Banning Merijuana

In: Social Issues

Submitted By xoshnaw
Words 385
Pages 2
Banning substances such as marijuana, cocaine, and methamphetamine in some countries and allowing other substances such as alcohol, tobacco and caffeine is not inconsistent. The reason for this is that these substances differ in many ways. We can distinguish their effects on human mind. Substances like marijuana, cocaine, and methamphetamine should be banned through government policies because they are dangerous on the person who uses them and on the society. If we look at countries that in which a lot of individuals are addicted to these drugs we can see their negative effects on the society. Their result of using these drugs is obvious in their daily lives. One of the obvious results is that it becomes addictive and the user’s primary goal is to find these drugs and take them. This will result in them ignoring their jobs, education, family, and their lives. It could become as addictive as they will be willing to do anything to get these drugs. These drugs usually have very bad side effects on the person who takes them. It also has more dangers on human health in the long run since it could damage the person’s brain. Since these drugs are also expensive the user and the addict will have to spend a lot of money to get them which will result in them ignoring other aspects of their lives and it may cause them to become homeless, and for parents to lose the custody of their children .
However, the drugs such as alcohol, tobacco and caffeine are different in how they affect the user’s life. These drugs could be taken by the person without affecting their lives or others around them. For example. The people who smoke usually have normal lives and they can work and go about their lives without harming anyone other than the long run health risk for the user such as lung cancer. Alcohol affects people’s minds but its effect is relatively less than the other substances…...

Similar Documents

Banning of the Burqa in France

...already had a seemingly good grasp on the support level they would get if the law were passed. On April 9, 2011, however, a group of 61 protestors against the law had to be taken away in police vans and detained. While the majority of the French population is not affected by this law, a small group of Muslim women (and a pool of potential tourist) are. In 2009, French President, Nicholas Sarkozy made a statement claiming that religious face veils were “not welcome” in France because they goes against the country’s secular values ("French Senate Bans Burqa: Bill awaits President Nicholas Sarkozy’s signature" September 14, 2010). This essentially sparked the discussion and consideration of a banning on religious face veils, namely traditional Muslim burqas and niqabs. The rationale behind the banning is that it not only goes against the countries secular values of equality and dignity, but it also “imprisons women” and causes a safety issue for the citizens of the country (Ristici April 11, 2011). While freedom of religion and religious expression is practiced in France, the law under which the ban exists was passed with the reasoning that it made the nation’s citizen to feel threatened therefore going against the Declaration of Human Rights and of the Citizen, which states that the actions of one individual cannot impede the well-being of another. While the grounds of this law may seem to be in the best interest of the French citizens, one would have to wonder if these are......

Words: 1941 - Pages: 8

Banning Books Portraying Violence

...Fabiola Rocha-Negrete Mr. Alkire English 1A, Sat. Class 27 October 2012 Banning Books Portraying Violence How much can a book that portrays violence affect a high school student? It can affect a student in many ways. In fact, it has more impact when a student reads a book that portrays violence than violent video games or movies. Rebecca Dawkins’s essay “Why Banning Books Isn’t Always Bad” discusses how many “concerned group of parents regularly pressure school boards to keep controversial classics out of the classroom” because of the violence and immoral values they portray for underage students. Books like “Valley of the Dolls by Jacqueline Susann (about three young women who abuse drugs to escape the pressures of show business); The Godfather by Mario Puzo (about the Italian-American mafia); and In Cold Blood by Truman Capote (about two real-life mass murderers)” are what should be kept out of high schools because those types of books for students who are exposed to the everyday dangers of drugs, gangs, and violence in schools make it seem okay in these books. Dawkins goes further on explaining how many high school teachers, including herself, agree with parents in the sense that these books are not age appropriate to be taught in a high school classroom especially in a setting where all of these issues are present everyday. I totally agree with Rebecca Dawkins that high school students would not relate to most characters in controversial books, teachers have no......

Words: 860 - Pages: 4

Banning Soft Drinks in Schools

...Banning Soft Drinks in Schools Many parents would agree that soft drinks do not belong in public schools or possibly any schools with minors. Soft drinks being provided to children to consume at their own leisure can only create problems. This something, as a parent, I strongly believe. School officials need to be more concerned with the health of their students when it comes to these sugary drinks being provided at our children’s expense. Some of the problems created by having soft drink provided in schools are it promotes obesity, unsupervised consumption, and tooth decay. First, one major problem with soft drinks in schools is it promotes obesity. Our society has a growing problem with obesity. How can we tell our children to eat and drink better if we are providing them junk such as soft drinks? Children who are already obese shouldn’t have to put up with the temptations of soft drinks when they should be worried about their health. Obesity is a serious issue that can cause problem such as heart disease or diabetes. When we provide our children soft drinks their blood sugar can go through the roof, only causing the problems I mentioned before. Second, children are more likely to consume soft drinks when they have no supervision to tell them no. My children are not allowed to drink soft drinks at all. That’s not to say if it’s provided at their leisure they will refrain. If there are no teacher rights for them to tell the student they......

Words: 515 - Pages: 3

Banning of Cell Phones

...BANNING OF CELL PHONES Ladies and Gentlemen, Good Afternoon, in our world today cell phones play an important part of our lives. I am here today to persuade you to ban the using of your cell phone while you are driving. I will give you some statistics that involves the using of your cell phone while you are driving whether it is talking or texting. In today’s world cell phones have become an important part in our lives. How many of you here today own a cell phone? How many of you have used your cell phone while you are driving? Please be honest and let me see a show of hands. As you can see pretty much everybody here is guilty. I myself am guilty of driving while talking and texting. As soon as our phone rings or beeps for a text message, we reach for our phone to answer. There is only one good thing about a cell phone and that is no matter where you are at you can always keep in contact with others. The using of our cell phone while we are driving has become such a distraction that it has become very dangerous. (2010, NHTSA) It is so dangerous that cell phone usage has been compared to drunk driving or driving under the influence of drugs. (2012, NHTSA) We all need to stop using our cell phones while we are driving. Accidents, injuries, and even death have increased tremendously. (2010, NHTSA) People are talking and texting on their cell phones and not paying attention to the road. We all need to support the banning of cell phone use and make the......

Words: 824 - Pages: 4

Cell Phones Banning

...TITLE: Why Banning the Use of Cell Phones While Driving Should Be Mandatory Nationwide? A. General Purpose: Persuade B. Specific Purpose: Persuade my audience that banning the use of cell phones while driving should be mandatory nationwide. C. Central idea: Cell phones are as common in the market today as a wrist watch on your arm. Everyone has one including the very young as well as the extreme elderly. People are constantly talking, texting, playing games or surfing on the Internet on their smart phones. These devices are harmless until individuals decided to get behind the wheel and drive. Therefore, the government should pass legislation to ban cell phone usage while driving nationwide. I. Introduction The statistics for the number of deaths and life-altering accidents for our younger drivers are staggering. Texting while driving causes 11 teen deaths EVERY DAY. That is 11 families, schools, and communities that are forever missing children, classmates, teammates, and that great kid next door because they took that 5 seconds it takes to text that they were running late, or whatever not-so-important message they sent. Additionally, it is still legal in 11 states to text while driving; only 10 fully prohibit cell phones while driving. According to the NHTSB, texting is 6 times more dangerous than driving while intoxicated. Finally, texting is not a teen-only problem with 47% of adults admitting to texting while driving. A. Distracted driving is an......

Words: 307 - Pages: 2

The Battle of Banning Laptops

...Student vs. Teacher: The Battle of Banning Laptops As a college student, having a laptop is essential to developing good grades in your classes, other than studying. However, students mistreat their privileges of having laptops in class. In both Andrew Goldstein's "Keep Online Poker Out of the Classroom: Why Professors should Ban Laptops" and Elena Choy's "Laptops in the Classroom? No Problem", they both explain how laptops can be a nuisance or an advantage for college students. While they both have proficient arguments, they differ with what they feel is right; as one argument is coming from a college student, the other is coming from a professor in college. Surprisingly, while the battle of the student and teacher began, will be surprise with who wants to ban laptops. Andrew Goldstein, a student from Tufts University, is one of the students that use his laptop in some of his class. Although he does use his laptop for some of his class, he thinks that using laptops in some lager classes are a burden. Laptops are open as the professor talks, but are the students really paying attention? Some students use their laptops for other purposes, like playing online games or online shopping. Goldstein stated that he see "screens that show students are playing poker or shopping online" Also, while others are doing everything except what they are supposed to be doing, their colleagues are distracted by what they are doing on their laptops, especially with games; Goldstein thought the......

Words: 760 - Pages: 4

Banning Cells Phoone

...Why banning cell phone while driving should be mandatory nationwide My intention for you to take from this speech is to inform you why it is a good idea to banned all cell phone usage while driving. It was normal for people to drive drunk and not bother to wear a seatbelt 50 years ago. Eventually, everyone realized how bad of an idea this was and now driving drunk and not wearing a seatbelt are both illegal. Today, many argue that texting and talking on phones while driving is just as bad, if not worse, than driving drunk. Back in 2006, the University of Utah found that, "... people are as impaired when they drive and talk on a cell phone as they are when they drive intoxicated at the legal blood-alcohol limit" of 0.08 percent, which is the minimum level that defines illegal drunken driving in most U.S. states. Companies like AT&T have created campaigns that encourage cell phone users to avoid texting while driving at all costs. Using a cell phone while driving is now illegal in certain states across the country. "Thirty-eight states have laws restricting or outlawing the use of electronic devices while driving," U.S. Transportation Secretary, Ray LaHood said last year. But people still use their cell phones while driving. Image how a two minute conversation on phone while driving could change your life or the life of another. A crash can occur in less than one second, but could affect you or someone else for life. There are a thousand ways to die in a crash,...

Words: 1453 - Pages: 6

Banning Handguns

...Resolved: That the private ownership of handguns should be banned in the United States. I have three strong starting points as to why handguns should be banned in the U.S. A.) Banning handguns makes for a safer environment for obvious reasons. If handguns are banned, the amount of crazed lunatics with a gun should decrease. And anyone who disobeys the law and tries to harm their environment with a handgun, the proper authority will step in charge to take care of them. Authorities such as police are the only ones who have the necessity of a handgun. Of course the case would be made for handguns to be used for personal self-defense. But a handgun is not needed for self-defense when there are other options such as pepper spray. B.) Banning handguns eliminate the chance of small children obtaining a handgun. Several cases have been reported where small children find their parents handgun in the house when the parent is not looking and end up firing it. In fact, gun accidents kill an average of 500 children a year in the U.S. and kill twice as many kids as cancer does according to USAToday. Banning handguns in the USA eliminate the chance of this happening and would make for a safer environment for children at home. C.) The second amendment stating “The right to bear arms” is outdated. The amendment was created at a time where the federal government found it necessary to have a strong, “well-regulated militia” with the federal government doing the regulating. In...

Words: 301 - Pages: 2

Why Banning Cell Phones

...Why banning the use of cell phones while driving should be mandatory nationwide A. General Purpose: Persuade B. Specific Purpose: Persuade the audience with the dangers of using a cell phone while driving. C. Central idea: Our cell phones have become a part of our daily lives, where we multitask more than ever. Taking photos, texting, listening to music, Facebooking, instagram and even uploading things online are also part of the distraction. The use of cell phones while driving is harming the lives of so many families. There are accidents everyday because of the use of phones and many other distractions while driving. People need to take responsibility behind the wheel. The law is the most powerful tool that we have to stop the use of cell phones while diving. I. Introduction Its proven tha driving amd using the phones at the same time is the same as being under the influence and driving. People are too busy looking for phone number, answering text messages, taking pictures and updating statues while driving instead of paying attention to the road which causes accidents. Accidents Happens daily because of this. A. Key point #1 Have the law for texting and driving be reinforced. B. Key point #2 Have capaigns and Aids against texting and driving. C. Key point #3 Safety is first; the safety of your family, Friends and others is more important than a text or a phone call. II. Body of the Presentation A. Main Point #1 1. Supporting......

Words: 275 - Pages: 2

Book Banning

...Book Banning In a country founded on freedom and the right to exercise that freedom, most Americans are unaware that books are banned in certain areas and or schools across the United States. Book banning is the censorship and removal of written materials due to objections from a group or individual person, based on personal views, of material and content. Book banning has been a part of society since before books first started being mass produced and distributed. Between the years 2000 and 2009 over 5,000 book banning challenges were reported to the American Library Association’s Office for Intellectual Freedom (OIF). Over 1,500 were challenged due to sexual explicitness. Over 2,500 were initiated by a parent or guardian and nearly 2,000 were initiated by a school (ALA.org. Banned and Challenged Books. Frequently Challenged Books). However, it seems that in any situation on the topic of book banning only explains the reasons behind the removal of the material. But, the rules and guidelines for banning written materials has never been formally established. According to a 2011 Journal of Law and Education from the Jefferson Law Book Company there had been more than 250 attempts at book banning by school districts in the previous four years in 31 states in the U.S. Due to lack of resistance and reduced media awareness more that 85% of book banning goes unreported. (Brenyo, Michael. 40 J.L. & Educ. 541. Introduction) Every year, OIF, gathers the names of the top 10 books...

Words: 1370 - Pages: 6

Why Banning Hunting Is Not the Answer

...Why Banning Hunting is Not the Answer “Hunting animals should be banned!” insist the animal rights proponents. “We have a God given right to hunt animals and you can’t stop us!” shout back the resolute hunters defensively. Is anyone really listening to the ‘other side’? In a recent Africa Geographic Magazine article Simon Espley states the problem concisely. “The thing about hunting is that the topic is so polarizing that it prevents meaningful discourse between people who probably have more in common than they care to admit.” (Espley) Hunting allows hunters to have food for their families and reduces habitat overcrowding, so it should not be banned. Trophy hunting, on the other hand, is very controversial and deserves a closer look at whether or not it should continue to be permitted. There are be two sincere sides to the decision to ban or not ban hunting. Both sides agree on many basic ideas. For instance, animal rights proponents and hunting enthusiasts both believe in protecting endangered species, protecting ecosystems or habitats of all animals, humane treatment of animals, and supporting animal preserves in many parts of the world. Most of the bitterness is driven by the refusal to recognize how much they all have in common. Trophy hunters often become incensed more about their right to hunt than the rightness of the hunt they are paying for. Legitimate concern over corruption in the area of trophy hunting safaris has brought about widespread anger within......

Words: 1033 - Pages: 5

Banning Cellphones While Driving

...Why Banning the Use of Cell Phones While Driving Should be Mandatory Nationwide. Cellular phones have served us in many effective ways. They connect people when they are away and need information. They allow us to stay in touch with family and friends. In essence, they keep us communicating. While they are good, they can cause a lot of problems on our roads. Do you believe that using a cell phone while driving causes a driver to be impaired as a driver who is driving under the influence of alcohol? Well, according to research done by psychologists at the University of Utah, “people are as impaired when they drive and talk on a cell phone as they are when they drive intoxicated at a legal blood alcohol limit 0.08 percent, which is the minimum level of an illegal drunken driver in most U.S. states.” Today, more people are being drunken by their cell phones. This impaired driving, according to the psychologists, is also causing a lot of road users to respond slower in many ways than if they were sober. The drivers, they said, take a longer time to hit the brakes, take a slower time to get back to normal speed after breaking and are more capable of being involved in an accident. Can you see the danger in this type of driving? Can you see what could possible happen to pedestrians or other drivers under this type of driving? If as a people we care about our lives as well as the lives of others, then, law makers would enact laws to ban the use of cell phones while......

Words: 1310 - Pages: 6

Businesses Banning Teens

...a decrease in profits during the school months, Mr. Jones realize that many of his faithful, adult,  wealthier, customers mostly business people from the offices that surround his restaurant  downtown we're staying away from his business due to the havoc high school students cause  every day at lunch. Therefore, he proclaimed the hours between noon and 3 PM “quiet lunch”  time, during which students will be banned from the premises. Having those teens out during  lunch hours will help businesses tremendously by increasing revenue.   Therefore, that is why businesses should have the right to ban teens. Having no teens  around will encourage business people, who spend more money on their lunches and need a  peaceful break from their busy days, back to the restaurant. Banning teenagers may have a few  withdraws, however, the good outweighs the bad.             ...

Words: 347 - Pages: 2

Banning Junk Won't Stop It

..."Banning Junk Food Isn't the Answer to Curbing Obesity." USA TODAY 13 Aug. 2007. Academic Search Complete. Web. 26 Oct. 2010. According to the article, “Banning junk food isn’t the answer to curbing obesity,” in USA TODAY, banning junk food on school campus isn’t what needs to be done. The article states that in fact a ban of junk food in school will only escalate the problem even more than actually decreasing it. The magazine states, “studies show that when placed in environments that outlaw "bad" foods, children develop obsessions with these forbidden foods and then binge on them.” (USA TODAY) Meaning that if a ban was placed into action that kids would actually go out of their way to eat a lot of junk food at one time before or after school hours. So to ban junk food from school’s would not be the answer to decreasing the obesity in the youth today. USA Today suggests that instead of just banning junk food, “We should be showing students that any food can be enjoyed in moderation.”(USA TODAY) Now the magazine does show that there are some school districts that have changed the food selections for the better. Such as taking white rice and replacing it with brown, or buying whole grain breads, using multigrain pasta, and placing a variety of fruits and vegetables to purchase. Some districts have even implemented programs that promote a certain vegetable and fruit sold in certain months with the addition of encouraged physical activity. Other suggestions were made as......

Words: 440 - Pages: 2

Banning Prayer in Public Schools

...America’s Decline: Banning Prayer in Public Schools Raymond Ballou PHI 200 Instructor: Michelle Loudermilk 3/31/12 America’s Decline: Banning Prayer in Public Schools A very controversial widespread issue today is the right to have volunteer prayer in public schools. This issue has been constantly debated for years whether prayer in public schools should be permitted. For more than 200 years, public schools were allowed voluntary prayer. Our forefathers built our nation on Christian values. The first English settlers came to America for the right to freedom and to worship God in their own way. In Colonial America, most schools were run by the churches. The first settlers in America felt that it was important that children learned to read so that they could read their Bibles. Prayer has been a part of our culture as long as there have been public schools; this helped the students develop morals and learn right from wrong. School prayer was a natural part of the settler’s school life. There is a casual relationship between taking prayer out of our schools and the downfall of our society today. The basic dispute over this issue is that it violates The First Amendment of the Constitution of the United States and the separation of church and state. The First Amendment of the Constitution of the United States gives every individual the same rights. One right is the constitutional protection for the free exercise of religion. The second right is prohibition of the......

Words: 2610 - Pages: 11