Hank Colb Case (Quality Control)

In: Business and Management

Submitted By eholmen
Words 2099
Pages 9
Hank Kolb Case:
Quality Control

Product & Operations Management (346), Section 2, December 1, 2010
Professor: Bud Roychoudhury

INDEX:

* Introduction………………………………………………………………………………………………….….. Page 2 * Definition of Problem……………………………………………………………………………………….. Page 2 * SWOT analysis…………………………………………………………………………………… Page 2-6 * Root Problem………………………………………………………………………………………… Page 6 * Alternative solutions …………………………………………………………………………………….. Page 6-8 * Solution Suggestion………………………………………………………………………………………….. Page 8 * Conclusion………………………………………………………………………………………………………… Page 9

INTRODUCTION

When analyzing this case, it is obvious that this company has some areas they could improve upon. We plan to provide a solution to these various problems through extensive definition of the problem, thorough SWOT analysis, and suggestion of various solutions and alternatives that are best fit to improve the quality inside this business. Each section is filled with our detailed observations, all coming together in the end with one goal in mind: making your business better.
PROBLEM DEFINITION

SWOT Analysis

The SWOT analysis begins by looking inside your business for both the apparent and hidden strengths and weaknesses of your operation. A company’s strengths should be realistic and not modest. The first apparent strength is the experience that Hank Kolb has gained through the attendance of the seminar on quality. He now has the knowledge that something is going wrong and can start taking the actions to correct it. His experience will provide insights regarding how to go about different issues involved in running the business. Also, with solving these problems he will have gained the communication skills and the valuable dedication of the…...

Similar Documents

Hank Colb

...Case Study of the Causes of Problems in the Greasex Line of a Company and the Possible Quality Improvement Steps   In the high-technology sector, the Greasex line is specialized in manufacturing solvents packed in cans for degreasing. Nonetheless, the company had experienced some trouble with the new filling equipment. The main problem was the presence of high-pressure beyond the required upper specified limit in some second shift cans. However, these problems as identified from the case study are related to several areas. They include personnel such as the newly assigned operator from a different department. He lacked formal training and was also negligent as he was absent from his position of operation during the process. Moreover, Mac Evans; the line supervisor, after picking and tagging the cases as “hold”, went on his duties and did not supervise their progress. Although vetted by hand by Wayne Simmons, the first-line supervisor, they could still be of low quality and pose safety threats to the customers. In addition, the machinery used was not initially designed to handle the process involving lower viscosity of Greasex, lacked preventive maintenance schedule. The appropriate equipment, which is the special filling head for the process, had been poorly and haphazardly adjusted. Materials used in production such as plastic nozzle can heads were designed on a rush order by a vendor and, therefore, had slight burrs on the inside rims causing fitting problems. They had......

Words: 940 - Pages: 4

Hank Quality Klob

...Buy A Quality System for Hank Kolb essay paper online A quality system is necessary for any company to survive in the market; the company has to ensure that it has means and resources of getting a desirable end product. in all the companies these is usually a flow process from one level to the other, the failure of one of these processes result in bad end product. The function of managers especially in factories is to assure the consumers of quality control and assurances. When the manager fails to do this the factory is expected to have a short market span, several procedures have been designed to address or assist the managers in ensuring that quality of the products is maintained at an acceptable standard. In this case Hank Kolb should realise the problems facing the company cannot be solved overnight and he must design a long term project to oversee the overturn of production misfortune. First he must come up with definition of the key problems Defining the situation This time Hank should clearly understand the problems facing the company of which its end result has led to production of low standard products. During this period he should he should take into account what the customer expects from and pinpoint the cause of their underperformance. When these have been accomplished he must set achievable goals for the future of the company, the goals should be within a timeline and budgetary capability of the company. Once he has everything in place then allocation......

Words: 1322 - Pages: 6

Hank Kolb, Director Quality Assurance

...Hank Kolb, Director, Quality Assurance Problem Definition The fundamental problem is management. Senior management lacks the policies and visible support of a quality philosophy such as following a ISO 9000 Quality System. Even though they have recently appointed Hank Kolb to oversee their quality program, which is a move in the right direction, there is still a lack of visible senior management support for quality. The fundamental problem shows up in a number of symptoms such as putting schedule and market share above quality and safety. It also shows up as a poor attitude about quality. Quality is viewed as an add on, inspected in, and is an impedance to doing their job. Proper training is not viewed as a prerequisite to start a job which leads to unqualified people performing processes.   This fundamental problem also creates an entire host of other problems. These problems, as stated in the case study, include: lack of purchasing, design, and testing processes, inspections that are after the fact with out in-process controls or feed back loops. It also leads to a lack of product tractability, quality maintenance records of the equipment so improvement or stabilization data is not available. Designs are made on hunches - there is no decisions based on facts and data.   Statements like “even if it is a little off spec was tolerable, we need market share now” shows a poor quality attitude and the schedule is more important.   The inspector had used only a......

Words: 1880 - Pages: 8

Hank Kolb, Director, Quality Assurance

...Hank Kolb, Director, Quality Assurance case study examines a manufacturing industrial plant that employs 1,200 people. Hank Kolb was the newly hired director, quality assurance. Kolb was warned by the general manager, Morganthal, about the “lack of a quality attitude” in the plant, and told Kolb that he “should try and do something about this.” Hank Kolb left a very good job to accept this position because he wanted a challenge and thought this company was serious about the importance of quality (Leonard, 1993). Before examining the quality (or lack thereof) within the different layers of the manufacturing plant procedures I feel it would be beneficial to layout each employee and their main roles / steps in the communication and production process. The following is the list of employees discussed within the case study: • Hank Kolb: Director, Quality Assurance • Mark Hamler: Kolb’s immediate subordinate as the quality control manager (Hamler’s evaluation form stated “superb technical knowledge; managerial skills lacking.”) • Mac Evans: Inspector of the line for Greasex • Wayne Simmons: First-line supervisor • Morganthal: General Manager (Morganthal warned Kolb, “lack of a quality attitude” and told him “should try and do something about this.” He also expressed his concern for the plant, “We have to improve our quality, it’s costing us a lot of money, I’m sure of it, but I can’t prove it! Hank, you have my full support in this matter; you’re in charge of these......

Words: 2037 - Pages: 9

Hank Kolb Quality Assurance

...9-681-083 REV: FEBRUARY 5, 1993 Hank Kolb, Director, Quality Assurance Hank Kolb was whistling as he walked toward his office, still feeling a bit like a stranger since he had been hired four weeks before as director–quality assurance. All that week he had been away from the plant at a seminar given for quality managers of manufacturing plants by the corporate training department. He was now looking forward to digging into the quality problems at this industrial products plant employing 1,200 people. Kolb poked his head into Mark Hamler's office, his immediate subordinate as the quality control manager, and asked him how things had gone during the past week. Hamler's muted smile and an "Oh, fine," stopped Kolb in his tracks. He didn't know Hamler very well and was unsure about pursuing this reply any further. Kolb was still uncertain of how to start building a relationship with him since Hamler had been passed over for the promotion to Kolb's job—Hamler's evaluation form had stated "superb technical knowledge; managerial skills lacking." Kolb decided to inquire a little further and asked Hamler what had happened; he replied: "Oh, just another typical quality snafu. We had a little problem on the Greasex line last week [a specialized degreasing solvent packed in a spray can for the high technology sector]. A little high pressure was found in some cans on the second shift, but a supervisor vented them so that we could ship them out. We met our delivery schedule!" Since Kolb......

Words: 1747 - Pages: 7

Hank Kolb, Director of Quality Assurance

...Case Report Hank Kolb, Director of Quality Assurance Group 17 Navid Razavi Frederike Schmidt Introduction The Case “Hank Kolb, Director of Quality Assurance” is about a production line of an industrial product plant, called “Greasex”. The text deals with several manufacturing problems, within the production of spraying cans for the high-technology sector, of “Greasex”, which arise from the contradiction of interests between the quality and manufacturing department, due to time pressure in the production. First of all, the spray cans of “Greasex” have a quality issue. Due to the high pressure in the cans, there is an accidental risk for customers which could lead to a fatal image loss of the company. There are several causes mentioned by the director of quality assurance. The untrained operator for the filling equipment and the time pressure of the manufacturing personnel leads to mistakes and inaccuracies during the production. Furthermore, there is no regular maintenance of the filling equipment, which is also very old and not designed for the production line “Greasex”. This leads to high non-standard downtimes of the production process and causes the time pressure of the manufacturing personnel. Because of the time pressure coming from the production-planning department, there is an inadequate supply of nozzle heads, an important part of the cans. Due to the unbalanced amount of this parts, the company is giving rush orders to the suppliers, which ends in a......

Words: 728 - Pages: 3

Hank Kolb Case

...Problem Definition The fundamental problem is management. Senior management lacks the policies and visible support of a quality philosophy such as following a ISO 9000 Quality System. Even though they have recently appointed Hank Kolb to oversee their quality program, which is a move in the right direction, there is still a lack of visible senior management support for quality. The fundamental problem shows up in a number of symptoms such as putting schedule and market share above quality and safety. It also shows up as a poor attitude about quality. Quality is viewed as an add on, inspected in, and is an impedance to doing their job. Proper training is not viewed as a prerequisite to start a job which leads to unqualified people performing processes. This fundamental problem also creates an entire host of other problems. These problems, as stated in the case study, include: lack of purchasing, design, and testing processes, inspections that are after the fact with out in-process controls or feed back loops. It also leads to a lack of product tractability, quality maintenance records of the equipment so improvement or stabilization data is not available. Designs are made on hunches - there is no decisions based on facts and data. Problem Justification Personnel had stated that the operator had just be transferred in without any formal training and the on-the-job training was by an unqualified person shows proper training is not viewed as a......

Words: 638 - Pages: 3

Hank Kolb Case

...You are Hank Kolb and you realize that the quality problems with the Greasex line is a symptom of a larger quality management issue for the organization. You have formed a problem solving team within the organization to analyze this larger problem and make recommendations on how to improve the quality management system with in the organization. Describe how your team will analyze this problem and make recommendations for improvement. 1. Write a problem statement that identifies the improvement objectives. 2. Describe the data and information collection tools that you will use to analyze this problem. Be specific. For the data you will collect, design the data form(s) that will be used. You may also identify data that may be within the organization data bases that you will analyze. 3. Generate a data set (since you cannot actually collect the data) and show how you would use one or more analysis methods to analyze the data. 4. Establish design criteria that you will use to evaluate alternatives that your team may develop. 5. From the information in the case, as well as any other data/information that you have, make recommendations on how to improve the quality management system in the organization. Create an evaluation system that you will use to track the results of your team’s recommendations. Write a report summarizing your case analysis. The goal of this report is to demonstrate your ability to use the problem solving approach and tools taught in this......

Words: 258 - Pages: 2

Hank Kolb Case

...9-681-083 REV: FEBRUARY 5, 1993 Hank Kolb, Director, Quality Assurance Hank Kolb was whistling as he walked toward his office, still feeling a bit like a stranger since he had been hired four weeks before as director–quality assurance. All that week he had been away from the plant at a seminar given for quality managers of manufacturing plants by the corporate training department. He was now looking forward to digging into the quality problems at this industrial products plant employing 1,200 people. Kolb poked his head into Mark Hamler's office, his immediate subordinate as the quality control manager, and asked him how things had gone during the past week. Hamler's muted smile and an "Oh, fine," stopped Kolb in his tracks. He didn't know Hamler very well and was unsure about pursuing this reply any further. Kolb was still uncertain of how to start building a relationship with him since Hamler had been passed over for the promotion to Kolb's job—Hamler's evaluation form had stated "superb technical knowledge; managerial skills lacking." Kolb decided to inquire a little further and asked Hamler what had happened; he replied: "Oh, just another typical quality snafu. We had a little problem on the Greasex line last week [a specialized degreasing solvent packed in a spray can for the high technology sector]. A little high pressure was found in some cans on the second shift, but a supervisor vented them so that we could ship them out. We met our delivery schedule!" Since......

Words: 1747 - Pages: 7

Hank Kolb Case

...Case Study Hank Kolb, Director, Quality Assurance Hank Kolb was whistling as he walked towards his office, still feeling a bit like a stranger since he had been hired four weeks ago as Director, Quality Assurance. All last week he had been away from the plant at an interesting seminar entitled “Quality in the 80’s” given for quality managers of manufacturing plants by the corporate training department. He was not looking forward to really digging into the quality problems at this industrial products plant employing 1200 people. Hank poked his head into Mark Hamler’s office, his immediate subordinate, the Quality Control Manager, and asked him how things had gone last week. Mark’s muted smile and an “Oh, fine,” stopped Hank in his tracks. He did not know Mark very well and was unsure about pursuing this reply any further. Hank was still uncertain about how to start building his relationship with him since Mark had been passed over for the promotion to Hank’s job – Mark’s evaluation form had stated “superb technical knowledge; managerial skills lacking” Hank decided to inquire a little further and asked Mark what had happened. Mark replied : Oh, just another typical quality snafu. We had a little problem on the Greasex line last week (a specialized degreasing solvent packed in a spray can for the high technology sector) A little high pressure was found in some cans on the 2nd shift but a supervisor vented them so that we could ship them out. We met our delivery......

Words: 1611 - Pages: 7

Hank Kolb Case Study

...Hank Kolb, Director of Quality Assurance Case Study 1 Prepared By Akanksha Gupta Problem Definition The fundamental problem is management. Senior management lacks the policies and visible support of a quality philosophy such as following a ISO 9000 Quality System. Even though they have recently appointed Hank Kolb to oversee their quality program, which is a move in the right direction, there is still a lack of visible senior management support for quality. The fundamental problem shows up in a number of symptoms such as putting schedule and market share above quality and safety. It also shows up as a poor attitude about quality. Quality is viewed as an add on, inspected in, and is an impedance to doing their job. Proper training is not viewed as a prerequisite to start a job which leads to unqualified people performing processes. This fundamental problem also creates an entire host of other problems. These problems, as stated in the case study, include: lack of purchasing, design, and testing processes, inspections that are after the fact with out in-process controls or feed back loops. It also leads to a lack of product tractability, quality maintenance records of the equipment so improvement or stabilization data is not available. Designs are made on hunches - there is no decisions based on facts and data. Problem Justification Personnel had stated that the operator had just be transferred in without any formal training and the......

Words: 1259 - Pages: 6

Hank Kolb, Director of Quality Assurance

...Hank Kolb, Director of Quality Assurance Problem Definition The fundamental problem is management. Senior management lacks the policies and visible support of a quality philosophy such as following a ISO 9000 Quality System. Even though they have recently appointed Hank Kolb to oversee their quality program, which is a move in the right direction, there is still a lack of visible senior management support for quality. The fundamental problem shows up in a number of symptoms such as putting schedule and market share above quality and safety. It also shows up as a poor attitude about quality. Quality is viewed as an add on, inspected in, and is an impedance to doing their job. Proper training is not viewed as a prerequisite to start a job which leads to unqualified people performing processes. This fundamental problem also creates an entire host of other problems. These problems, as stated in the case study, include: lack of purchasing, design, and testing processes, inspections that are after the fact with out in-process controls or feed back loops. It also leads to a lack of product tractability, quality maintenance records of the equipment so improvement or stabilization data is not available. Designs are made on hunches - there is no decisions based on facts and data. Problem Justification Personnel had stated that the operator had just be transferred in without any formal training and the on-the-job training was by an unqualified...

Words: 1251 - Pages: 6

Hank Kolb Case Study

...Hank Kolb Case Operations Management Spring 2016 March 17, 2016 The Case “Hank Kolb, Director of Quality Assurance” is about a production line of an industrial product plant called “Greasex”. After becoming the director, quality assurance, Kolb finds out that the company lacks the commitment to achieve an excellent quality product. Every department had a different method to define quality in where they focus from the design of the materials to the product itself. Like a chain effect, each department has symptoms that affect the quality of the product that is being provided to their clients. One issue they have is not having a person who is control of product qualities. The management lacks policies and visible support for quality standards. There’s no one to manage that so of course employees wouldn’t think that quality control is an important factor. There is also no proper training for equipment’s to employees too. In the plant maintenance department there is an inadequate supply of spare parts and filling machine purchased for another product and adapted to. In the purchasing department, the plastic nozzle head for the Greasex can designed by a vendor are not made correctly to fit the product. The product design and packaging was designed without consideration of production process. An issue in the manufacturing production is employees thinking that beating production quota more important than the products. All these departments do have issues that affect one......

Words: 542 - Pages: 3

Hank Kolb Case

...Case Study of the Causes of Problems in the Greasex Line of a Company and the Possible Quality Improvement Steps In the high-technology sector, the Greasex line is specialized in manufacturing solvents packed in cans for degreasing. Nonetheless, the company had experienced some trouble with the new filling equipment. The main problem was the presence of high-pressure beyond the required upper specified limit in some second shift cans. However, these problems as identified from the case study are related to several areas. They include personnel such as the newly assigned operator from a different department. He lacked formal training and was also negligent as he was absent from his position of operation during the process. Moreover, Mac Evans; the line supervisor, after picking and tagging the cases as “hold”, went on his duties and did not supervise their progress. Although vetted by hand by Wayne Simmons, the first-line supervisor, they could still be of low quality and pose safety threats to the customers. In addition, the machinery used was not initially designed to handle the process involving lower viscosity of Greasex, lacked preventive maintenance schedule. The appropriate equipment, which is the special filling head for the process, had been poorly and haphazardly adjusted. Materials used in production such as plastic nozzle can heads were designed on a rush order by a vendor and, therefore, had slight burrs on the inside rims causing fitting problems. They had to......

Words: 940 - Pages: 4

Hank Kolb Case

...Hank Kolb Case What are the causes of the quality problems on the Greasex line? Display your answer on a fishbone diagram. What general steps should Hank follow in setting up a continuous improvement program for the company? What problems will he have to overcome to make it work? The first action I would suggest Hank Kolb to do is hold an entire company meeting, one meeting per shift, to clarify the current issue amongst all management and workers. I would like for everyone to be on the same page on the matter, so there won’t be any rumors or discrepancies. While having everyone from the company at a meeting area, we will do a PowerPoint presentation in regards to refreshing all employees the company’s policy, morals, motives, specifications, and goals. Highlight the issue of safety factors versus production time constraints. Yes, we do need to meet all deadlines and schedules; however, we will NOT put our customers in danger due to meeting schedules. I would schedule some cross training sessions for all employees from all departments, so everyone will be able to operate any type of machinery the company has in the process. Plus, we can rotate all the employees to prevent any injuries and boredom of their jobs, thus creating knowledgably employees on all equipment. I would sit down with all management and pressure them to preach general industry safety and specifications of the new line of merchandise. I would encourage all management take TQM classes for all......

Words: 567 - Pages: 3