Managment vs. Leadership

In: Business and Management

Submitted By skelima
Words 1745
Pages 7
Sunday Lima
Management vs. Leadership
October 21, 2010
University of Phoenix
Dr. Ewa Usowicz

Management vs. Leadership
Many people tend to think that management and leadership are similar. Good managers are not always good leaders. Managers usually can perform their management responsibilities successfully but not show that they are great leaders as well. To be able to lead effectively will allow a successful to stand out from the average ones. A manager deals with the everyday tasks of the organization such as planning, organizing, and controlling but when you are a great leader you are able to make effective changes within the workplace. Leading involves setting an example, direction and also creating a visual of the goals that must be met. Management involves organizing the structure of the company, hiring good people to complete the work, and also monitoring events and activities. Leadership keeps employees motivated to overcome obstacles and focus on building the organization towards its potential future. The typical manager tends to focus on the daily activities and short-term profits. They usually do things as they come along. This is fine if your goal is just to manage, but if you are looking advance and reach long-term goals then you must focus on being a leader to your subordinates. (Bateman)
To be a great leader and manager you cannot have one without the other. Managers must perform their tasks or else the organization can become ineffective and unorganized. Leadership on the other hand involves special processes that are distinguishable from basic management processes. Therefore, if one manager can master both roles effectively this can result in success.(Bateman) An example of a great leader is Mary Kay Ash. Ash shaped a flourishing cosmetics company by and for women by utilizing a nonstop sales power and original

motivational sales…...

Similar Documents

Effective Leadership and Managment in Nursing

...Effective Leadership and Management in NursingIn: Other Topics Effective Leadership and Management in Nursing Effective Leadership and Management in Nursing Shirley J. Mitchell University of Phoenix HSC 492 Instructor: Linda Westermann March 12, 2012 Effective Leadership and Management in Nursing According to Sullivan and Decker (2009), leadership is influencing others into working toward accomplishing a common goal. Some people are born with an innate leadership quality within them. Others require learning leadership and management skills. It takes a certain personality trait that makes them a natural leader. Intelligence, personality, and abilities are three categories of the trait theory that is a part of the profile of successful leaders (Sullivan & Decker, 2009). I will discuss my personal views of leadership. It will describe how leadership differs from management. Finally, the characteristics of an effective leader will disclose. What are your personal views of leadership? Everyone is a leader at one time or another. A good leader is one that knows just when to pull back from the leadership role and let the team proceed on his or her own. These leaders have a natural ability to guide their team effectively with his or her charismatic approach that the team believes they are well supported. They know when to lead, when not to lead, when to let the team lead, and they know just when to dance. How does leadership differ from......

Words: 497 - Pages: 2

Transactional vs. Transformational Leadership

...Transactional Leadership vs. Transformational Leadership: What’s My Style? John E. Kaiser MADS 6661-82: Managing Organizational Change Fairleigh Dickinson University After researching and evaluating the differences between Transactional and Transformational Leadership styles I believe that I practice more of the Transformational style, however, there are certain situations that do necessitate the use of Transactional Leadership. As has been said time and time again by “leadership theorists”, no one style of leadership is perfect for all situations; effective leadership requires the ability to understand and practice a number of leadership styles depending on the situation. I believe that the Transformational style is more employee centered and employee enabling in that its focus is on the overall improvement and achievement of both the organization and the employee. Transformational Leadership allows for the empowerment of the employee, through his or her own focus and abilities on self improvement and growth. It allows for the employee to grow through their own motivations and desires as being a stakeholder in their own destiny within the organization. Unfortunately, the Transformational style is not for every employee, or rather, every employee may not have the self motivation for self improvement not only for themselves but also for the betterment of the organization. There are those times......

Words: 429 - Pages: 2

Servant Leadership vs. Traditional Leadership

...Clinton Richardson Servant Leadership vs. Traditional Leadership CA 233 Introduction to Leadership Professor Caroline Heckman Leadership has been thought to be a trait, ability, a skill, a behavior, a relationship and an influenced process. There are general descriptions of leadership that can be broken down into many forms. While the traditional style of leadership still exist and is very prevalent, there are several modern leadership styles that have been created throughout the years. One modern style of leadership is servant leadership. This may actually sound like an oxymoron because how can you be a servant and leader at the same time. However, this leadership has been found to very effective in some settings. There has been a rise in new forms of leadership style due to people feeling that the traditional style of leadership just doesn’t work anymore. Traditional leadership has evolved to so many different forms of leadership one that will be discussed specifically is servant leadership. First, I will compare the basis of each type of leadership. I will then compare how both styles of leaders interact to their team and how their team respects them. Lastly, I will also explore the pros can cons of each leadership style. Leadership has evolved throughout the years and it is important to recognize the effectiveness of new forms of leadership. This paper will compare and contrast the values, attributes, interaction and team moral of traditional and......

Words: 2690 - Pages: 11

Leadership and Team Managment

...they are having a problem and need technical advice. He almost never tells someone to do something in a directive way. Instead, he suggests various ways to deal with a problem or he shows them how he would have handled it. When not busy with administrative responsibilities, Alan enjoys working alongside his mechanics, where he is available to answer any questions about the work. Alan’s style of leadership suits his easy going personality. Alan also encourages his employees to participate in making decisions such as what new equipment to purchase or how to improve quality. They know that Alan is sincere in asking for their opinions and is not just doing it as a manipulative strategy to minimize their opposition to decisions that have already been made. Alan’s fairness and openness have earned him the continuing respect and trust of his employees. Questions 1. What is the usual leadership situation in the auto repair shop (consider the nature of the task, subordinates, and environment)? 2. Describe Alan’s typical leadership style and evaluate whether it is appropriate for the leadership situation. Part 2 Alan looked anxiously out of his office window. The sky was very dark over the nearby hills and storm seemed to be advancing rapidly towards the valley where his auto repair shop was located .Just to be on the safe side, Alan went out and rolled up the window of the customer’s cars in the parking lot. He noticed the creek was already running high, the result of melting......

Words: 1458 - Pages: 6

Management vs. Leadership

...Leadership vs. Management Laura Rouse-DeVore The relationship between Leadership and Management is, perhaps, one of the most impactful and significant relationships that exists in organizations currently. The intersection and overlap of management and leadership, in addition to the polarity between the two are ideas that have been studied for many years. One certainty is that management and leadership go hand-in-hand. (What is the difference between Management and Leadership?, n.d.) (Cox and Miner, 2013) What is Management? Defining management as a term is an essential step to establishing how management and leadership relate to each other. Management involves the direction of a group of employees or individual towards the achievement of certain outcomes and specified performance indicators. Management is centered around results and the structures, processes, and principles employed for that group to meet those goals and achieve the desired results. Management utilizes formal hierarchial structure and positions of authority to establish power in the group. (Leadership vs. Management, n.d.) The Composition of Leadership Although the terms, “management” and......

Words: 934 - Pages: 4

Managment and Leadership

...Management and Leadership Management versus Leadership is an often discussed topic. Some believe that both are the same and others believe they are completely different. Managers can be leaders and leaders can be managers. Some people are better managers than leaders and vice versa. Managers and leaders have many different responsibilities within any organization. Both are needed to create and maintain a health organizational culture. Managers tend to be thought of as ones who deal with the day-to-day tasks of an organization, whereas leaders can effect change in people. True leaders inspire others to do things and motivate them to keep going. Managers give the method to change and organize how it will be done. There are many great managers who are also great leaders. There are also many great managers who are not great leaders and great leaders who are not great managers. “According to the current wisdom, managers are principally administrators—they write business plans, set budgets and monitor progress. Leaders on the other hand, get organizations and people to change. That's true, as far as it goes, but there is a more useful distinction between management and leadership: Management is a function that must be exercised in any business, leadership is a relationship between leader and led that can energize an organization.” (Maccoby 2000) Due to the differences and similarities between managers and leaders, it needs to be brought to everyone’s attention......

Words: 1157 - Pages: 5

Leadership vs. Managment

...Leadership vs. Management What is a leader? “A leader is a person who has a vision, a drive and a commitment to achieve that vision, and the skills to make it happen. Let's look at each of those in detail. A leader has a vision. Leaders see a problem that needs to be fixed or a goal that needs to be achieved. It may be something that no one else sees or simply something that no one else wants to tackle. Whatever it is, it is the focus of the leader's attention and they attack it with a single-minded determination.” (About.com Management-What is a leader, F John Reh) Leadership also has the ability to inspire others to achieve more of the organizations goals. They instill confidence within the group to achieve the goals. Leading is also a critical part of the manager’s position so what is a manager. In simple terms leaders set the direction for the team, division or company. The leader is responsible for the company’s vision. What is a manager? “A Manager is the person responsible for planning and directing the work of a group of individuals, monitoring their work, and taking corrective action when necessary. For many people, this is their first step into a management career.” (About.com-Management Manager, F John Reh) The manager handles the day to day business. The manager ensures that everything consistently runs smoothly. The manager is responsible for insuring that things get done. The manager supports leadership, in some respects a duty of the manager is to......

Words: 550 - Pages: 3

Leadership vs Managment

...Generally organizations are complex entities often very difficult to control and to administer. In this sense “key persons” like Leaders and Managers are vital parts of an organization. But what is leadership, what is management and what is the difference between them? Maxwell defines leadership as an “influence - nothing more, nothing less.” and a leader’s purpose according to Kent is “to create direction and the unified will to pursue to through the development of people’s thinking and valuing”. One of the most interesting phenomena in companies is that employees are afraid of the “change” (Prashant Bordia, Effects of poor Change Management history on employee attitudes and turnover). Taking an example of my personal working experience as a team leader, I had to make some changes, in the development tool that we used. The new one was more effective than the previous and it had the option to generate and reuse code from the modeling process. Nevertheless its benefits, the team were not convinced about the effectiveness of the new development platform. In order to accomplish that, I had to create a new framework and directions in order to convince them that they will do their job more effective and more timeless. After having stated what Leadership is, now we have to define what Management is. Management is the science that can be defined by building a communication framework throughout the enterprise which conveys on to the proper centre of perception and......

Words: 549 - Pages: 3

Management vs Leadership

...MANAGEMENT VS. LEADERSHIP Management vs. Leadership Leadership can be defined as the ability to direct the operations, activity, or performance of others. A leader is an individual who leads, guides or inspires others. A leader is someone who will take charge of a group or be vocal amongst others. However, to be a leader, one must not only have the ability to take charge or be vocal, but also must have the respect of others in the group, team, or organization. With leadership, perception is the better part of reality: Being a good leader may be difficult if followers do not perceive the individual as one (Altar 2006). A leader must know what his or her followers think. Most important leaders will say that leadership ability is the single most important personal attribute that one needs to succeed. Leadership has many facets to its name. Some of the most important leadership skills are communication and relationship building. One trait that is not characteristic of a good leader is dominance. When a leader tries to dictate, they will lose respect from others. A commanding style of leadership in not recommended, but rather have one who can win hearts and minds. In the present, many organizations are putting their employees through different leadership development programs. "Companies with effective processes for assessing individual leadership development needs were significantly more likely to have recorded an increase in sales and net income between 2003 and 2004"......

Words: 1412 - Pages: 6

Leadership vs Management

...Leadership versus Management Every company has leaders and managers, and sometimes they are the same person. Leaders are those who can motivate and inspire others to perform at their best to get the job done. Managers are those in charge who organize and make sure that things get done, not necessarily worry about popularity or unity within the group (Brown, 2010) (DuBrin, 2010). • Those put in a position of power over others, either a manager position or a leadership position must have the qualities that will benefit the company in those roles. • Leaders are those who work hard and perform positive results and in doing so are able to bring out the best in others around them. Leading by example is a key trait of a leader and not necessarily that of a manager in charge. • A manager is the key person is in a position of authority over others and they are the one who has the ability to get a task done and stay on schedule. Popularity with subordinates may not be the primary goal of finding a manger but one who is task and detail oriented. • Leaders may not always be good managers. Leaders tend to get the job done through a different approach than managers. Leaders evoke the feelings of determination and quality work in others which is not always accomplished under time constraints. The job gets done but in no set time. • Managers set goals and expectations for the group to get done and the group is expected to perform. This is where having a good...

Words: 752 - Pages: 4

Management vs Leadership

...Management VS Leadership Bianca Fontanez MGT 321 Assessing Leadership Skills Professor Jessica Cossette September 1, 2014 Management VS Leadership Differentiating between a manager and a leader is not an easy task for many people think they are one in the same. For any person would say, “Aren’t they both leaders?” However, this is not the case. There are many cases in which a manger forgets that they must also be a leader. It is possible for a person to be a manager and a leader. Leaders are integral parts of organization as well as managers. Therefore, it is interesting to find that any person can be a leader whereas managers are those appointed to a power of position. A leader can be a sales person, a CEO, or any other member of a work force. Both leaders and managers are necessary parts of an organization. There are people who are natural leaders. These individuals can be found in any position, and people will willingly follow them. There are often times where a good leader will not be a good manager. It turns out that managers and leaders are not often found within the same individual. The key difference in a leadership role is that people willingly follow them. People believe in what the message is and willingly do what is being requested of them. On the other hand, a manager may demand results whereas the productivity will not be as high being that people do not believe in their work (Brown, 2010). The manager ensures all work is done in a timely......

Words: 989 - Pages: 4

Leadership vs Management

...LEADERSHIP VS MANAGEMENT In an organization, questions always arise about the most effective way to run a business so that it can be successful. We often think about the great idea that makes the business in top, the good structure and strategy of the organization made by managers, the fruit of a teamwork, the way directors lead and so much more. All these are true, but the point is whatever activity the organization aims for, how better the strategy and structure are, how great the idea is, without this person who influence, inspire and energize the group to reach a common goal, the organization remains managed but not enough in an effective way. In fact, the success of a business depends on how efficient the leader builds up a culture work in order to incite the group to seek commitment. That is why, leadership is important, as the surplus component of management. In general, management has the duty to plan, organize and coordinate but in term of leadership, a leader produces inspiration and motivation to influence people’s actions towards management. Leader is visionary that makes all company works towards and keep going until achievement. Therefore, not all managers are leaders but all leaders are managers. So, the battle between the best manager and the best leader cannot really take a stand because they are complementary if the organization wants to be successful in an effective way. (Ricketts, 2009) Although they are complementary, their competences......

Words: 595 - Pages: 3

Leadership Managment

...what my purpose is. I will tell you what I found to be my purpose but first I will tell you about the three topics that impacted me the most this semester (I thought I would leave you in suspense). The first topic that I found interesting was making the difference between a leader and a manager. This distinction helped me to think differently about what it means to be a leader. Before I thought of a leader as more of a manager; which may have confused me when people thought I had leadership qualities. Of course I would be thrown off by peoples comments about being a leader when I did not fully understand what a leader was. I learned that a leader was someone that could envision, enable, and energize . A leader had the ability to convince others to follow. This is the very reason why the last job I worked there was a lack of a team atmosphere. My last job there was no leadership which meant that there was no direction for the employees. Yeah sure we had some good managers but without strong leadership there was no sense of direction. This distinction between managers and leaders showed me how both are required to run a successful business. Most importantly this topic showed me how being a leader could further my purpose. The second topic that had a significant impact on me was the organization of teams. This topic changed the way that i viewed group work. I am more of an introvert, which is why it is no surprise that I prefer to work alone. However, the concept of a......

Words: 1456 - Pages: 6

Leadership: Nature vs. Nurture

...Leadership: Nature vs. Nurture Kathleen Jessee BUS318: Organizational Behavior Professor Thomas Tonkin May 25, 2015 Leadership: Nature vs. Nurture Even though leadership can be learned, science has found that most leaders have a genetic commonality. Interestingly, leadership means the most within an organizational context. Leader follower relationships are one of the ways leadership behavior evolves and is defined. The two most common leadership roles are the charismatic role and the instrumental role. The charismatic role empasises vision, inspires a sense of pride, and encourages respect between the leader and follower. The charismatic role is a transformational leadership model. Envolving the expanding the followers interests and facilitating followers to perform for the overall good of everyone. (Schermerhorn, 2012). Instrumental leaders show a propensity to develop strategy and set procuedures in motion. In addition, the instrumental leader uses all means available to the achievement of organizational goals. While science has shown that most successful leaders have both charisma and instrumental tendencies, these traits alone are not enough to become an effective leader. Reasearch literature has been full of information regarding the qualities of different leadership traits and how they influence change within an organization. It is important to note that, it would be irresponsible not to address how leaders develop mastery of the leadership skill set......

Words: 1330 - Pages: 6

Managment vs Leadership

...Management Vs Leadership Question 1)Which leadership aspects from the prior slide do each of the above vignettes illustrate? Plan, Setting Direction/Vision = “First, I met with the people- and listened. Then, at our initial team meeting, I talked about how things were going to change, and why. There were a lot of doubting Thomas’ then, but not anymore.” Organize, Communicating Vision/Aligning People = Each quarter, I show the employees as much financial information as I do the bankers. I also brought in trainers to teach them financial principles– they operated a lemonade stand. This helped, because they had all thought we must be making money because they saw so much product shipping-when in fact we were near bankruptcy.” Direct,Control, Motivation/Inspiration = In a 450 person division, the COO knew each person’s first name and something about their personal background. All were on a first name basis with him. He had helped one of the forklift drivers solve a personal problem involving the driver’s son. The COO’s comment to me on all of the above: “That’s the price you pay to be a leader.” Question 2) If you worked at this Company, would these experiences make you more or less motivated to do well by the Company, or not have much effect? Business owners often face a mammoth challenge to keep their people motivated at work, especially in environments that fail to make employee satisfaction a part of their core business strategy....

Words: 341 - Pages: 2