Liberalism Philosophy

In: Philosophy and Psychology

Submitted By plugnplay
Words 1853
Pages 8
Slide 1
- Ideology founded on the natural goodness of humans and the autonomy of the individual and favoring civil and political liberties, government by law with the consent of the governed, and protection from arbitrary authority.

- advocates limited government, constitutionalism, rule of law, due process, individual liberties including freedom of religion, speech, press, assembly, and free markets Slide 2
Liberalism started as a major doctrine and intellectual endeavour in response to the religious wars gripping Europe during the 16th and 17th centuries, up until the cold war
• Liberalism as a specifically named ideology begins in the late 18th century as a movement towards self-government and away from aristocracy. It included the ideas of self-determination, the primacy of the individual and the nation, as opposed to the family, the state, and religion, as being the fundamental units of law, politics and economy.
• Liberalism first became a powerful force in the Age of Enlightenment, rejecting several foundational assumptions that dominated most earlier theories of government, such as nobility, established religion, absolute monarchy, and the Divine Right of Kings.
• The first notable incarnation of liberal unrest came with the American Revolution, and liberalism fully flowered as a comprehensive movement against the old order during the French Revolution, which set the pace for the future development of human history.
• The early liberal thinker John Locke, who is often credited for the creation of liberalism as a distinct philosophical tradition, employed the concept of natural rights and the social contract to argue that the rule of law should replace absolutism in government, that rulers were subject to the consent of the governed, and that private individuals had a fundamental right to life, liberty, and property.
• Developed a theory…...

Similar Documents


...inequality, suppression of developing economies and contribution to financial crisis due to destabilizing capital flows. This paper will contrast the implied positive effects of neo-liberalism from a Keynesian perspective against a Marxist analysis which suggests such economic liberalism merely changes the time intervals and severity of inevitable boom and bust cycles of capitalism and as such makes no permanent progression in the global economy. Displacement of the Keynesian welfare state policy approach was embedded in end of the long boom. Rising worker militancy and diminishing productivity gave way to severe cost-push inflation, compounded by oil price spikes leading to criticism of aggregate demand management as policy makers sought a structural solution. Neo-liberal policies, with theoretical origins in individual utility maximization (Mill and Bentham) and Adam Smith’s Laissez-Faire optimality imply a reduced role of government in reliance on the free market to provide the most efficient outcome. Development of a neo-liberal state would then encompass privatization of Government owned enterprises, deregulation of financial markets and redistribution of income from the poor to the rich in attempt to boost private investment and job creation through the trickle-down effect. A Marxist view of neo-liberalism would hold that it is merely a justification for increasing profits and a class struggle between workers and capitalists will always exist. Kalecki holds that the......

Words: 754 - Pages: 4

Socialism and Liberalism

...Socialism and Liberalism For hundreds of years people have been developing ideas on how governments should function and interact with their citizens. These ideas have run the gamut of possibilities from governments that control every aspect of life to governments with limited power where individual liberty is encouraged. Two ideologies that gained prominence in the 17th and 18th centuries were Liberalism and Socialism. Socialism is an ideology where citizens are best served by policies focused on meeting the basic needs of the entire society rather than by policies focused on serving the needs of individuals as individuals. (Grigsby, 2011) Liberalism arose from the writings of John Locke who believed in a limited government and protection of the rights of individuals, this is known as Classical Liberalism. This theory was expanded on in the 19th century and became known as Modern Liberalism. Modern liberals believe in an interventionist government and expansive liberty. (Grigsby, 2011) In recent years in the United States, some have tried to make these two ideologies synonymous. While they may share some characteristics these two ideologies are not the same. Socialism is not Liberalism and Liberalism is not Socialism. Interventionist government and expansive liberty are the two main points of Modern Liberalism. An interventionist government is government that takes a role in regulating economic and social interactions. (Grigsby, 2011) Expansive liberty is......

Words: 705 - Pages: 3

Neo-Liberalism and the Third Way

...Essay Topic One: Explain some of the criticisms of neo liberalism and economic rationalism. How is the third way seen as an advance on neo liberalism and what do critics make of the third way? Neo liberalism and the Third Way Neo liberalism and economic rationalism, synonymous with globalisation, gained prominence during the 1990s as a political ideology that espoused free markets as a method of not only handling affairs of nations, but also as political ideology that can be applied with all sorts of governance issues (Hartman 2005, pp.57-59). The idea was that “market forces would motivate workers and produce a vibrant economy” and that “government interference” through “high taxation and investment in the public sector services, lessened individual freedom and hindered a nations economic progress” (Rees 1994, p.172). Emphasis was placed on costs to the government being shifted back to private individuals and markets (Hartman 2005, p. 59). This would create a situation where markets would flourish with increased competition and reducing the tax burden (Hartman 2005, p.59). This came at the cost of the social state (Rees 1994, pg.171) as countries sought to create “market friendly, liberalized, lean, decentralised, customer orientated, managerial and democratic state[s],” (Bangura 2000, p.17). In Australia the conversion of public services into market commodities and increased privatisation of public provisions (Jimrozik 2005, p.42) found a scapegoat in the welfare state......

Words: 2881 - Pages: 12


...In the United States, political ideology is governed by the philosophy of democracy, and economic ideology is governed by capitalism. It is widely accepted that these two concepts dictate public policy, and they are usually regarded as symbolizing “freedom” or seen as the reason for America’s success as a nation. Not very often in our society do citizens speak out against our system of government or question if democracy and capitalism are “worth” it. Democracy and capitalism are an effective form of government, but they do come with “costs” or negative effects on public policy. Democracy is a system of government in which the people are in power, either directly or indirectly. In the U.S., the power falls in the hands of elected officials. Some would argue that this system of indirect democracy is not ideal because the “majority” makes important decisions, while the “minority” gets left behind. Indirect democracy is faulted because it is impossible to take in consideration each citizen’s wants and needs. Capitalism has been under attack for many different reasons; some would say that the costs of capitalism are very grave. A few of the disadvantages of capitalism are inequality, advertisement, and waste. Capitalism promotes inequality because it allows the “rich” to get richer and the “poor” to get poorer; naturally the wealthy will have an excess of stuff and it will lead to waste. Capitalism also causes advertising to be very abundant in our society which can lead to......

Words: 323 - Pages: 2


...On what grounds have liberals defended constitutionalism? Liberals see constitutionalism as the practice of a limited government brought about by the existence of a constitution. The liberal support for constitutionalism is separated into two forms; external and internal constraints. This is important within liberalism because it allows the individual to be free from restrictions and stop the threat on individual liberty. External constraints limit powers of the government bodies and politicians, usually through legal checks. The most notable of which is a written constitution, this codifies what the government institutions can and cannot do. A written constitutional is written down in one single document, for example the US constitution. Within liberalism protecting the individual is most important aspect. Therefore liberals defends constitutionalism because an external constraint entrenches individual right by providing legal definition about the relationship between the state and the individuals themselves. The US constitution refers to this as the “bill of rights”. If there are no legal constraints, the government could act to benefit themselves at the expense of others. Internal constraints disperse the power among a number of institutions. This in turn creates a network of “checks and balances”. Montesquieu stated that “power should be a check to power”. Liberals defend constitutionalism because it stops the development of absolute authority or dictatorial power......

Words: 356 - Pages: 2

Liberalism and Socialsim

...Comparing two Ideologies Liberalism and Socialism Danny Milla Political Science Modern Theory Professor James Stone May 10, 2014 Introduction During the 20th Century the old type of economic system Feudalism, became virtually extinct. At this time two powerful economic systems came to be. First the command economy, which involved more government control of the economy, and second was the market type which believed in free trade and no regulation. This led to a new economic world order which changed the ideologies at the time. Socialism is regarded as the more left wing radicalization of liberalism. Socialism starts on the normative principles that started the bourgeois revolution. Liberal society seeks to embody these ideals of freedom, free trade, and capitalism. Socialism is a more extreme way of pushing forward for liberalism. As Etienne Balibar would say Liberalism’s core values liberty and equality exist in a state of tension with their supposed intentions in the structure of liberal society. This results in a struggle that tends to outrun the limits of liberal capitalism. For Americans socialism and liberalism have a distinct relationship. That binds the economic power into a market, which allows for trade and profit. But after this the ideologies of liberalism and socialism come into effect. Yet for the Europeans especially the left wing for them the idea of a relationship between these two is scandalous. Liberals see socialists as......

Words: 627 - Pages: 3

Gandhian Liberalism

...Gandhian liberalism M. K. Gandhi (1869-1948) requires no introduction even to the layman. “The Father of the Nation”,”Bapu”, and numerous other honorifics have long been affectionately applied to him by the citizens of India. His appearance on the Indian political scene in 1915 changed the face of Indian liberalism and made him the most influential and prominent liberal in India and I aim to shed more light on his theory of liberalism in this section of the essay. Gandhi acknowledged Gopal Krishna Gokhale as his political mentor. He took Gokhale’s strict liberal position and adapted it to fit what he believed to be India’s needs. The most radical departure was that Gandhi believed that the only way to ensure the British acceded to Indian demands was by non-violent protest or what he termed “Satyagraha”, unlike the traditional liberal who strictly adhered to the system and never attempted to work against it. Simply put, the liberals that preceded Gandhi such as Gokhale and Ranade were heavily shaped by western liberal movements and the British Whigs while he was able to provide Indian liberalism with its own distinct ideas. Gandhi heavily emphasised features of negative liberty in his agenda for the political, social and economic transformation of India. He favoured a government which was minimalistic in nature and occupied itself with maintaining law and order. He strongly believed in the maximum freedom of the individual as well. One distinctive feature of his thinking......

Words: 429 - Pages: 2


...D’Andrea Coulter Traina Government 2305 09/10/10 Liberalism “If by a “liberal” they mean someone who looks ahead and not behind, someone who welcomes new ideas without ridged reactions, someone who cares about the welfare of the people – their health, their housing, their schools, their jobs, their civil rights, and their civil liberties- someone who believes we can break through the stalemate and suspicions that grip us in our policies abroad, if that is what they mean by a “liberal” then I’m proud to say I’m a liberal” – John F. Kennedy Liberalism “is a political philosophy or worldview founded on ideas of liberty and equality.” (Girvetz). Liberals stand for the protection of individuals from being harmed by others and who better to protect these individuals then the government. However, they have their cons about government. Liberals notice it’s possible that the government can be a threat to liberty. They believe in the system that makes sure the government protect the citizens of America, but prevents those who governs the people not to abuse their power. The different schools of political thought that fall under the banner of liberalism are that liberals have many ideas that they support such as free and fair elections, private property, civil rights, religion, freedom of the press, sex education, paying taxes, social programs (like food stamps, social security and health care…etc.), and free trade. Liberalism and conservatism make the two major......

Words: 681 - Pages: 3


...In 19th century dramatic effects of Industrial Revolution prompted the rise of Classical or "Utilitarian" Liberalism throughout Europe and United States. The foundation of this new social philosophy was the rule of law designed for protecting the freedom of the individual, which required some restrictions placed on the power of the government. The idea of a limited government involvement led to the concept of a deregulated economy, which was supported by the emerging field of political economy, or classical economics. Eventually, by the end of the century, Liberalism evolved into so-called Social Darwinism, which took the principles of small government and economic liberty to their absolute. This new form of liberal thinking argued that the principle of "Survival of the Fittest" was applicable and in fact beneficial to the society as a whole. Apparent ruthlessness associated with such an approach was justified by claiming this to be the only way our society could progress. Overall, the deregulated economic environment of United States in early 20th century ultimately brought forward the Great Depression of 1930s. It was the Great Depression that made Franklin D. Roosevelt's the New Deal a reality. This vast and comprehensive set of policies was the first venture of United States government into the realm of Welfare State, which manifested in government-provided relief and aid targeted at unemployed and distressed citizens. In 1965 President Lyndon B. Johnson built upon......

Words: 352 - Pages: 2


...promotion of constitutional reform. Discuss. (30) Individual rights are at both the centre of liberal philosophy and liberal party politics. From the days of classical liberalism, Locke discussed natural rights. The libertarian strand of liberalism with Nozick focuses on entitlement rights. The modern day Liberal Democrats state ‘the protection of civil liberties are at the heart of our purpose and philosophy’. Human rights help individuals gain freedom and liberty thus liberals must protect them. Also constitutional reform has been long connected to liberalism due to liberals fear of state power and want for individual freedom. Moreover, constitutional reform places balances and checks on government. The lib-dems have kept their loyalty to a more representative voting system within the coalition, shown through their instigation of the AV referendum in 2011. Human rights are rights that everyone is entitled to despite citizenship, for example freedom of speech. Lockes natural rights embodies human rights. Bentham dismissed natural rights as ‘nonsense on stilts’ stating that rights were but the child of law. The Lib-Dems support for Labours Human Rights Act shows protection of human rights/naturals rights but creating legislation. Modern liberals place rights to groups, not only individuals as the classical liberals promote, such as homosexuals in order to achieve equality of opportunity. The Liberals democrat party in the UK has shown its close association with the......

Words: 376 - Pages: 2

Liberalism and Change

...Justina Weston Latin American Liberalism and Change After the 1850s, liberals made a major comeback. They jumpstarted the social and economic changes that had been at a standstill during the independence struggle. There was a major upgrade in everything with every day activities. The liberal reaction had people wanting more. Landowners wanted greater export possibilities and urban dwellers wanted public works. With the Industrialization in Europe came increased Latin American markets, a new wave of European investment in Latin America and new ways of transportation such as steam and steel. Steamships replaced the older wood sailing ships. They were faster and were able to hold more cargo. The steam-powered railroad replaced mules and carts for land transports. The steam-powered railroads were able to transport more exportable materials than the mules and carts could. Although the railroads were expensive, they were very valuable. It opened access to new areas and created agricultural booms. Telegraph lines also enhanced means of communication. They carried electricity all around the country. In 1874, the transAtlantic telegraph connected Brazil to Europe. Columbia, Chile, and Central America also joined the Liberal Trend after Europe. Columbia was considered conservative before granted independence. Liberal resurgence happened in the 1850s. Jesuits were expelled again, fuero was removed, tithes were made voluntary and divorces were legalized. Tomas Cipriano de......

Words: 328 - Pages: 2

The Evolution of Liberalism in Latin America

...1 5114044 Liberalism was the dominant political and economic theory of the world throughout the enlightenment and that gave way to many economic and social advances. In particular the 19th century saw an increase both in the literature associated with this movement and the amount of leaders that nominally subscribed to this theory. In Latin America, specifically, liberalism took a very unique path that culminated in the abandonment and complete rejection of these theories. The adoption of liberal policies both economically and socially moved from adhering very strictly to the theory at first (whilst being disconnected from reality) to the eventual degradation and disassociation of liberal ideals around the 1930’s. The initial adoption was due to the closeness of Latin American intellectuals with their European and American counterparts, while the shift towards autochthonous movements was caused as a response against the ever-present influence of Europe over the Latin American subcontinent and the effects of positivism. Liberalism is defined by a set of policies, ideas, and beliefs that hold individual autonomy, equality, and freedom as the pillars of human life. From this basic concept the economic ideas of laissez-faire economics and free markets are developed. Further on, democracy naturally stems from this idea that people are autonomous, rational, free agents that are capable of having decision making power and thus elect the best person possible......

Words: 1593 - Pages: 7


...Part of a series on Liberalism Development[show] Ideas[show] Variants[show] People[show] Organizations[show] • Liberalism portal • Politics portal • v • t • e • 1. • • • • • • • • • • Words such as liberal, liberty, libertarian, and libertine all trace their history to the Latin liber, which means "free". One of the first recorded instances of the word liberal occurs in 1375, when it was used to describe the liberal arts in the context of an education desirable for a free-born man.[13] The word's early connection with the classical education of a medieval university soon gave way to a proliferation of different denotations and connotations. Liberal could refer to "free in bestowing" as early as 1387, "made without stint" in 1433, "freely permitted" in 1530, and "free from restraint"—often as a pejorative remark—in the 16th and the 17th centuries.In 16th century England, liberal could have positive or negative attributes in referring to someone's generosity or indiscretion.[13] In Much Ado About Nothing, Shakespeare wrote of "a liberal villaine" who "hath...confest his vile encounters".[13] With the rise of the Enlightenment, the word acquired decisively more positive undertones, being defined as "free from narrow prejudice" in 1781 and "free from bigotry" in 1823.[13] In 1815, the first use of the word liberalism appeared in English.[14] In Spain, the Liberales, the first group to use the liberal label in a......

Words: 2991 - Pages: 12

Liberalism and Conervative

...government or has to interfere with capitalism for the good of the people. Capitalism is said to create the greatest good for the greatest number of people. Liberals say that if capitalism isn’t regulated it creates poverty, which doesn’t create the greatest good for the greatest number. In the eyes of Conservatives property and having the freedom in the market is at top of the list, however Liberals defend social welfare and the safeguarding of the economy. To the Liberal, governments interaction in the market isn’t trespassing our natural rights but is actually protecting the whole society. The role of the government is to ensure a descent standard of living for the good of people. Liberalism is created to avoid capitalism from destroying it self and to enforce the idea of equal opportunity. This philosophy is still based on respecting basic property rights and due process. Liberals seek additional help from the state in areas of the environment, education, training, transportation, communication, and to enhance science and the arts. In Keynes’s view, the individualism of people will create problems that can only be solved with collective action through the state. He believed that constructive government action was both practical and required to handle tribulations that the invisible hand would not set right. There is little difference of how Conservatives and Liberals think on how prices are set, supply and demand. However, the issue of monopolies needs government......

Words: 1111 - Pages: 5

Liberalism Debate

...Vincent Serrecchia Professor Cruz Latino Politics 28 February 2012 Debate Paper #2 According to Webster’s dictionary, the definition of liberalism is as follows, “a political philosophy based on belief in progress, the essential goodness of the human race, and the autonomy of the individual and standing for the protection of political and civil liberties.” The first known use of liberalism in our society was in 1819, and from then on it has always claimed to stand for the greatest social good. As for liberalism being incompatible with identity politics, I disagree. I believe identity politics is compatible with liberalism. Liberalism is considered democracy free while identity politics focus on the self-interest and perspectives of self-identified groups. My first experience with a Latino politics debate wasn’t exactly positive because it made me nervous knowing I had to express my views towards the question that was assigned to our debate. At the beginning of the debate I was a little nervous to speak my opinion because I felt that I did not know enough about the Latino culture, as well as having a hard time understanding the readings. I was afraid that what I was about to say could come off as offending to some of my fellow classmates and, in defense to that, it would cause another debate. However, after having the opportunity to listen to the first debater give their opinion on the question, I felt more comfortable to speak my opinion without the risk of...

Words: 827 - Pages: 4