shanti+Chakravarty+neoliberal&btnG=Google+Search&aq=f&aqi=&aql=&oq=Shanti+Chakravarty+neoliberal&fp=45f26fda8f9185dd). To get around the difficulty posed by classical utilitarianism, market efficiency theorems came to rely on the idea of ordinal utility which does not allow for inter-personal comparison of utility. The paretian criterion explicitly rejects inter-personal comparison in arriving at economic policy. The paretian criterion is focused entirely on the individual. A pareto optimum is a state of affairs whereby NO ONE, no individual, can be made better off without making someone worse off. Since no one is above anyone in......

Words: 2188 - Pages: 9

...Ball Like Steve Nash Standing at 6’3 and weighing in at 178 lbs most people know the infamous Steve Nash from the past fifteen years that he has dedicated his life to professional basketball. Before pursuing the American dream of becoming a professional athlete, Nash was born in South Africa but grew up in Victoria, Canada where he played soccer till his late teens. He later discovered a passion for basketball where he hooped at St. Michaels University School with his younger brother Martin. He comes from a family of athletes including his father John Nash who played minor professional soccer in South Africa. His sister Joann Nash held the title as captain of the soccer team for The University of Victoria for three years. It was only right for him to keep on the family legacy. Nash took his talent to Santa Clara University in California where he led his team to the NCAA tournament as a freshman. He established a name for himself by his sophomore year with his quick feet, fundamentals, and amazing skills. Nba scouts were all over him and at no surprise he was drafted in the first round by the Phoenix Suns in 1996. He played two seasons with the Suns before being traded to the Dallas Mavericks. There Nash made a name for himself in the league with Dirk Nowitzki and Michael Finley by his side. They formed an unstoppable trio that carried the team to the Western Conference Finals. Although they didn’t get much farther Nash participated in the NBA All-Star Game and was......

Words: 640 - Pages: 3