Good Samaritan Act

In: Other Topics

Submitted By lanitascott
Words 348
Pages 2
Good Samaritan Act Colorado/Louisiana
LaNita D. Scott
Afternoon Class
February 28, 2013

Good Samaritan Act Colorado/Louisiana
The Good Samaritan Act is legal terms in which refers to individuals who in good faith, volunteer to help other individuals in need of medical attention. In return the person giving the help must be responsibly with the injured person life. Each state offer good Samaritans immunity for assisting. For those good Samaritans who negligent cause the injured person more injures they could be held liable for any civil damages. There are individuals in this world that try and help others every day. Then there are others who will not help due to the fact that they are afraid to get into trouble because of these laws.
There are several states that have adopted the Good Samaritan Act. Colorado and Louisiana are two that have established these laws within their state. In Louisiana, if an emergency medical technician give their service to help another individual out during an emergency situation and do not arrange for further medical treatment will be liable for any civil damage. Colorado also states, that if a licensed physician and surgeon renders help and it leads up to negligent on the patient, that individual rending the services will be held liable only if that patient is not obligated to be covered by him or her.
Louisiana holds everyone liable for their actions no matter what. Whereas, Colorado only hold the individual who is the Good Samaritan liable for civil damage if they fail to provide the person receiving the care further medical treatment. Now if a licensed physician or any other medical profession offer help in the state of Louisiana but holds a licenses in another state will not be charged under the Louisiana Medical Practice Act. In Colorado, an employer shall not be held liable for civil damages only if that employer render…...

Similar Documents

The Position of the Rescuer and Good Samaritan Liability in Irish Tort Law

...of its origins from the 2009 Law Reform Commission consultation paper which essentially outlined a framework for the drafting of legislation. Furthermore analysing case law and statue from our jurisdiction and abroad, which was applied in the only real substantive case in Ireland to date, O’Neill v Dunnes Stores Ltd To determine the position of the rescuer in Ireland several factors were considered by the LRC such as the moral versus legal question of a duty to intervene, how intervention affects society and with an increasing level of litigation in modern Ireland, how the courts should view subsequent cases for and against Good Samaritans and Voluntary organisations. LRC Consultation Paper The recognition and protection of persons providing voluntary assistance has been addressed by the LRC Consultation Paper on Civil Liability of Good Samaritans and Volunteers, which proposes the introduction of a statute restricting the liability of such persons who intervene as rescuers. The recommendations in the paper essentially aimed to clarify the confusing position of rescuers in Ireland through the implementation of statute. Section 5.01 of the recommendations states “The Commission recommends that there should be no reform of the law to impose a duty on citizens in general” Historically, common law countries have hesitated to a positive duty to intervene, McMahon and Binchy note that common law has been completely opposed to the imposition of affirmative duties, in......

Words: 2468 - Pages: 10

Sale of Goods Act

...There is a contract for the sale of goods ("Bombshell" hair dye) between Lulu and the hairdresser. (a) A sale of goods by description occurs where the buyer purchases goods on the basis of a description of the goods by the seller. The hair dye did correspond with the description, despite the fact that it did not work properly. Thus, there has been no breach of this implied condition. (b) Merchantable quality means that the goods must be saleable commercially under the description by which they were sold. In order for this condition to apply, the following criteria must be satisfied; * the sale must be by description * the seller must be a seller who deals in goods of that description The criteria are satisfied because the description was for "blonde hair dye" and a hairdresser deals in goods of that description. As the blonde hair dye did not dye Lulu's hair blonde, it breached the condition of merchantable quality. (c) Fitness for purpose the relevant criteria for this condition are; * the buyer must communicate to the seller the purpose for which the goods are required (unless the goods have only one purpose) * there must be reliance on the seller's skill or judgement * the goods must be of a kind that are in the course of......

Words: 272 - Pages: 2

Sale of Goods Act

...A) Evaluate the implied terms in the sale of goods Act (1979) and the supply of Goods and Services Act (1982) Implied terms is statutory legislation inserted into consumer contracts and provides basic provisions that are set forth to ensure that consumers are protected when purchasing goods or a service. These terms are not explicitly stated, meaning despite no mention of them still apply they. The Sale of goods act 1979 is a vital element in all consumer contracts, providing five crucial implied terms which are as followed; S12 Title. This gives the consumer the ability to become the legal owner and also the right to claim money back. The case of Rowland v Divall Stolen car highlights how this is applied to the law. It appears that this term is beneficial as it protects both parties throughout business transactions. However it may be suggested that S12 definition ‘enjoy quiet possession of goods’ is unclear as well as too vague allowing room to be exploited for fraudulent reasons. Section 13 Description is a breach warranty introduced by Sand Supply of GA 1994, its main purpose being to ensure that the description of a product accurately matches the actual item ultimately making the product is fit for purpose. This appears good as it protects innocent buyer//////////// This implied term distinguishes clearly between the buyer and seller providing understanding about the goods purchased by consumers’ as shown in the case of Harlingdon & Leinster Enterprises Ltd v......

Words: 306 - Pages: 2

Good Samaritan Law

...| Good Samaritan Law Definition - A Good Samaritan in legal terms refers to someone who renders aid in an emergency to an injured person on a voluntary basis. What Is The Good Samaritan Law The "Good Samaritan Law" is the legal term that refers to someone who renders aid in an emergency to an injured person on a voluntary basis. The Good Samaritan laws offers legal protection to the person that gives reasonable assistance to another person who is injured, ill, or otherwise incapacitated. They made this law to encourage people to offer assistance without the fear of being sued or prosecuted for unintentional injury or wrongful death (Good Samaritan law, 2009). Most overdoses occur in the presence of other people and take several hours to cause death. However, research finds that in up to half of cases, no one calls for help.  911 calls are also often delayed as witnesses try ineffective methods of reviving people such as slapping them or dousing them with cold water.  The most common reason given for not calling 911 or for delaying help seeking is fear of arrest and prosecution (Szalavitz, 2011). Who Does It Protected Most of the Good Samaritan laws are specifically made for the public and each law protects different individuals. A person will be protected under the Good Samaritan laws as long as he or she has good intentions to aid the victim to the best of his or her ability during a medical emergency.  Under some Good Samaritan Laws, as long as......

Words: 1755 - Pages: 8

Mitchell V Lovington Good Samaritan

...the Good Samaritan Center located in Lovington, New Mexico. While working at the Good Samaritan center, Mitchell was given additional duties of handing out medications. There started to be issues with Mitchell not following the dress code, singing and not wanting to hand out medications. Mrs. Mitchell (appellee) was terminated on June 4, 1974 from Lovington Good Samaritan Center, INC. for alleged misconduct. June 12, 1974 Mrs. Mitchell applied for unemployment compensation benefits and was denied her benefits. July 24 1974, Mrs. Mitchell applied for an appeal. The issue of this case is whether the petitioner’s actions constituted misconduct if so as to disqualify her from certain unemployment compensation benefits. Under s 59-9-5(b), N.M.S.A.1953 The term “misconduct” is not defined in unemployment law for New Mexico. New Mexico adopted Wisconsin's 259-60,296 N.W. 636, 640 (1941) term for “misconduct”. The final decision was to reinstate Mitchells Commission due to the fact that her conduct was never severe enough to utilize the “last straw” doctrine. Using the “last straw” method an employer can rely on the doctrine for terminating an employee, where the termination is justified by a series of incidents of poor performance, followed by a final incident showing a blatant disregard for the employer's interests. In this case the Source: Kaplan University PA205 Unit 3 assignment case Mitchell v. Lovington Good Samaritan center Inc.,1976 Mitchell v. Lovington Good......

Words: 264 - Pages: 2

The Usa Patriot Act--Good or Evil?

...THE USA PATRIOT ACT--GOOD OR EVIL? Abstract Terrorism has been around in one form or another since long before September 11th 2001. It is our extreme reaction to the real threat of a terrorist attack began 9/11/2001. Although the odds of dying from a terrorist attack in America are extremely remote, after the attacks of 9/11/2001 and the overwhelming show of concern by American citizens, Congress hastily put together a bill outlining the workings of the U.S. Patriot Act. The United States Patriot Act of 2001 was signed into law by President George W. Bush in 2001. President Barack Obama signed the Patriot Sunsets Extension Act of 2011, which created a 4 year extension of 3 key parts of the Patriot Act. Warrantless searches of business records, roving wiretaps, & conducting surveillance of individuals suspected of terrorist-related activities not linked to any specific organized terrorist groups. The Patriot Act dramatically reduced restrictions on law enforcement agencies' ability to search all records, documents, histories, etc., without the restraints of the normal operations of judicial law which most citizens assume will always protect them. The National and State Governments and their agencies work together to implement the Patriot Act with as minimal an “obvious” intrusion as possible into ours, the American citizens lives. It is obvious the security must be there, but with a minimal amount of perceived disruption to constitutionally given freedoms and rights.......

Words: 2455 - Pages: 10

Transfer of Rights Under the Sale of Goods Act

...Sale of Goods National Law School of India University Law of Contracts II Transfer of rights under the Sale of Goods Act Submitted by: Shivendu Pandey Id No.- 1928 Date of Submission: 13th April, 2011. Table of Contents Introduction 3 Transfer of rights under the Sale of Goods Acts 4 What is a Sale? 4 Essentials of a contract of sale 4 Definition of property 4 Transfer of property as between seller and buyer 5 Passing of Property or Transfer of Ownership 5 Property cannot pass until the goods are ascertainable 6 Distinction between transfer of property and delivery of goods 7 Property passes when intended to pass 8 Ascertained goods 10 Passing of property in specific goods 10 Ownership in unascertained goods 11 Transfer of Title by Person not the Owner 12 Doctrine of Nemo dot quod non habet 12 Exception to the General Rule 12 Conclusion 14 Introduction Mercantile laws are laws that govern trade and commerce. These laws essentially deal with the rights and obligations of the parties to a mercantile agreement. In India, there are various mercantile laws like the Contracts Act, the Partnership Act dealing with particular mercantile relations. The Sale of Goods Act is one such act which deals with the contract of sale. Originally, the law relating to sale of goods or movables was contained in chapter VII of the Indian Contract Act, 1872. The Indian Contracts Act embodied the simple and elementary rules relating to the sale of goods. It was...

Words: 335 - Pages: 2

Mitchell V. Lovington Good Samaritan Center Inc.

...Mitchell v. Lovington Good Samaritan Center Inc. Supreme Court of New Mexico 555 P.2D 696. FACTS Plaintiff-appallee represented by Gary J. Martone, J. Richard Baumgartner, and Joseph Goldberg, Albuquerque. Defendant-appellant represented by Heidel, Samberson, Gallini & Williams, Jerry L. Williams, Lonvington. This appeal comes from the Bernalillo County District Court where the court reversed a decision of the Unemployment Security Commission and awarded benefits to a discharged employee. The ruling of the court is being appealed by the defendant. ISSUE Whether Mrs. Mitchell’s actions constitute as misconduct thereby disqualifying her from receiving unemployment compensation benefits. RULE The New Mexico Supreme Court adopted the definition of misconduct from the Wisconsin Supreme Court in Boynton Cab Co. v. Neubeck, 237 Wis. 249, 259-60, 296 N.W. 636.640 (1941) … “misconduct” … is limited to conduct evincing such willful or wanton disregard of an employer’s interests as is found in deliberate violations or disregard of standards of behavior which the employer has the right to expect of his employee, or in carelessness or negligence of such degree or recurrence as to manifest equal culpability, wrongful intent or evil design or to show an intentional and substantial disregard of the employer’s interests or of the employee’s duties and obligations to his employer. On the other hand mere inefficiency, unsatisfactory conduct, failure in good performance as the......

Words: 378 - Pages: 2

Sale of Goods Act

...THE SALE OF GOODS ACT Contract of sale: A contract of sale of goods is a contract where by the seller transfers OR agrees to transfer the property in the goods to the buyer for a price. Such a sale may be absolute OR conditional. Where under a contract of sale the property in the goods is transferred from the seller to the buyer the contract is termed as sale. Where the transfer of property in the goods is to take place at a future date OR after certain conditions are fulfilled the contract is termed as an ‘agreement to sale’. An agreement to sale becomes a sale after the expiry of the time agreed upon OR after the condition is fulfilled. Essentials of a contract of sale:- 1) Parties: The buyer & the seller who must be competent to contract. 2) Goods: The contract must be in respect of the sale of goods. 3) Transfer of ownership: There must be a transfer of ownership from the seller to the buyer i.e. the buyer becomes the owner of the goods after sale. 4) Consideration: Consideration of a contract of sale is always in terms of money. 5) Form: For a contract of sale there is no particular form prescribed. It can be in writing OR oral. 6) A contract of sale may be absolute OR conditional. A contract of sale is of 2 types:- When it is absolute the ownership of the goods is transferred to the buyer. Such a contract is termed as a sale. When the contract is conditional the ownership of the goods is......

Words: 3479 - Pages: 14

(Case Brief Unit 3 Pa205) Mitchell vs. Lovington Good Samaritan Center, Inc., 555 P.2d 696 (N.M. 1976)

...MITCHELL VS. LOVINGTON GOOD SAMARITAN CENTER, INC., 555 P.2d 696 (N.M. 1976) FACTS: Zelma Mitchell, appellee was dismissed from her employment at Lovington Good Samaritan Center Inc., appellant in June 12, 1974. The alleged grounds for her dismissal from Lovington Good Samaritan Center, Inc. were misconduct. Mrs. Mitchell applied for unemployment compensation benefits and was denied unemployment compensation benefits by a deputy of the Unemployment Security Commission. Finding that Mrs. Mitchell’s acts constituted misconduct and disqualified Mrs. Mitchell from seven weeks of benefits based on § 59-9-6(b), N.M.S.A.1953. The On July 24, 1974, Mrs. Mitchell filed for an appeal and the Appeal Tribunal reversed the deputy’s decision. Mrs. Mitchell’s benefits were reinstated on August 28, 1974. On September 13, 1974, Lovington Samaritan Center, Inc. filed an appeal on the decision made by the Appeal Tribunal to the whole Commission to the District Court of Bernalillo County pursuant to § 59-9-6(b), N.M.S.A.1953. The Commission overruled the Appeal Tribunal and reinstated the seven-week disqualification period. Mrs. Mitchell applied for and was granted certiorari from the decision of the Commission to the District Court of Bernalillo pursuant of N.M. STAT ANN § 59-9-6. On January 16, 1976, the District Court reversed the Commission’s decision and ordered it to reinstate the benefits to Mrs. Mitchell, from the judgment of the District Court, the Center appeals. ISSUE: The......

Words: 1181 - Pages: 5

Day in the Life Healthcare 'Good Samaritan Case'

...ethics. Criminal law is a system of law concerned with the punishment of those who committed the crimes. I believe in the Good Samaritan Case it is both a criminal and civil case. The case is criminal and civil case. The case is criminal because Broitzman and Larson where both charged for the crimes they committed. This case is also a civil law case because being a nursing home the actions of the girls charged also effected the community in more than just a criminal way. The residents of the nursing home had family members in and they themselves where members of the community. 2.What intentional torts do you think the nursing aides committed? Please give a definition for each intentional tort that you choose with an explination of why you chose that tort. The intentional tort Assault and Battery is the only one that seems to apply. As defined Assault is the threaten of harm, while battery is the actual harm to a person. The girls Broitzman and Larson both got charged with criminal abuse charges. Abuse falls under Assault and Battery with the actual harm to a person. The girls both recieved multiple counts of Abuse due to it being towards more than one resident in the nursing home. 3. Who is ultimately responsible for the supervision of hte nursing aides in this case? Define and identify the doctrine which could be used to find them liable. The Good Samaritan Society is being held responsible in a docrtrine of respondant superior meaning let the master answer. The young......

Words: 629 - Pages: 3

Zelma M. Mitchell, Appellant, V. Lovington Good Samaritan Center, Inc.,

...Unit 3: Legal Analysis and Writing PA-205 Shannon R. Courson Kaplan University 11/28/15   ZELMA M. MITCHELL, Appellant, v. LOVINGTON GOOD SAMARITAN CENTER, INC., Appellee. No. 10847. SUPREME COURT OF NEW MEXICO 89 NM 575,555 P. 2d 696 (1976) October 27, 1976, Decided Attorney for the defendant-appellant: Heidel, Samberson, Gallini & Williams, Jerry L. Williams, Lovingto Attorney for the plaintiff-appellee: Gary J. Martone, J. Richard Baumgartner, Joseph Goldberg, Albuquerque Opinion by: Justice Sosa Facts: Lovington Good Samaritan Center, Inc. employed Zelma M. Mitchell on July 4, 1972 in the position of Nurse Aide. After one year of employment with no noted reprimands, additional duties as a relief medications nurse were assigned two days per week. The plaintiff came to work on April 2, 1974, during a Federal inspection, out of uniform. She refused to go home and change, after asked to do so. The following day, the plaintiff arrived at work out of uniform again. On this occasion, she did go home to change after asked to do so. According to Betty Clarke, R.N., on May 15, 1972, in addition to other days, the plaintiff was obstinate and sang while dispensing medications. Clarke reported this behavior to Charge Nurse Stroope. On May 24, 1974, the plaintiff refused to give out medications as instructed by Ms. Stroope. The plaintiff made insulting remarks about the Nurse Aide, Carol Scurlock and Ms. Stroope on that day. Between May 24, 1974 and June 4, 1974,......

Words: 650 - Pages: 3

Mitchell V. Lovington Good Samaritan

...Plaintiff (Mrs. Mitchell) was terminated from her job at Lovington good Samaritan Center, Inc., due to alleged misconduct. Plaintiff then filed for unemployment compensation benefits. Due to the finding from the deputy of the Unemployment Security Commission Mrs. Mitchell was denied benefits for seven weeks. Plaintiff appealed the decision and was granted her money. The Unemployment center appealed that ruling and the first ruling went back into effect. Mrs. Mitchell appealed that ruling applied for and was granted certiorari from the decision. The Plaintiff’s money was reinstated to her by the District Court. Mrs. Mitchell was terminated from her job on June 4, 1974. On April 2 and April 3, 1974, Plaintiff went to work out of uniform. The first day she was told to go home and change she refused to do so, however, on the second day she did as she was told. Then on May 15, 1974, the plaintiff was singing while working, it was reported as unethical and time- consuming. Another incident happened on May 24, 1974. Mrs. Mitchell was told to change from medications to the floor routine. She was told why she was being switched but she was not co-operative. From that day unit June 4, 1974 Mrs. Mitchell refused to do her job. On June 4, 1974 Mrs. Mitchell went to work on time, and started filling out her time card. She filled it out for the whole hour shift. When a supervisor asked her about it she told him she was planning on working all 8 hours. He said something else and she......

Words: 307 - Pages: 2

The Good Samaritan

...The Good Samaritan Sometimes in life you will meet someone who is in need of your help. In some cases you might not even know the person; you just happen to be the one in a million who is at the right place at the right time. Most likely you will try to figure out at once how you might possibly be able to help the person in need. Concerning the level of the needed help you will find the answer more or less simple, but nonetheless it is quite a decision to let someone into your life in order to help them. Your decision may be influenced by your principles, moral and conscience, and in some cases you know that whatever you decide to do the decision will probably affect somebody’s life for ages if not the rest of their life. Steward Dunlop’s short-story “The Good Samaritan” takes up the theme of being helpful to a person in need as the narrator finds herself in this particular kind of situation when she meets Laylor in a lavatory of the National Portrait Gallery. She is a Londoner. This being the first thing she tells about herself means that obviously it is a rather central part of her character. By stamping herself as a characteristic Londoner she implies that she is quite withdrawn from her surroundings: “I am not in the habit of making friends of strangers. I’m a Londoner. Not even little grey-haired old ladies passing comment on the weather can shame a response from me. I’m a Londoner – aloof sweats from my pores.” (p.1 l.l.1-3) She even repeats that she is a Londoner to......

Words: 1163 - Pages: 5

Sales of Goods Act

...| SALE OF GOODS ACT, 1930 | | | master of finance and control (Part 1) September 30, 2011 Submitted by: Nishtha Tewari-2506 Aditi Rao-2560 Jasmeet Kaur-2562 SALE OF GOODS ACT, 1930 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT We would like to extend our gratitude towards Dr. Nidhi Jain for her guidance and constant supervision as well as for providing necessary information regarding the project & also for her support in completing the project. SALE OF GOODS ACT, 1930 CONTENTS I. Contract of Sale of Goods II. Overview III. Characteristics of a Contract of Sale of Goods IV. Sale v/s Agreement to sell V. Sale v/s Hire Purchase VI. Sale v/s Contract for Work and Labor VII. Kinds of Goods VIII. Perishing of Goods IX. The Price X. Modes of Price fixing XI. Agreement to sell at Valuation XII. Earnest or Deposit XIII. Stipulations as to Time XIV. Document of Title of goods XV. Conditions and Warranties XVI. Misrepresentation and Stipulation XVII. Conditions v/s warranties XVIII. When condition can be treated as warranty XIX. Implied Conditions XX. Warranties XXI. Implied Warranties XXII. Doctrine of Caveat Emptor XXIII. Exceptions to Doctrine of Caveat Emptor HISTORY BEHIND THE ACT * Sale of Goods act is a very old mercantile law. The Contracts of Sale of Goods was initially covered in Indian Contract Act, 1872 (Chapter V11) * Since the Indian Contract Act itself was a......

Words: 8193 - Pages: 33