In: Business and Management

Submitted By ttwhalen
Words 370
Pages 2
The Kittyhawk team developed a 1.3 inch disk drive: a disruptive technology in every sense. From a project management point of view, HP did everything right. They had set up an autonomous project team, and gave the project heavy senior management support. The team focused on the emerging personal digital assistant (PDA) market, which in the early 1990’s was believed to have explosive growth potential. As a consequence the team created a product that had incredible shock resistance and low power consumption, and weighed less than an ounce. In terms of field failure it was the most reliable product ever introduced in the disk drive industry.
HP created a remarkable new technology, but its targeted market never blossomed. Just at the end of the case as the clock was running out on the Kittyhawk team, Nintendo approached HP with its Nintendo 64 system with a slot for a 1.3” disk drive, and projections that it would sell several million units per day during the upcoming Christmas season. The problem was that they needed the drive for $49.95, and HP had designed the Kittyhawk for a different market at a cost of $250 per unit. The 1.3 drive was a potentially disruptive technology which could have been designed to a $49.95 price point, but HP had positioned it as a sustaining technology, as nearly as possible.
Whether a new technology is sustaining or disruptive is often a strategic variable rather than something inherent in the technology itself. HP took the market’s structure and the needs of the customers it had identified as givens, and attempted to push the technology far enough that it addressed those needs. A very different approach would have been to take the disruptive technology’s current capabilities as a given, and then find a market which valued the attributes of the technology which existed at that time. Research indicates that the overwhelming tendency of…...

Similar Documents


...revenues, DMD represented a decreasing percentage of HP sales (see linear trend line). [please note that DMD and corporate sales are scaled logarithmically , and the % DMD/Corporate is depicted on its own linear scale] [pic] Question 2. The Kittyhawk drive turned out to be a commercial failure. Never-the-less, HP did many things right in its planning and development. List and discuss what HP did right with Kittyhawk. HP did a number of things correctly in its planning and development of the Kittyhawk drive. First and foremost, the Kittyhawk project had the full support of its senior management. Bruce Spenner, the DMD executive initially driven to expand DMD’s market share, first sold the idea to Dick Hackborn, executive vice president of the entire Computer Products Organization. Hackborn agreed with the opportunity and chose one of the options Spenner presented. The case states that Hackborn had enough clout within HP for his approval to make “everyone…fall into line”. Even Lew Platt, HP’s CEO, frequently visited to check on progress which signaled to the Kittyhawk team, and the rest of HP, the special nature of this project. Next, HP set up an autonomous group to specifically focus on the Kittyhawk project. The project team was set up physically and financially separate from the rest of the company. This was done because most of the R&D managers balked at supporting the project, despite the endorsements from upper management. The group was given......

Words: 3424 - Pages: 14


...Prototyping Discussion: 1) Bank of America: Experimentation in Services 2) BMW: Experimentation Technologies/Prototyping Managing Development Processes Under Uncertainty Discussion: 1) The flying car (Vol De Nuit) 2) Medtronic the Cardiac Pacemaker Business Panos Kouvelis Emerson Distinguished Professor of Operations & Manufacturing Management SESSION 2 SESSION 3 Managing the Innovation Process DETAILED COURSE DESCRIPTION (cont’d.) SESSION 4 Selection & Management of Development Projects Discussion: 1) Project selection (American Switching Systems) 2) Aggregate project plans (Le Petit Chef) Managing Disruptive Innovation SESSION 5 Discussion: 1)Seagate – Quantum: Modeling Disruptive Innovation 2)HP: Flight of the Kittyhawk SESSION 6 Managing Disruptive Innovation (Continued) / COURSE WRAP UP Back Bay Battery Simulation Debriefing (played in the window December 1-6, debriefed on December 7) Panos Kouvelis Emerson Distinguished Professor of Operations & Manufacturing Management Managing the Innovation Process TEXTBOOKS --- recommended, not required 1. The Toyota Product Development System by James Morgan & Jeff Liker, Productivity Press 2006 (strongly recommended – optional) 2. The Innovator’s Prescription: A Disruptive Solution for Healthcare, by Clayton Christensen, J.H.Grossman, and J. Hwang, McGraw Hill, 2009 (strongly recommendedoptional) Managing the Innovation Process Panos Kouvelis Emerson Distinguished Professor of......

Words: 615 - Pages: 3

Software Engineer

...SELECTION. MEET AS A GROUP TO BRAINSTORM PROJECT IDEAS. 4. The Strategy Diamond September 8 (Wednesday) a. Assignment: Group project teams, issue, and firm due b. Reading: Hambrick & Fredrickson (2005), ‘Are you sure you have a strategy?’ Academy of Management Executive c. Web: 5. SWOT Analysis September 13 (Monday) a. Assignment: Case analysis b. Web: c. Case: Hewlett-Packard: The Flight of the Kittyhawk (A) [9-606-088] d. Focus Questions: 1. What are the strengths and weaknesses of the way that HP structured and supported the Kittyhawk team? 2. What do you think are the root causes of the failure of the Kittyhawk program? How could HP have avoided that failure? 3. How do established firms typically respond when confronted with new technologies? 4. Think of one firm that treated technological change as an opportunity and one firm that treated it as a threat. What might explain their different approaches? 6. Value Chain Analysis September 15 (Wednesday) a. Assignment: Section quiz #1 Case analysis b. Web: c. Case: Hitting the Wall: Nike and International Labor Practices [9-700-047] d.......

Words: 4693 - Pages: 19


...“Intro”, “Analysis” or “Recs”, mild, normative, bold, or humorous to best reflect your own writing style, to make things more personal, and also to signal your thinking to the reader. Breaking a paper into sections with section titles makes it easier to read and also focuses your message so that it will be most attractive, readable, and convincing. * Some examples of section titles I have seen range from simple descriptive headings like “Background”, “Intro – What This Case Is Really About”, “Analysis, “Recommendations”, to those that convey more to the reader such as: “Analysis Of What Went Wrong With The Marketing Research At HP And Why Did This Happen,” “Analysis Of The Conflicts Between HP’s Value Network And The Needs Of The Kittyhawk Project”, “A Conceptual Analysis Of The Target Choices Color Kinetics Is Facing“, “What Really Happened At Kodak? Why Did It Ignore Digital Photography?”, “Kodak Wasn’t Killed, It Killed Itself,” , “Analysis – Dropbox’s Startup And The Framework Of Lean Startups”, “Strategic Analysis Of Dropbox’s Current Competitive Situation”, “Analysis - This Management Team Has The Wrong Qualifications For The Type Of Innovation They Are Attempting,”, “Recommendations – What Should HP Have Done Differently For The HP Project”, “Recommendations – How Should Eli Lilly Organize Itself Better To Respond To Change And New Opportunities?”, “Recommendations – What Decisions And Budget Priorities Should Eli Lilly Make On Its Current Product And Service......

Words: 2172 - Pages: 9

Hp – Flight of the Kittyhawk

...launched a technical innovation, the Kittyhawk, the smallest hard drive in the world at the time. The Kittyhawk development project had leadership support, decentralized project structure, and the financial/technical backing on HP. Despite these strengths the Kittyhawk had marginal success in the market with sales below estimated targets. The challenges the Kittyhawk development team had to overcome included difficulty identifying the correct market and an ambitious project deadline. The accumulation of missed opportunities within the Kittyhawk development project led to a revolutionary product with a much higher price point than many customers were willing to pay. The key strengths in structure of the Kittyhawk development team can be traced to two major elements: senior leadership team support and financial/technical backing of HP in addition to a decentralized project structure. Two very senior and well-respected leaders within HP, Bruce Spenner and Dick Hackborn as well as the CEO, Lew Platt, supported the Kittyhawk project. Their support made Kittyhawk a priority and the project was therefore able to obtain valuable needed resources, including the most exceptional employees from the Disk Memory Division (DMD) as well as other divisions within HP. Throughout the entire development phase of the Kittyhawk project, its importance was reinforced with regular visits from Lew Platt. To complement senior leadership’s support the Kittyhawk project also......

Words: 1212 - Pages: 5

Professor Zhang

...OPRE  6379:  Team  Assignment     CASES CASE 1: Hewlett-Packard: The Flight of the Kittyhawk, Clayton M. Christensen, 9-697060, March 2003 CASE 2: Creating Project Plans to Focus Product Development, Steven C. Wheelwright and Kim B. Clark, Reprint number 92210, HBR March-April 1992 CASE 3: Innovation Versus Complexity: What is Too Much of a Good Thing, Mark Gottfredson and Keith Aspinall, Reprint R0511C, HBR November 2005 CASE 4: Microsoft Office 2000, Alan MacCormack and Kerry Harman, 9-600-097, June 2000. CASE 5: Product Development at Dell CorporationCorporation, Stefan Thomke and Vish Krishnan, 9-699-010, January 1999 Case Presentations Nov 3 – Nov 10 – Nov 17 Nov 24 Dec 1 – Case 1 Case 2 Case 3, Case 4 Fall Break Case 5 Case Assignment Team 1-Case 4 Team 2-Case 3 Team 3-Case 4 Team 4-Case 1 Team 5-Case 2 Team 6-Case 5 Team 7-Case 5 Team 8-Case 3 Team 9-Case 1 Team 10-Case 2 Team 11-Case 5 Each team to read all case studies and prepare a 25-30 minute class presentation on power point on ONLY the case study assigned to the team - addressing the questions listed below. You may turn in the ppt presentation with the speaker notes or a word document answering the questions. The questions are guidelines for the team to address in the presentation. Each team should have a few overview slides on the case to introduce the case to the class. All the students are expected to have read all the cases. All the ppt from the teams will be available to all the teams...

Words: 1013 - Pages: 5

20 Mckenna Transcripts in One Document

...impossible.I put this to the mushroom, and it said “well, time travel is possible, but you can only travel as far back in time as the moment of the invention of the first time machine”You can’t travel further back in time than that because there were no time machines before that. So it’s a kind of barrier.So then I thought….here was my model of what would happen when the lady temponaut sails off into the future.Lets forget about here and ask the question “What happens next in our world?”My first guess was, what happens next is thousands and thousands of time machines arrive from all points in the future.They have come back in time to witness the first time machine take off, it was as though you had a piper-cub that you could fly off to Kittyhawk North Carolina, that windy morning in late December when the brothers Wright rolled her out of her bicycle shop and fired her up.Then I said, but wait a minute, we haven’t dealt with the grandfather paradox. One of these time machines from the distant future on its way to the first time flight could stop off and kill the grandfather of the driver of that first time machine, and we haven’t gotten anywhere at all.So then, I produced a slightly more complicated model but it works so here’s what it is.It’s that because the future is not what we think it is, here’s a metaphor which makes it more clear.In this world that we’re living in right now we have people such as Bill Gates and his research and development teams.And we have people......

Words: 451474 - Pages: 1806

Hewlett Packard Kittyhawk Case Analysis

...1992, Hewlett-Packard introduced the Kittyhawk, which was the smallest hard disk drive in the world at the time at 1.3” in diameter. The initial product held 20 megabytes of storage and could withstand a three-foot drop without losing any data. For HP, the possibilities of such a product seemed endless. As a result, the company launched the project with a rather ambitious goal; that is; for the project to succeed, it would have to meet the following requirements, as specified by Bruce Spenner, HP’s Disk Memory Division (DMD) General Manager: it would have to be ready for market in 12-months, generate $100-million in revenue within 18-months after launch, and make the break-even point within 36-months. However, by June 1994, after only two years of effort, the project’s sales failed to meet the projected forecast and Rick Seymour, the project leader, was left having to make some big decisions. Why did Kittyhawk fail? By applying course concepts, some of the reasons become clear. The Disk Memory Division was essentially an OEM supplier in high-performance markets and had technical competencies in sustaining technology improvements in disk drives. Under Spenner’s leadership, the Division was to become a major player in the growing disk drive market. Spenner’s “big-business fast” strategy is ultimately what caused the project to fail. Since HP was a company that specialized in sustaining technological enhancements, it managed the Kittyhawk project as though it was a......

Words: 1421 - Pages: 6

Flight of the Kittyhawk

...Hewlett-Packard: The Flight of the Kittyhawk (A) Company Overview: Hewlett-Packard Corporation is a very prevalent brand name recognized globally. Headquartered in Palo Alto, California, the company is one of the world's largest information technology companies that specializes in developing and manufacturing computing, data storage, networking hardware, designing software and delivering services. Major product lines include personal computing devices, enterprise, industry standard servers, related storage devices, networking products, software, printers, and a diverse range of imaging products. With many divisions that specialize in certain manufacturing products, such as data storage or networking software development, Hewlett-Packard strives to produce quality products at an affordable price targeted for household consumers and other businesses. In June of 1992, Hewlett-Packard invested a portion of capital into developing the world’s smallest and quality hard disk drive at that time for other businesses to adopt. They desired to take advantage of the market’s first-mover position by introducing their infamous Kittyhawk drive. Rick Seymour, the Kittyhawk project leader, addressed goals and timelines for the implementation of the hard disk drive. Aiming to be a market mover, they only gave the Disk Memory Storage Division (DMD) a twelve month time to finalize the product. Rigid hard disk drives are basically “magnetic information storage and retrieval devices......

Words: 839 - Pages: 4

Supply Chain

...Things to be learned from kittyhawk From 1991-1995, the kittyhawk project has undergone a lot, including the optimistic plan at the initial stage, difficulties in developing and marketing, finally the close of the project. The project appeared to be very promising at that time, ending up with an unexpected failure. Though it was not a commercially successful project, the merits and faults lied in the case are very valuable. Talent Using the right talent for the right position is always critical in administration. Spenner, who was put in charge of that project, is a very aggressive and thoughtful person. The strategy he took, never take a fortified hill, helped this project keep itself away from bloody competition. He chose not to compete with existing companies, choose to be distinguished by making 1.3’’ storage. Besides, he was very good at executing the plan, managing his team and stimulating his team. He is a main reason the project was executed that beautifully. And that’s also a reason why all the team members missed the project so much even after the project was close. Cease the loss In a project which is an unsuccessful one, ceasing the loss on time is crucial for a company’s survival. HP did a good job of ceasing the loss. At the beginning, the storage was to be used by personal digital assistants, sub-notebook, printers, copiers, , it turned out to be used by word processors, digital cameras and cash registers, and the actual production was about one-sixth......

Words: 353 - Pages: 2

Hewlett Packard - Kittyhawk

...Hewlett Packard – Kittyhawk Project   Case Study Assignment #1  Read and write an analysis of Case II-9, “Hewlett-Packard: The Flight of the Kittyhawk” from the textbook. Select one partner to work with and prepare an analysis of the case. In your analysis, include answers to the following questions: a. What would you rate as the strengths and weaknesses of the way Hewlett Packard structured and supported the Kittyhawk development team? b. What do you think of the way the team set out to find a market for the Kittyhawk? c. What correct turns and what wrong turns did they make? d. What do you think are the root causes of the failure of the Kittyhawk program? e. Is there any way HP could have avoided its fate by addressing these root causes?   In June 1992, Hewlett-Packard (referred to HP hereafter) introduced smallest hard disk drive in the world named as the Kittyhawk. It was the first ever commercially produced hard drive in a 1.3 inch form factor. The idea was conceptualized in early 1991 by HP’s management when it was eagerly trying to explore strategies for transforming their Disk Memory Division (DMD) as a market leader. Kittyhawk project team was led by Rick Seymour under the supervision of Bruce Spenner. From the inception of Kittyhawk, Spenner had been keen that the new technologies that had an enormous potential to cause new-market disruptions. He intended to create a disk drive feasible with any product that had microprocessor. Kittyhawk......

Words: 1373 - Pages: 6

Innovator Dillema

...THE MARKET FOR THE HP 1.3-INCH KITTYHAWK DRIVE Differences in the forecastablity of sustaining versus disruptive technologies profoundly affected Hewlett-Packard’s efforts to forge a market for its revolutionary, disruptive 1.3-inch Kittyhawk disk drive.1 In 1991, Hewlett-Packard’s Disk Memory Division (DMD), based in Boise, Idaho, generated about $600 million in disk drive revenues for its $20 billion parent company. That year a group of DMD employees conceived of a tiny, 1.3-inch 20 MB drive, which they code-named Kittyhawk. This was indeed a radical program for HP: The smallest drive previously made by DMD had been 3.5inches, and DMD had been one of the last in the industry to introduce one. The 1.3-inch Kittyhawk represented a significant leapfrog for the company—and, most notably, was HP’s first attempt to lead in a disruptive technology. For the project to make sense in a large organization with ambitious growth plans, HP executives mandated that Kittyhawk’s revenues had to ramp to $150 million within three years. Fortunately for Kittyhawk’s proponents, however, a significant market for this tiny drive loomed on the horizon: handheld palm-top computers, or personal digital assistants (PDAs). Kittyhawk’s sponsors, after studying projections for this market, decided that they could scale the revenue ramp that had been set for them. They consulted a market research firm, which confirmed HP’s belief that the market for Kittyhawk would indeed be substantial. ...

Words: 82673 - Pages: 331

Hewlett Packard Kittyhawk Case Analysis

...Digital Distribution and the Music Industry in 2001: a Case Study of Napster By Julius Danjuma IS650: Telecommunications Management Summer 2012 Overview: Shawn Fanning created Napster in his dorm room at Northeastern. It was the fastest-growing application in the history of the Internet which changed the world but failed to achieve business success. Napster started out as a free download tool but the goal was to make it into a real business in partnership with the record labels. The goal at Napster was to be the online distribution channel for the record labels, much like iTunes for example. There were several offers made to the labels that would have given them the vast majority of all of the revenue. The numbers were staggering. There were over 50 million users, many of whom were willing to pay $5 per month or $1 per download for digital music. That translates to about $250M a month or $3B per year. Even if Napster kept just 10% of the revenue that would be $300M per year against expenses of less than $10M. At the stock market multiples of the day that would have been a $15B IPO. The economics of the record industry are puzzling and their accounting methods are very creative. At the time CD’s were sold for about $17 at retail. The retailer and distributor took more than half of the price as their mark-up. The manufacturing costs took another couple bucks. The promotional costs of advertising, music video, payola to radio stations, and other PR......

Words: 2678 - Pages: 11