Mr Ford

In: Business and Management

Submitted By university
Words 282
Pages 2
Ford was born July 30, 1863, on a farm in Greenfield Township (near Detroit, Michigan).[1] His father, William Ford (1826–1905), was born in County Cork, Ireland, of a family originally from western England, who were among migrants to Ireland as the English created plantations.[citation needed] His mother, Mary Litogot Ford (1839–1876), was born in Michigan; she was the youngest child of Belgian immigrants; her parents died when Mary was a child and she was adopted by neighbors, the O'Herns. Henry Ford's siblings include Margaret Ford (1867–1938); Jane Ford (c. 1868–1945); William Ford (1871–1917) and Robert Ford (1873–1934).

His father gave him a pocket watch in his early teens. At 15, Ford dismantled and reassembled the timepieces of friends and neighbors dozens of times, gaining the reputation of a watch repairman.[2] At twenty, Ford walked four miles to their Episcopal church every Sunday.[3]

Ford was devastated when his mother died in 1876. His father expected him to eventually take over the family farm, but he despised farm work. He told his father, "I never had any particular love for the farm—it was the mother on the farm I loved."[4]

In 1879, he left home to work as an apprentice machinist in the city of Detroit, first with James F. Flower & Bros., and later with the Detroit Dry Dock Co. In 1882, he returned to Dearborn to work on the family farm, where he became adept at operating the Westinghouse portable steam engine. He was later hired by Westinghouse company to service their steam engines. During this period Ford also studied bookkeeping at Goldsmith, Bryant & Stratton Business College in…...

Similar Documents

Ford

...the Ford Motor Company was one of the leading auto manufactures in the United States. Ford was credited with revolutionizing the muscle car era of the 1950’s and 1960’s. During the mid 1960’s Lee Iacocca helped Ford establish itself in the late 1960’s with the introduction of the Ford Mustang. During this time foreign auto manufactures were gaining market share in the mid to compact car markets. This was largely due to customers seeking more fuel efficient cars because of soaring fuel prices. Ford saw an opportunity to regain a portion of this market with the introduction of the Ford Pinto. This would bring them into direct competition with the foreign manufactures. The idea was to produce a small car that was affordable for the customer, and had a relatively high profit margin. With the introduction of the Ford Pinto, Ford’s desire to compete with the foreign manufacturers led Ford to overlook known design flaws and their own ethics while in search of higher profits. The People In May of 1968 then vice president of Ford Motor Company Lee Iacocca recommended the introduction of a subcompact car into the market. The Ford Pinto’s design and development period was the shortest in automotive history (Trevino, p. 115). Iacocca wanted the Ford Pinto in showrooms by 1971, the development and design process was accelerated from 43 months to 38 months. Ford assigned a team of engineers to work on nothing but the Pinto. This team was required to stick to Mr.......

Words: 290 - Pages: 2

Ford

...Case 10: Ford: Supply Chain Strategy I. Introduction/Background Ford Motor Company is widely regarded as one of America’s premier automotive manufacturers and the second largest industrial corporation in the world, with operations in over 200 countries. Ford was established by Henry Ford in 1903, and is still standing strong today. Although Ford has significant revenues from its financial services, its core business is the design and manufacturing of motor vehicles. Due to overcapacity within the automobile industry, Ford developed a restructuring plan called Ford 2000 that focused on globalizing corporate organizations and taking advantage of economies of scale. Ford 2000 completely re-engineered several of Ford’s key processes including the Ford Production System (FPS) and Order to Delivery (OTD). FPS was created to convert Ford’s supply chain from a push strategy to a pull strategy. To increase supply chain efficiency, Ford aimed at reducing the number of suppliers that had accumulated over the years. Ford accomplished this by developing a closer, long term relationship with fewer suppliers referred to as “Tier 1” suppliers. These suppliers would provide complete vehicle subsystems for Ford. Tier 1 suppliers work closely with several Tier 2 suppliers who provide the components for the Tier 1 subsystems. Another initiative taken by Ford to improve their supply chain was the Ford Retail Network. This helped reduce competition among its dealership in the same......

Words: 924 - Pages: 4

Ford

...Ford Motor Company – Case Study Jason Austin Denine Rood Jeanne Sands Like apple pie and a summer baseball game, Ford Motor Company has come to symbolize America, the land of opportunity. This America is a place where a person with scarcely any means can take little more than an idea and transform it into one of the most successful companies in the world. This is the story of Henry Ford and the Ford Motor Company. Consider the following quote from the Ford Web site. Ford Motor Company entered the business world on June 16, 1903, when Henry Ford and 11 business associates signed the company's articles of incorporation. With $28,000 in cash, the pioneering industrialists gave birth to what was to become one of the world's largest corporations. Few companies are as closely identified with the history and development of industry and society throughout the 20th century as Ford Motor Company. Henry Ford and his business partners where true entrepreneurs. Today, when we think about Ford, we think about innovation. From Henry Ford’s revolutionary idea of the assembly line to the new vehicles that Ford introduces every day, innovation has always been a cornerstone of Ford’s business. One little known fact is that Ford embraced QFD (Quality Function Deployment) , a Japanese quality methodology, into their product design process significantly earlier than most companies in the United States. This embracing of new ideology has led Ford to offer products...

Words: 3911 - Pages: 16

Ford

...Introduction of Ford Company "We are a globally diverse family, with a proud heritage, that's passionately committed to providing outstanding products and services." The mission Statement of Ford reflects the success and the fame that the company has acquired after surviving strongly in the automotive industry all these years. True they are a globally diverse family, as they have their manufacturing units all over the world. The sales figure of the company holds strong even during the times of economic downfall, all mainly because of the high standards of strategic planning by the marketing team. Ford Motor Company was founded in 1902 and the legend is popular for its exceptional achievements. The most popular of the Car coming out of Ford Motors is the Mustang, to the large scale manufacturing of using moving assembly lines show us how Ford Motors has been setting standards in the fields of innovation and quality. For CEO Mr. Allan Mullaly in a statement given to the contact magazine said that one of his for priorities in the ONE Ford plan is "accelerate development of new products our customers want and value." This does not seem to be a surprise as now in the market lies in the customer's hands where he would want the best of the line of products and for the cheapest price. And in this era where the growth in globalization is sky rocketing it is the sole aim of car manufacturers to grab customers towards their business or they might end up closing their......

Words: 3217 - Pages: 13

Ford

...The changes at Ford initiated by CEO Mulally, a former aerospace guy, have meant the difference between death for the automaker and merely being sick Almost 30 months after Alan R. Mulally left Boeing (BA) to become chief executive of Ford Motor (F), it's still easy to peg him as an industry outsider. Talking to Wall Street analysts in November, Mulally described the debut of the tiny, fuel-sipping Ford Ka at the "Paris Air Show" when he meant the "Paris Motor Show." Earlier this year, Mulally showed how he'd tried to stop appending an airplane doodle to his signature, but struggled to ink a car instead. "Rats. I still haven't got the car down," he said, in the "aw shucks" Kansas delivery that has become as familiar in Detroit as his off-the-rack blazers and shirts. Outsider CEOs have a decidedly varied track record. Some bring in their own people and impose a jarring management philosophy on a corporate culture, as Robert Nardelli did at Home Depot with such mixed results that the board pushed him out. Some are unsuited to running an unfamiliar business. Former S.C. Johnson CEO William Perez's 13-month stint at Nike (NKE) comes to mind. Others tread more softly and succeed, like Eric Schmidt, the former Novell (NOVL) guy who runs Google (GOOG). Mulally arguably falls into the latter category. Since arriving he has left most of the team he inherited in place and quieted talk that an aerospace guy couldn't run an automaker. Of course, Ford remains a very sick company. It......

Words: 3111 - Pages: 13

Ford

...Case: The Ford Pinto 1.) In my judgment, I feel that the management of Ford Company should be held morally responsible for Mrs. Gray’s death and Richard Grimshaw’s injuries. This is because Ford Company put the Pinto on the market to be sold. In that case, the managers were aware of the risk factors if indeed these cars did sale. Certainly, I do feel the Ford Company as a whole, should be held legally liable for the death of Mrs. Gray and the injuries of Richard Grimshaw. I strongly believe this because in the case it states, “Although the normal preproduction testing and development of an automobile takes about forty-three months, Iacocca managed to bring the Pinto to the production stage in a little over two years”. This simply shows the Pinto was clearly not ready to be on the market. The internal memos even showed that Ford crashed-tested early models of the Pinto before the production. The Pinto was tested over forty times and each test unfortunately results in a ruptured fuel tank. Since the crash tests models did not succeed, I do not understand why the Pinto was placed on the market. The management was unwilling to pay the minimal expense to redesign the vehicles. In that case according to the cost benefit analysis, it is morally wrong of them because they found it out to be cheaper to pay the lawsuits off from the deaths rather than paying for the safety makeover of the cars. The management of Ford was indeed forgetting about the life of a human and worrying......

Words: 919 - Pages: 4

Ford

...The biggest influence on the decision to implement the baffle comes from a human element that seems to be missing from Ford’s decision. Human life is priceless, but Ford did manage to place a number on it. The loss of life is enough external pressure to influence the recall of the Pinto and add a part that cost less than a trip to the movies. “One Ford engineer, when asked about the dangerous gas tank said, “Safety isn’t the issue; trunk space is” (De George, 2005, p. 116). The Ford Company did not operate with a concern for the people. Instead of placing the safety of consumers at the top of the list, Lee Iacocca placed profit and competition above all. “As Lee Iacocca was fond of saying, “Safety does not sell” (Newton & Ford, 2008, p. 297). Recalling the cars did not seem to be of any concern and losing money is not an option. The company was not short on resources. They had the information, the materials, and the know-how to produce a safe vehicle. The consumers deserve to have a product that is safe and affordable. Unfortunately, the powers at the top did not take into account what the consumer thinks. The risk/benefit analysis was a large part of the decision to avoid the recall. This would place a dollar amount on human life. It would cost the company more to fix the problem than to save a number of lives. “When someone dies as a result of a dangerous product, unsafe treatment or negligent corporate behavior, we can't measure how much the deceased......

Words: 515 - Pages: 3

Ford

...I. Viewpoint Internal Solution Alan Mullaly – Mullaly led Boeing through its most ambitious product launch in decades with the 767 Dreamliner and he became the new CEO of the Ford Company. In addition, he primarily solved the problems encountered by the firm and led them to a better future. II. 2008 Revenue dropped and lost market share 2008 Revenue dropped and lost market share Timeline 10years of plummet 10years of plummet 2010 Revenue or sale highly increase 2010 Revenue or sale highly increase 2010 Successfully brought down nameplates 2010 Successfully brought down nameplates 2010 Enhancement of existing Sync Function 2010 Enhancement of existing Sync Function 2009 Revenues came earlier than expectation 2009 Revenues came earlier than expectation 2010 Launch of small efficient cars 2010 Launch of small efficient cars 2008 Raise cash the old fashioned way, start relieving 2008 Raise cash the old fashioned way, start relieving 1998 Bestselling vehicle 1998 Bestselling vehicle 2006 Planned to perform cardiac resuscitation 2006 Planned to perform cardiac resuscitation III. Objective * To be able to identify why Ford committed failure * To be able to determine what are the competitive advantage of the company * To be able to discuss where to position the brand * To be able to help Mullaly in making decision * To enhance the reading and analytic skills of the student IV. Statement of problem 1...

Words: 1381 - Pages: 6

Ford

...1. Where would you put Ford in terms of competitive position? Why? Ford has dramatically enhanced their competitive position by developing a new marketing strategy and focusing on the Ford brand. Ford with the assistance of new CEO Alan Mullaly fought hard against bankruptcy and even harder to gain consuer trust in the comapny and the brand. Ford gained a competitive advantage especially in terms of customer satisfaction. 2. Is Ford a market-centered company? How can it improve in this area? Yes, it is market centered company Pays attention to both customers and competitors Need to pay attention to macro environment Following trend of automobile industry 3. How does Ford’s Sync contribute to its competitive advantage? Is this a sustainable advantage? Everything you need to stay in touch, be entertained and stay informed, plus the assurance of emergency assist Studies show that Sync drivers were much less likely to swerve out of their lanes than non-Sync drivers Ford customers cite voice command and touch screen features as top purchase drivers much more often than competitors; Ford Escape owners prioritize them twice as much as the segment average Ford improves Sync quality by more than 50 percent since launch, plans another upgrade in summer 2014 4. Can Mulally succeed with small world cars? Yes Ford prioritized the production of small cars in North America starting 2009 Ford’s focus shifted from SUVs and trucks production(70%) to the production......

Words: 291 - Pages: 2

Ford

...Conclusion………………………………………………………………………………….12-13 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Ford Motor Company is the second largest industrial automotive corporation in the world. Their operations span over 200 countries with more than $144 billion in revenues. Over the years, its market share has been on the decline due to the entrance of foreign-based auto manufacturers. They are also faced with over industry capacity and uses minimal technology in their process. In an effort to face competition, Ford is currently reviewing Dell’s Model of virtual integration to solve their supply chain bottlenecks. However, there were fundamental issues that needed to be addressed: (1) How would the virtual integration affect the operations of Ford in areas of ordering, quality control and distribution? (2) Should Ford completely Dell’s business model or which aspects would work best for Ford? (3) Could Dell’s cycle time and lead times be replicated into Ford’s automotive infrastructure and would the current technology at Ford support this? and (4) Would virtual integration be feasible in the automotive industry given the product characteristics and industry scope? It was found that emerging technologies, globalization of foreign-based auto manufacturers and intense industry competition caused Ford’s issues. Subsequently, there were two ways Ford could handle this: adopting the whole Dell’s business model or adapting aspects of the business model. It was recommended that Ford should adapt aspects of the......

Words: 2226 - Pages: 9

Ford

...The Case of the Ford Pinto By James Abstract Product harm crisis can be defined as a sudden break in a product’s life cycle (Siomkos, G.J and Kurzbard. J. 1994). In 1971 the Ford Motor Company created a product harm crisis with the introduction of the Ford Pinto. The Ford Pinto is known to be one of the most dangerous vehicles ever produced in automotive history due to several serious design flaws. This paper will identify the factors that contributed to the product harm crisis, compare and contrast the findings of various studies on a product harm crisis and finally synthesis the research findings and provide a post mortem recommendation to the Ford Motor Company on how the Ford Pinto product crisis should have been handled. The Case of the Ford Pinto In 1968 the Ford Motor Company decided to market a vehicle that was small, inexpensive and would appeal to all car buyers. The Vice President of Ford Motor Company at the time was Lee Iacocca. Mr. Iacocca approved the plan for the Ford Pinto based on the parameters of the car weighing 2000 pounds and costing $2,000.00 dollars (Danley J. 2005). By placing these parameters on the car’s designers, they were limited from the beginning and ended up with a failed product. The key factors that contributed to the product crisis included the Ford Pinto being rushed to production in twenty five months, the timeframe to production causing designers and producers of the car to cut corners and......

Words: 979 - Pages: 4

Ford

...Ford Pinto Case In the 1970’s the Ford Pinto was debuted. It was debuted without regards to safety features and concern for society. The biggest concern regarding the role the company played was the concern for cutting costs and the hunger for making the biggest profit exceeding other competitors. Proper corporate morals and principles laid out to be followed were severally jeopardized with the release of this new model. The lack of interest for human life initiated dozens of lawsuits against Ford Motor Company which in the end resulted in a far larger cost than it would have been installing a simple, low cost, safety feature to prevent the loss of lives to come. Ford was struggling to keep up with competitors and there solution was the Ford Pinto. From the beginning Lee Iacocca, CEO of ford, wanted this new model to be designed and produced fast. This is documented when they state “they only had 25 months rather than the usual 43 months for a new car line” (DeGeorge 298). After development and before the car is released to the market the car must go through a range of tests to make sure the vehicle meets motor safety guidelines. Ford did not follow protocol and released the Ford Pinto without testing. It wasn’t until after the car was released that Ford decided to test the vehicle. It was then they found that the rear-end impact failed in accordance to the standard safety procedures even though there was no National Highway Traffic Safety Administration rear-end impact......

Words: 817 - Pages: 4

Ford

...PEROLD On April 14, 2000, Ford Motor Co. announced a shareholder Value Enhancement Plan (VEP) to significantly recapitalize the firm’s ownership structure. Ford had accumulated $23 billion in cash reserves, close to the company’s largest ever cash position and significant relative to Ford’s $57 billion equity market capitalization. Under the VEP, Ford would return as much as $10 billion of this cash to shareholders. In exchange for each share currently held, the plan would give stockholders one new share plus the choice of receiving $20 either in cash or additional new Ford common shares. Ford also announced that it would distribute ownership of its Visteon Corp. parts unit to shareholders. Ford’s share price had performed poorly over the previous year (Exhibit 1), and the proposal drew a positive reaction from analysts who had been urging the company for months to distribute cash to stockholders. Some hailed the VEP as the boldest step yet by Ford Chairman William Clay Ford Jr. and Chief Executive Officer Jacques Nasser to convince investors that they were undervaluing the world’s No. 2 automaker. However, the plan raised a number of questions for investors. Why was Ford proposing this transaction instead of a traditional share repurchase or a cash dividend? How did the interests of the Ford family factor into this decision, and what did the transaction imply about the future involvement of the family in the company? Why was Ford distributing such a......

Words: 9505 - Pages: 39

Ford

...Ford Ford Motor Company is a global automotive industry leader based in Dearborn, Michigan, manufactures or distributes automobiles across six continents. With about 164,000 employees and about 70 plants worldwide, the company’s automotive brands include Ford and Lincoln. (North America, South America, Europe, Africa, Asian Pacific, and the Middle East) The company provides financial services through Ford Motor Credit Company. Ford is also focused on accelerating the development of new products that customers want and value. From fun-to-drive, fuel-efficient cars all the way to versatile, capable utility vehicles and tough, durable trucks that work harder and last longer, Ford offers a full line of high-quality products with global appeal. The price of a new Ford vehicle is all over the place, with the lowest base model price is about $13,500, the Ford Focus, and the most expensive base model price is about $95,000, Ford GT. Those prices are without any discounts, grants, or taxes. They also do not include any special features; the price is set on the base model. Ford was founded in June 16, 1903 by Henry Ford. Their mission statement is “to deliver great products, create a strong business and make the world a better place.” For has been around for 109 years, they have stuck to their mission statement and they have stuck to their core values, which are as followed; Integrity- “We conduct our business with fairness, honesty and transparency so that we can at all times......

Words: 1399 - Pages: 6

Ford

...Strategic Strategy for Ford Introduction The proposed strategy will enable Ford to enhance the performance in the global environment. This will also ensure Ford survival and strengthen the financial restraints that are currently evident as a result of the current global economic recession. The proposed strategy will be determined by scanning the internal environment in terms of resources, capabilities and competences. The external environment in terms of the macro environment and market environment with regards to opportunities and threats will also be evaluated. Lastly, the strategic strategy must measure to the stakeholder expectations, as well as the inherent market related risks. 1. STRATEGIC DIRECTION SETTING 1. MISSION Ford Motor Company Mission Statement- One Mission,One Team,One Plan,One Goal. One Mission: FORD ONE TEAM- People working together as a lean, global enterprise for automotive leadership, as measured by: Customer, Employee, Dealer, Investor, Supplier, Union/Council, and Community Satisfaction ONE PLAN – FORD F- Future First Affordable choice of Automotive transportation regardless of Industry and according to consumer needs O- Outstanding Investments and returns for all R- Revolutionising the product offering according to consumer demands (Service Plan offerings) D- Drive train eco technology development- best smallest engine and lowest gas emissions globally ONE GOAL - An exciting viable Ford delivering profitable growth......

Words: 2092 - Pages: 9