Democratic vs Non-Democratic Government

In: Social Issues

Submitted By mia1116
Words 513
Pages 3
Discuss the principal feature of democratic government and non-democratic government. Give an example of each.

The principal feature of democratic governments is that the power resides with the people. In a democratic system, governments are established and updated through free and fair electoral processes. Through these processes, the populace elects representatives from competing political parties. The chosen (elected) representatives govern on behalf of the people who elect them. Further, elected representatives, and in turn governments operate under the same rules of law.

One example of a democratic nation is Canada. In Canada, the country’s people are represented in the House of Commons by 308 members of parliament (MP). The MPs represent constituencies that are determined based on population density. This system is ideal because large cities, with large populations have many delegates that can represent the many different opinions of the populace. The united states have a similar system whereby the people are represented by elected congress members who act on their behalf in the US government assembly.

Although these are important elements in characterizing a democracy, they are obsolete without the active participation of the populace. The citizens of a democracy have an intrinsic responsibility to sustain the democracy. Firstly, people must actively participate in political affairs by staying well-informed about political issues, supporting a political party, and of course by attending elections. This participation ensures, at least in theory, that the elected assembly accurately represents the nation’s populace. Further, citizens also have the responsibility to assemble and advocate issues of importance to them in order to influence government actions.
Democratic systems are becoming more prevalent around the world.…...

Similar Documents

Democratic Peace Theory

...Democratic peace theory, in its wider interpretation, is the empirical observation that democracies rarely, if ever, fight one another and it is this empirical dyadic observation that that has been described as the “closest thing we have to empirical law” in international relations. [1] Although what is meant by democratic peace is contested, and indeed as its validity as this essay will explore, the theory has been previously under Woodrow Wilson and more currently the Presidencies of Bill Clinton and George W. Bush, a significant conceptual factor in the formation of American foreign policy.[2] Our aim is a democratic peace, a peace founded upon the dignity and rights of every man and woman. America acts in this course with friends and allies at our sides, yet we understand our special calling: this great republic will lead the cause of freedom. In light of this statement, ongoing U.S. policy and its likely persistence an examination and understanding of the democracy peace proposition is clearly with merit. This essay will look at the democratic peace proposition at a several levels of analysis: at the monadic level of interstate war on whether democracies generally are more peaceful and whether transitional democracies are more inclined to war; and at the intrastate level as to whether democracies experience more or less civil war. It will examine the validity of the proposition(s), reasons for is occurrence and postulate on what implication there may be......

Words: 5527 - Pages: 23

Democratic Parties

...The Democratic Party and America’s Issues We are now four months away from the Presidential Elections, and we must choose what is best for America. The current running candidates are Barack Obama with the Democratic Party, and John McCain with the Republican Party. Barack Obama is now representing the Nation’s Democrats; he recently said that he is trying to balance hard head with a big heart. (Election 2008 P.48). Obama has planed many solutions to our current issues, on the health care issue according to Democrats. Org we will join 36 industrialized nations in making sure everyone has health care, starting by fixing the prescription drug program and investing in stem cell and other medical research. America right now is at a very critical situation from whatever point we look at. We are struggling economically, which is making America suffer in many ways. We have millions of illegal immigrants who contribute so much to our nation, but yet they are in a dark shadow where we do not see a close light to this issue. The war, we’ve had so many innocent Americans fighting for our country and giving their lives I thing it’s unfair. One of our major issues is the illegal immigration, “the current system makes criminals out of some 12 million people who only want to work hard on whose efforts large parts of the economy now depend.” (Bush Baiting). We also have thousands of young people who need to go to school, because America’s youth is what going to make this country more......

Words: 2256 - Pages: 10

The Democratic Party

...Selena Briones 8 November 2012 Government The Democratic Party The Democratic Party is one of two major contemporary political parties in the United States along with the Republican Party. Since the 1930s, the party has promoted a social liberal and progressive platform, and its Congressional caucus is composed of progressives, liberals, centrists, and left-libertarians. The Democratic party believes, Rights of the Individual, Freedoms of the Individual, Responsibilities of the Individual, and Beliefs Concerning Societal Conditions and Governmental Responsibilities. The party has the lengthiest record of continuous operation in the United States and is among the oldest political parties in the world. The Democratic Party evolved from Anti-Federalist factions that opposed the fiscal policies of Alexander Hamilton in the early 1790s. Thomas Jefferson and James Madison organized these factions into the Democratic-Republican Party. The party favored states' rights and strict adherence to the Constitution; it opposed a national bank and wealthy, moneyed interests. The Democratic-Republican Party ascended to power in the election of 1800. Andrew Jackson is typically considered the first Democratic President of the United States. Current President of the United States Barack Obama is the 15th Democrat to hold that office. As of the 112th Congress following the 2010 elections, the Democratic Party currently holds a minority of seats in the House of Representatives and a...

Words: 498 - Pages: 2

Federalists vs. Democratic Republicans

...groups, the Federalists lead by Alexander Hamilton and the Democratic-Republicans led by Thomas Jefferson, which thought this could be achieved in very different ways. Thomas Jefferson and Alexander Hamilton were very different in their methods to try and develop America as a nation. The two were very much alike because they both were avid Americans, and wanted to see the nation succeed. Both men were very involved in the U.S. Government and tried to voice their opinions on the best method for success. Neither of them would give any ground on their ideas, which created great conflict in the first years of the U.S. Government. Alexander Hamilton was a member of the Federalist Party. He supported a larger central government where the states had less power than the Federal government. Hamilton believed that bigger central government would provide assistance to programs and business to help them succeed. “Not only the wealth but the independence and security of a country appear to be materially connected with the prosperity of manufacturers” (Document C).Hamilton thought that the U.S. should lean more towards a manufacturing economy opposed to an agricultural one. Along with that idea Hamilton thought that a Central Bank was best for the economy to maintain a national debt that would ensure credibility, and to establish taxes. Hamilton was also supportive of the wealthy aristocrats having more influence in government he believed that the common people were not......

Words: 906 - Pages: 4

‘Is There a Democratic Deficit at the Heart of the Eu?’

...‘Is there a democratic deficit at the heart of the EU?’ Plan: Intro: -What is a democratic deficit? The European Union (EU) is a unique economic and political union of 27 member states which are located primarily in Europe. The EU operates through a system of supranational independent institutions and intergovernmental negotiated decisions by the member states. Important institutions of the EU include the European Commission, the Council of the European Union, the European Council, the Court of Justice of the European Union, and the European Central Bank. The European Parliament is elected every five years by EU citizens. It is often implied that the EU has a withholds some elements of a democratic deficit. A democratic deficit can be described as when a democratic institution or organisation, is seen as not fulfilling its democratic foundations when the operations and practices of that organisation become potentially undemocratic. A good example of this in the UK would be the view that the House of Lords increases the UK Parliaments democratic deficit, as the peers that sit in the House of Lords are neither elected nor accountable. I shall depict in the following essay both the arguments that provide the basis for there being a democratic deficit within the EU, and those that suggest that the EU has become/is more democratic than made out to be. Main body: - Elite domination is often a widely discussed cause of the democratic deficit within the EU. Germany and......

Words: 1353 - Pages: 6

Democratic Deficit

...Britain has a ‘Democratic Deficit’, Discuss. To first answer this question, you must first define what a democratic deficit actually is. A democratic deficit is when it is believed that there is a lack of democratic accountability for the decisions made within a government for a specific country. To say we have a democratic deficit in the UK seems absurd to most people. Our head of Parliament is an elected body and so are the entire occupants of the House of Commons so how can we say that we have a democratic deficit? Well, the House of Lords is a completely unelected body of government which does take part in some of the decision making in the UK and all of our laws have to be signed off and agreed to by the Queen another unelected party which is a major part of our political system. We also have numerous elections over the course of a year such as the elections for local government which make changes in a local area rather than in an entire country. Similarly, we have the elections for the European Parliament which has the power to produce laws which affect the whole of Europe so even if a country doesn’t agree or like the law, it can be implemented anyway. So, as you can see, it is possible to argue that this country does in fact suffer from a democratic deficit. The House of Lords is one of the biggest things used when arguing that this country suffers from a democratic deficit. Most members of the House of Lords are chosen by the monarchy, normally through the advice of...

Words: 855 - Pages: 4

The Democratic Transition in Nigeria

...The Democratic Transition in Nigeria Challenges of Democratization The election of Olusegun Obasanjo to the presidency of Nigeria in 1999 effectively brought an end to 16 years of military rule. Obasanjo became only the third head of government to be elected by the people (not counting the election of 1993, won by Chief Moshood Abiola but later annulled). Nigerians greeted the transition from military to civilian rule with widespread jubilation as they looked forward to a new era of stability, peace, and prosperity. Nigerians had good reason to be optimistic about the future. After all, Obasanjo assumed the presidency with an avowed commitment to combating many of the ills that plagued the country. His pronouncements before and after his election suggested that he intended to follow through on this platform, bridging the cleavages between ethnic and religious groups, and guiding the country through the process of democratization. The general public's expectation was that the country's return to democratic governance would lead to the restoration of freedoms lost under the previous regimes. Nearly seven years later, it is worth examining Obasanjo's efforts to establish a new order. A reflection of sorts took place when 40 Nigerians and other experts on the country attended a conference at the Kennedy School at Harvard in December 2002. They expressed their profound distress at the parlous state of Nigeria's democracy. Conference participants identified and......

Words: 2898 - Pages: 12

Democratic Peace Theory

...Democratic Peace Theory Democratic Peace Theory, which is firstly originated by Immanuel Kant back in 18th century, is a theory in political science that prevents armed conflict among democracies. The Democratic Peace indicates that democratic states will not get into war with each other; they have a separate peace On the other hand, it is possible for these democratic states to go to war with authoritarian regimes or stateless people. Scholars and academicians believe that democracies find an alternative way to get into a war such as compromises and arbitrations. It has been examined that democratic states have not engaged in a war with one another. Inherently, the number of democratic states expected to rise in the upcoming years of 18th century. As there are more democratic states, as there will be less armed conflicts among each other, which is going to lead the world to a better international system. It has been observed that democracies do get into armed conflict however not with one another; they usually get into war with non-democratic states. It is a significant observation. Democratic Peace Theory is consisted from Immanuel Kant’s “Perpetual Peace”. Immanuel Kant claims that peace is a reasonable outcome of the interaction of states with a republican form of government. The main idea behind Immanuel Kant’s “Perpetual Peace” is that ‘Democracy’ must be spread and made a universal system, in order to create peace amongst the states. This idea of Democratic......

Words: 741 - Pages: 3

Democratic

...of conflict is to take breaks. Look for these cues as to judge when to ask people to take their heart rates; - Long eye closures or eyelid flutters as a possible sign that the person may be censoring - Increases in any of the Four Horesmen; criticism, defensiveness, contempt or stonewalling - Arms akimbo position (folded across chest) - Hips swiveled away from partner - No positive affect - Controlled facial expressions - Anger - Sadness or distress - Fear brow- brows go straight across - Auto-involvements (like playing with hair) or involvement with a prop (like tapping a pencil) or other “away” behaviours that say “I’m not here” - A movement from a chest to a head register in fundamental frequency; the voice gets higher - “Non-ah” speech disturbances like not finishing sentences, repetitions, slips of the tongue, omissions, suttering. “Ah” disturbances are people’s attempts to hold onto the floor. What is the nature of their conflict and its regulation? Observe the couple’s interaction when discussing a problem that can be solved and one that is a perpetual issue. Use these questionnaires; the Perpetual Issues Questionnaire, the Gottman Areas of Change Checklist and the Solvable Problems Checklist. Important to note that the seeming severity or triviality of the issue is not a useful guide to whether it is solvable or perpetual and gridlocked; people can reach gridlock on even the most seemingly trivial issue. In discussion of problems that can be......

Words: 12671 - Pages: 51

Democratics

...This should not be a problem. Instead, every time you have run out of ideas, go to this topic to distract the American public is easily distracted. Pro-life too. In other words, pro fetus. They care about the unborn or even became a human being fully identifiable. But once born, are send that child to war or kill him if they decide a crime worthy of death is committed. The really funny thing is that the Republicans were the liberals of the time when their party was founded. Now, they despise liberals. For other hand Democrats are very liberal and their ideology are pro-choice, anti-death penalty, pro-gun control, gay marriage and generally more inclined toward having the government solve many problems through social programs. Their idea is that citizens send part of their money to government, and government takes care of those who need it. These 2 parties are the end of the policy of the United States as a result they are very strict in their rules and beliefs that is why there are some politicians who are independent, which means that none of the sides is followed. They just follow their own beliefs and rules to fix or improve the problem facing society An independent politician is an individual that is not affiliated to any party. There are numerous reasons why some politics may stand as an independent. Independents has a central viewpoint between those of major political parties. Sometimes they hold a viewpoint more extreme than any major party, have an......

Words: 967 - Pages: 4

Democratic Learning

... Running head: Democratic Learning Democratic Learning [Your Name] [Institution’s Name] What teaching style will fit the best to produce better results in the classrooms has always been a matter of concern for the educators. Since years, it has been debated whether teachers should opt for instruction-based learning system or a democratic learning style should be followed. Various researches have been conducted to resolve this mystery. However, these researches have given different notions in this regard. This paper aims to highlight some key rational points of this debate of authoritative vs. democratic learning styles in classroom so as to come up with a better teaching philosophy for our next generations. A democratic learning system works in a way that it requires teachers to select some representatives from the class who possess the similar ideas as that to their teachers (for example, ideas of how to teach and what to teach); these agents might then discuss the topics, and vote on the thoughts they have clashes with. At last, the instructors are obliged to teach whatever they think about as the suitable substance and methodology for a particular course. Keeping the above mechanism of democratic learning style at front, it is frequently said that democratic learning system in the classrooms may work well for the majority; however, when it comes to the minority groups, it has certain limitations. Many researches have summarized that democratic learning in classrooms......

Words: 1142 - Pages: 5

Democratic

...Russell (1986) showed that the autocratic style of leadership is appropriate for workplaces such as jails, prisons, the military, and highly structured settings with routinized operations because, in these places, the lives of masses of people completely hinge on workers following very specific orders step by step. In addition, this leadership style is favorable for the completion of simple tasks. Meanwhile, West-Burnham (1997) stated that the democratic leadership style facilitates enhanced participation from subordinate employees in the organization's decision-making process. Even though the democratic leader has the final say, he / she gathers information, ideas and feedback from staff prior to finalizing the very decisions that will affect them. This is a highly effective style of leadership since employees are more likely to put forth outstanding effort when they feel valued. Workers feel valued when their input is an integral part of an organization's decision-making process. Murray and Main (2005) agreed that the democratic leadership thrives in healthcare settings due to the varied skill sets and educational backgrounds of employees. Conversely, this leadership style does have drawbacks. For instance, soliciting everyone's input is time-consuming. Moreover, the aggressive staff members always provide feedback while the timid employees may never get the chance to make suggestions or offer input. Then, the visionary style of leadership involves a charismatic......

Words: 2057 - Pages: 9

Democratic Theory

...Democratic Theory and Contemporary Governance The place of democracy as a system of governance in the modern world seems to be the only means of governance that appeals to all and sundry in both the advanced countries as well as the underdeveloped ones. This could be because of the room it gives for people’s participation in the restoration, operation and sustenance of government. According to Nnoli, 1986, the concept of democracy has become part of the propaganda arsenal in the contemporary world. This propaganda role of democracy rose because of the positive sentiments it invokes in all the people. It is particularly appearing to the oppressed people of the world especially in Africa and whose yearning for freedom, equality and justice are daily frustrated. In fact , the propaganda value of democracy is so high that practically , every regime in the world even the most brutal ,oppressive and unjust ,wishes to justify its actions on democratic ground. Under these circumstances, it becomes difficult to fully understand the meaning of the concept democracy. It is in this light that Heater (1964) regards democracy as a form of government , a way of life or an attitude of mind which is essentially a method or organizing society politically .And that there are five basic elements without which no community can call itself truly democratic namely :equality, sovereignty of the people , respect for human life, the rule of law and liberty of the individual....

Words: 349 - Pages: 2

Democratic

...What is 'Leadership' Leadership is the ability of a company's management to make sound decisions and inspire others to perform well Democratic leadership it is also known as participative leadership. In this process every member of an organization or association can take part to select their leader. This is the best process to select a leader. Democratic leadership: Often called participative leadership Democratic leaders make the final decisions, but they include team members in the decision-making process. They encourage creativity, and people are often highly engaged in projects and decisions. As a result, team members tend to have high job satisfaction and high productivity. This is not always an effective style to use, though, when you need to make a quick decision. When is it used? When situations change frequently, democratic leadership offers a great deal of flexibility to adapt to better ways of doing things. Democratic leadership style can bring the best out of an experienced and professional team. It capitalizes on their skills and talents by letting them share their views, rather than simply expecting them to conform. organization fits for Democratic Leadership: To sum it all up, a democratic leadership style has its advantages and drawbacks. It is quite effective for manufacturing industries, professional organizations, non-profit companies and creative fields such as advertising where everyone’s opinion can make a difference while in organizations......

Words: 2195 - Pages: 9

Democratic Policing

...Democratic Policing S N Md Nazrul Islam Policing is surrounded by many myths and stereotypes but one of the most common ideas may be reflected in a thin blue line, “FIGHTING A WAR OF CRIME”, though it is not an accurate description of what the police do. Only a portion of police officers are devoted in crime fighting. Many police officers rarely make a felony arrest and almost never fire a weapon in their entire career. In reality Police play an extremely complex role in today’s society as because of their necessity and availability in 7/24 hours. People can reach them over telephone easily to inform the unwanted situation though it can be manned in other ways. As for example, if someone found a Lunatic in the street they prefer to inform police rather than to Social Welfare Department. In this scenario it is very difficult to sum up the roles and responsibilities of police, even though if we go through various acts, laws, rules and order like The Constitution of Bangladesh, The Police Act 1861, Police Regulation of Bengal 1943 and other major & minor acts, then we might be able to find some core functions are as follows: 1. Protect constitutional guarantees that’s are given to the citizenry 2. Create and maintain a sense of security in the community 3. Promote and Preserve Law & Order situation 4. Identify criminal offenders and criminal activity and when appropriate, apprehend offenders and participate in subsequent court proceedings. 5....

Words: 1152 - Pages: 5