Bob Knowlton

In: Other Topics

Submitted By Rojojel
Words 3277
Pages 14
1. IDENTIFICAR CONDUCTAS
Bob Knowlton fue designado como jefe de proyecto del laboratorio de fotones de Simmons Laboratories, hace dos años. Le agradaba quedarse después de la jornada de trabajo en su oficina, para leer y meditar.
Un día, que se encontraba descansando en su escritorio, entro un joven desconocido, presentándose como Simon Fester, el no era ningún cliente, y dijo ya haber comentado acerca del trabajo de Knowlton junto con Jerrold, su jefe. Knowlton enseño los resultados preliminares de una prueba que estaban realizando, pero Fester se quedo concentrado en las graficas, y respondía que dichos gráficos se parecían a una superficie de Jennings, lo que Knowlton asintió con la cabeza, aunque no tuvo idea de lo que hablaba. Knowlton se sintió molesto con el comentario de Fester, le dijo que irían a ver el experimento, ofuscado guardo las graficas en su cajón, y salieron de la oficina.
Al día siguiente Knowlton se dirigió a la oficina de Jerrold, y le comento que quería hablar sobre Fester, a lo que su jefe le pregunto que es lo que pensaba de él, Knowlton respondió que lo consideraba una persona lista y competente. Jerrold conto que lo habían contratado, que tenía muy buenos antecedentes, y que podría pasar algún tiempo con Knowlton, aunque este asintió y con gusto acepto, no quería que lo coloquen en su espacio, por lo que se le considera una persona poco asertiva, ya que no da a conocer sus sentimiento y pensamientos sinceramente.
Knowlton regresó al laboratorio con sentimientos encontrados, sabía que Fester produciría positivamente. Al día siguiente Fester se presentó con Knowlton, y este le dijo que iban a trabajar juntos durante algún tiempo, fue presentado al resto del grupo, con el matemático congeniaron inmediatamente.
Al término de la jornada laboral Knowlton esperaba que todos se retiren para poder relajarse y pensar las cosas, todos…...

Similar Documents

The Bob Knowlton Case

...BOB KNOWLTON CASE MBA 633: Case #2 Bellevue University December 18, 2012 DESCRIPTION This case centers on Bob Knowlton, a newly appointed project head who was promoted through a former project leader, Dr. Jerrold. Everything was going well for Knowlton until a new and brilliant addition was added to the team, Simon Fester. DIAGNOSIS The cause of the problem in this case is Knowlton’s passive characteristics. As project leader, Knowlton sees that there is tension building within the group as a result of Fester’s determination. Throughout the case we are confronted with many instances where Fester’s initiative to achieve results causes Knowlton to feel threatened and aggravated. Instead of acting as a leader and confronting the distracting nature of Fester’s behavior, Knowlton simply nods his head and agrees with everything that transpires. Fester is simply continuing his prevalent path because he feels that he is contributing progress to the project. This entire scenario could be remedied if Knowlton were to step up to the plate and act in a fashion that is consistent with his job title, leader. No one is going to hold Knowlton’s hand and correct the Fester dilemma, because it is Knowlton’s job to administer action. THEORY When provided the opportunity to confront Fester’s theories and group cooperation, Knowlton became a victim to his own passive behavior. Instead of taking charge and correcting the discrepancy of Fester’s action towards the team and......

Words: 530 - Pages: 3

Bob Knowlton

...Presentation 2: Bob Knowlton Case Study Characteristics Bob Knowlton; - low self-esteem - insincere - untruthful - good leadership skill Simon Fester; - insensitive - straight forward - individualistic - intelligent Doctor Jerrold; - not an observer - ignorant Questions 1) Discuss the reasons why what happened happened. Low self-esteem; - Basically, what happened in this case is that Bob Knowlton resigned because he felt threatened by his own colleague which is Simon Fester. He felt that he can't perform his work good just because he feels that Fester is a bit more faster in getting the work done, spot some flaws and grabbing opportunities. Knowlton also tend to easily get annoyed whenever his boss, Jerrold, praises Fester on his work. The problem with Knowlton is that he has a very low self-esteem. He doubted his own abilities as a leader of a small group in that particular organization. It seems like he is the kind of person who would prefer if the boss praises him or as a group, since he is the leader. So that he'll be more motivated and enthusiastic in doing his job. I see that he is at the level where esteem and prestige is in need for him at that moment. Insensitive; - As we all know, Simon Fester is the "new guy" in that organization. There are a lot of times that we saw Bob Knowlton felt uncomfortable whenever he is around Fester. Simply because Knowlton knows the capabilities that fester can do, but of course he has his...

Words: 825 - Pages: 4

Bob Knowlton Case Study

...Running Head: Bob Knowlton Case Study Bob Knowlton Case Study Introduction The Bob Knowlton case highlights various challenges faced by contemporary organizations, indicating the need for organizations to adopt appropriate strategies that would create favorable work environments and promote harmonious relations among the workforce. The management level of any organization plays a leading role in ensuring that organizations operate effectively. Strong leadership skills are essential in boosting the performance of employees without creating negative feelings among them. On the other hand, weak leadership is likely to create undesired outcomes in the workplace. Such developments may lead to increased burnout and dissatisfaction, which reduce employees’ morale. As a result, such organizations are likely to report increased turnover rates and high costs involved in hiring and training new employees. In the Bob Knowlton case, various issues are evidently undermining the performance of the organization. Acting as Jerrold, I would seek to address and control such issues in order to achieve optimal output from the Photon Lab. This paper examines the various issues presented in the case and recommends interventions to rectify the situation. Findings of Fact Faulted due process The introduction of a newcomer in the Photon Lab was the main reason that led to the exit of Knowlton. When introducing a new employee, it is essential to ensure that such individual is......

Words: 2102 - Pages: 9

Bob Knowlton

...Bob Knowlton A Case Analysis INTRODUCTION The Case revolves around the professional lives of the three main employees of Simmons Laboratories. The so-called protagonist is a person by the name of Bob Knowlton, who is the lead on one of the projects at Simmons Labs. Bob reports to Dr Katherine, another important part of Simmons Labs. The third important person in this case is Elliot Haywood. He is a new recruit into Simmons Labs and at the outset, expresses interest in joining Bob’s team. Bob Knowlton: Bob is someone who has been with the Simmons Labs for about nine years when the case is prepared. He is shown to be someone who thinks like old school scientists who believe in the trial and error method. He tests rigorously before coming to any conclusions and is meticulous about the details. He does not hesitate spending time and poring over any analysis or decision. At the same time, even after being a nine year veteran, he still seems like someone who is still finding his foothold in the firm. However, he is not very open about his inner feelings and internally hurts. Elliot Haywood: Elliot comes across as a “Type A” personality. He was always in an urgent need to complete his work and did not care if in this process he was disturbing or annoying others. In the case it is mentioned how Elliot called Bob at 2 in the morning to explain a new approach to certain lab problems without apologizing to Bob once for......

Words: 1310 - Pages: 6

Bob Knowlton

...Bob Knowlton Bob Knowlton A Case Analysis INTRODUCTION The Case revolves around the professional lives of the three main employees of Simmons Laboratories. The so-called protagonist is a person by the name of Bob Knowlton, who is the lead on one of the projects at Simmons Labs. Bob reports to Dr Katherine, another important part of Simmons Labs. The third important person in this case is Elliot Haywood. He is a new recruit into Simmons Labs and at the outset, expresses interest in joining Bob’s team. Bob Knowlton: Bob is someone who has been with the Simmons Labs for about nine years when the case is prepared. He is shown to be someone who thinks like old school scientists who believe in the trial and error method. He tests rigorously before coming to any conclusions and is meticulous about the details. He does not hesitate spending time and poring over any analysis or decision. At the same time, even after being a nine year veteran, he still seems like someone who is still finding his foothold in the firm. However, he is not very open about his inner feelings and internally hurts. Elliot Haywood: Elliot comes across as a “Type A” personality. He was always in an urgent need to complete his work and did not care if in this process he was disturbing or annoying others. In the case it is mentioned how Elliot called Bob at 2 in the morning to explain a new approach to certain lab problems without apologizing to Bob once for disturbing his sleep. Elliot was very......

Words: 338 - Pages: 2

Bob Knowlton

...huge gains in the second quarter.”—Bijan Moazami, analyst, Friedman, Billings, Ramsey (May 9, 2008)  Status: AIG lost $5 billion that quarter, $25 billion the next, and $62 billion the quarter after that, before being given a $90 billion credit by the U.S. government in 2008–2009. • Prediction: “Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae are fundamentally sound . . . in good shape moving forward.”— Barnie Frank, House Financial Services Chairman (July 14, 2008)  Status: By August 2008, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac were downgraded to the lowest credit ratings; on September 7, 2008, they were placed in conservatorship in “one of the most sweeping government interventions in private financial markets” in history.  • Prediction: “I think Bob Steel’s the one guy I trust to turn this bank around, which is why I’ve told you . . . buy Wachovia.”—Jim Cramer, CNBC (September 15, 2008)  Status: Wachovia shares lost half their value from September 15 to December 29, and Wachovia was taken over by Wells Fargo. • Prediction: “I think you’ll see $150 a barrel [oil] by the end of the year.”—T. Boone Pickens, investor (June 20, 2008)  Status: By December of 2008, oil was trading at $40 per barrel. • Prediction: “In today’s regulatory environment, it’s virtually impossible to violate rules . . . your money is safe with me.”—Bernie Madoff (October 20, 2007)  Status: In 2009 Judge Denny Chin handed Madoff a 150-year sentence for his “extraordinarily evil”......

Words: 6926 - Pages: 28

Bob Knowlton

...between Knowlton and Fester in their team. Bob Knowlton is a photon unit project head in charge of team. However, one day Bob felt that his leadership was at stake because a new brilliant scientist, Fester, was hired into the Simmons Laboratories and placed in Bob Knowlton’s work group. Fester demonstrated that his skills as a photon manager were, perhaps better than Bob’s. Jerrold, Bob and Fester’s boss, was extremely impressed with Fester and also was expressing that openly with the team. This made Bob feel intimidated that Fester was very sharp and competent and had solved some old problems, which were considered unsolvable by his team. He felt that Fester was slowly taking over leadership informal control of the team. As a result of this Bob may have lost some self-esteem and the respect of his team members. Bob Knowlton’s problem was that he was unable to discuss his opinions, feelings and conflicts with his boss Jerrold and teammates. Although Jerrold and Bob shared an open relationship, Bob did not indicate to Jerrold that he was having a problem and felt threatened by Fester’s brilliance and challenge to his leadership. Because of this Jerrold did not have a clue what was going on in Bob’s mind. Bob did not respond in the manner in which the leader of the team should have done. This demonstrated Bob’s inability to exercise authority and control when parity in team is disturbed. As a result his self-confidence in his capabilities reduced. Instead, Bob......

Words: 339 - Pages: 2

Bob Knowlton

...Case Analysis of Bob Knowlton By: Supriya Giri March 30, 2015 The case ‘Bob Knowlton’ revolves around a newly appointed project head for the photon unit, Bob Knowlton. Knowlton is very happy with the way things are going in his unit and his team up until a new comer Simon Fester enters the story who seems to be confident, brilliant and aggressive with his work approach. Knowlton reports to Dr. Jerrold who is the Director of research. The first thing that went wrong in this scenario was the way Fester was introduced to Knowlton. Dr. Jerrold failed to properly introduce the two gentlemen. Knowlton had no clue regarding what this new guy was doing in his group who seems to be challenging the thinking pattern of his team and Fester seems to be all over the place looking into things. This behavior of Fester alarmed Knowlton and threatened him and made him feel insecure. Simon was a guy who made an impression of “the genius guys” who was too confident and did not fear to challenge the traditional way of team work. At the end Knowlton resigns from his post in an unprofessional manner and joins a new company. While Fester was busy pinpointing the things that could be improved for better results, Knowlton’s insecurities kept on increasing day by day. Knowlton was not confident enough to voice his opinion and concerns to Dr. Jerrold. He kept on building his own story in his mind that Fester might be a probable candidate to replace him in near future. The way Fester interfered in...

Words: 647 - Pages: 3

Bob Knowlton Case Study

...The Bob Knowlton Case Study The problem Bob Knowlton quit his job suddenly and found a better position with more salary. But, Jerrold and Fester felt shocked on Knowlton’s decision. No one knew that why Knowlton wanted to leave. • Bob Knowlton was an introvert. He did not discuss his opinions/feelings/conflicts with his teammates. • He could not become an effective leader. He could not exercise authority and control when the unity in the team was disturbed. As a result, his self-confidence in his capabilities reduced. • He lacked communication skills. He should have communicated his roles and responsibilities. • The was an alliance between Jerrold and Fester – negative impact a. This lead to the resignation of Bob Knowlton – felt threatened by Fester. b. Bob taught that Jarrod has placed in him in his department to see Bob fail in his position. c. The alliance was not only work related but personal as well. d. The alliance between Jerrold and Fester grew stronger as the problem grew bigger. • The was an alliance between Jerrold and Fester – Positive impact a. By Jerrold placing Fester in the lab his intensions was good and to see the lab grow. b. Jerrold knew that Fraser was and expert and will boost the department. c. Fester was there to perform and not to play the political game and his intensions was not to make Bob feel bad but to do his work to the best of his ability. d. Fester impressed many people both internally and externally. Mistakes by......

Words: 598 - Pages: 3

Bob Knowlton Case

...Bob Knowlton Case: 1. Diagnose and evaluate the entire problem situation. List the problems. 2. If you were in Dr. Jerrold’s position:  what can you learn from the mistakes that have been made  how would you go about creating the learning organisation? Devise a strategy. Summary:  Some might feel Bob Knowlton acted irrational without voicing his feelings to Dr Jerrold.  Some might feel that his EQ, is weak, in terms of Fester, making him feel inferior, doubt his capabilities and also allowing Fester to take over as leader in the meetings.  Dr Jerrold lacked open communication and transparency therefore as a result; he lost a good employee, Bob Knowlton.  Bob is a team player and believes in using each other as resources through collaboration. “Bob Knowlton calls a meeting, however Fester, voices his opinion that he is not at all averse to meetings…”  Fester is not a team player, and one can assume he likes the credit and wants to be centre of attention.  Fester was very sharp and competent and had solved some old problems. He felt that Fester was slowly taking over leadership.  Very confident about himself and his ideas. Aggressive in his approach to solve a problem and well as put forth his ideas Problems:  Organisational culture seems work orientated with little focus of interpersonal relationships and communication. No feelings are discussed openly, therefore the assumption that the team is functioning well is false.  Unable to discuss his......

Words: 469 - Pages: 2

Bob Knowlton Case

...BOB KNOWLTON LAS EMOCIONES - GESTION DE LAS EMOCIONES 1) CUALES SON LOS OBJETIVOS DE LA ORGANIZACION: Un grupo de científicos de LABORATORIOS SIMMONS, Los cuales deben desarrollar la idea del correlator del fotón. Los resultados de cada grupo de investigación debían presentarse a los patrocinadores, con la característica que solo el jefe de proyecto del grupo y su superior asistían a dichas reuniones. 2) CUAL ES EL PROBLEMA ? Mal manejo de emociones por parte de Bob cuando se le habla de algo que no sabe: problema de autoestima y/o liderazgo. Posible problema de manejo de personal que sabe más que el. Mal manejo de los conductos regulares por parte del Dr. Jerrold Mal manejo del tiempo por parte de B. Knowlton. Knowlton no es directo con las persona Bob Falto de Foco. Errático Falta de control de los miembros del equipo. El mal manejo al permitir de como una persona brillante e individualista, daña el ambiente del equipo, al tratar mal a sus compañeros (ignorantes). Aun sabiéndolo no toma decisiones, porque cree que al manifestar esto a él lo van a ver como débil, pero cuando su real debilidad era sentirse menos por no tener la mayor capacidad intelectual del equipo. comunicación diferencial, no igual con todos los miembros del equipo sobre todo al enfrentar problemas. Knowlton basaba su liderazgo solo en el conocimiento que el tenia (IQ), por eso acepto los atropellos de FESTER basado en que FESTR era más brillante que todos los miembros del......

Words: 1515 - Pages: 7

Bob Knowlton

...BOB KNOWLTON Description: The case examines the actions and interactions between Bob Knowlton, project head of 2 years at a laboratory, his boss, Doctor Jerrold and a new comer to the Laboratory-Simon Fester. Diagnosis: Bob Knowlton, the project head of the Simmons Laboratory feels intimidated and undermined by the presence of Simon Fester, a fresh and bubbly newcomer who has just joined the group and slowly taken over the group. Bob also feels that his authority and everything he has worked hard on in order establish structure within the group in the past two years is being challenged and destabilized by Fester. Theory: The case examines the actions and interactions between different individuals with different Personality traits and Locus of Control. Personality means how people affect others and how they understand and view themselves, as well as pattern of inner and outer measurable traits and the person –situation interaction (Luthans, 2011). Locus of Control describes the extent to which a person believes that his or her behavior has a direct impact on the events that follow (Garson& Stanwyck 1997). Bob, who has the Agreeableness/Introvert personality trait, is co-operative, warm, caring, good-natured, courteous and trusting. Bob is also quiet, concentrating, thinks before he speaks and reflective (Luthans, 2007). He did not know how to categorize Fester from the first moment he met him and the lack of proper introduction and communication as to why......

Words: 722 - Pages: 3

Bob Knowlton

...Description The case “Bob Knowlton”, by Alex Bavelas explains what happens between Bob Knowlton head of the Photon Lab and new member, Simon Fester, when he is introduced into the lab. Bob Knowlton was the newly appointed head of the Photon Lab and he was still getting accustomed to leading the team when Bob Knowlton’s boss Dr. Jerrold added a bright up in comer to their team Simon Fester. Bob Knowlton feels inferior to Simon Fester and since Dr. Jerrold had some kind of relationship with Simon Fester he felt he could not tell him how he felt. As a result of this Bob Knowlton finds a better position with more salary and takes the job immediately shocking both Dr. Jerold and Simon Fester. Diagnosis During the entire case one thing stood out as the underlying reason for Bob Knowlton leaving the Photon Lab and that was lack of communication which ultimately led to Bob Knowlton perceiving that his position as team lead was in danger. Before Simon Fester was even introduced to the team Dr. Jerrold should have spoken to Bob Knowlton and informed of his plans and what Simon Festers duties are as it pertains to the team. This would have changed the outcome of the case tremendously. Theory After reading this case I believe that there are two main theories that ultimately caused Bod Knowlton to resign. The first one is that the Photon Lab Team was in the norming stage of their team development. Since Bob Knowlton was newly appointed the head of the Photon Lab but had been......

Words: 674 - Pages: 3

Bob Knowlton Case Study

...After reviewing the Bob Knowlton case study, many concepts that are affecting the communication skills are apparent. Different factors [age, beliefs, culture, gender] were taken in to consideration while reviewing the case. Bobs self concept tells the unique story of the case study. Bob begins his story with a positive self concept and ends with a negative one. Towards the beginning of the case Bob gains self confidence in his work knowing he is a productive worker. During the time Fester arrives and begins working, Bobs self concept fades. During the case, Bob allows Fester to take over the group meetings and even take over his primary meeting as the project head. Eventually Bobs self concept plummets to next to nothing and Bob seeks a new job. Bob let social comparison steer him on to another career path in result to his “private me” being perceived as “not good enough.” The roles of the characters of the case study affect how each and every character interacts with one another. Bob approaches Jerrold with loyal work information, however he never felt comfortable disclosing his own discomforts with Fester being present in fear of showing weakness in his position. As the group began to break up Bob confronted Oliver and Davenport to get a sense of the reason for the splitting, yet did not confront Leak due to his role as a close colleague to Fester. Social needs affect the communication within the characters of the case study. Bob Knowlton loses his sense of control......

Words: 487 - Pages: 2

Bob Knowlton

...Team assignment on case analysis of Bob Knowlton Identify the various factors that is contributing to the interpersonal dynamics between Knowlton and Fester in their team. Bob Knowlton - Felt that his leadership was at stake because a) Jerrold was extremely impressed with Fester and also was expressing that openly with the team b) Fester was very sharp and competent and had solved some old problems c) He felt that Fester was slowly taking over leadership informal control of the team - Unable to discuss his opinions/feelings/conflicts with Jerrold and teammates a) although Jerrold and Bob share an open relationship, Bob has not indicated to Jerrold that he is having a problem. Because of this Jerrold also does not have a hint what is going on in Bob’s mind b) Bob should have communicated to Fester his roles and responsibilities while he was working in Bob’s team c) ? - Reiterating the research lab’s and the team’s way of functioning when Fester confronted the team with his own philosophy of research. As a result of this Bob may have lost some self-esteem and the respect of his team members. - In the face of Fester’s brilliance and challenge to his leadership, Bob did not respond in the manner in which the leader of the team should have done inability to exercise authority and control when parity in team is disturbed. As a result his self-confidence in his capabilities reduced. Fester - In the first meeting with Bob, he tried to over project himself.......

Words: 382 - Pages: 2