Assess the Strengths of the Uk Constitution

In: Business and Management

Submitted By 10constm
Words 738
Pages 3
Assess the strengths of the UK constitution [25 marks]

A constitution is a set of principles, that may be uncodified (unwritten) or codified (written), that relates to how power is distributed within a political system, and establishes how a state is to be organised and governed. Constitutions seek to establish duties, powers and functions of various institutions of government and contribute to defining the relationship between the state and the individuals, for example, defining the extent of civil liberty. The UK constitution helps provide legitimacy to those, of which, are in power, but also limits government power. Although the UK constitution is uncodified, as a whole, parts of the constitution are codified, for example, the European Convention on Human Rights is a codified part of British Law, even though it was designed and created by the Council of Europe, in 1950.

Firstly, the UK constitution, being uncodified, means that it is flexible and can be easily adapted to changing circumstances, which could include referendum use and the continuous changing role of the House of Lords. The UK constitution is often called 'organic', which means that the constitution is rooted in society, and consequently means that when society and it's values change the UK constitution can adapt and change to society, without delay or hesitation. Furthermore, because the UK constitution is uncodified, it allows Parliament to pass Acts, without long delays and also allows new, uncodified conventions to develop, in order to take into consideration of the change, both socially and politically. An example, of the UK constitution's flexibility, after the 9/11 attack, in New York 2001. If the UK had had a codified and entrenched constitution, it would have been extremely demanding and difficult for Parliament to pass a large range of anti-terrorist plans, due to the numerous…...

Similar Documents

Critically Assess the Virtues and Shortcomings of Britain’s ‘Un-Codified’ Constitution

...Critically assess the virtues and shortcomings of Britain’s ‘un-codified’ Constitution Britain are one of the few countries in the world that still posses and un-codified constitution, other states that posses un-codified constitutions are New Zealand and Israel. A constitution is a set of rules which guidelines what the people of the nation and the government have the rights to do, these rules or guidelines are normally printed in one sovereign place. An un-codified constitution differs from this as is not one sovereign book or piece of writing that outlines the rules of the state. This short answer will assess the strengths and weakness of Britain having an un-codified constitution. The first strength to consider is the fact that our un-codified constitution is more flexible then a codified constitution. Many nations find it difficult to pass legislation because the constitution holds the government accountable and protects the individuals. Example of this could be after terrorist attacks Britain was able to quickly pass legislation detaining terror suspects for longer period of time, where as other nations constitutions protected the individuals liberties and prevented their governments from detaining suspects for long periods of time. From the first argument we can see that flexibility is a strength of an un-codified constitution, however it can also be a weakness. Without the codified constitution there is no checks on the government other then the opposition, a...

Words: 579 - Pages: 3

Make Out a Case Against the Adoption of Codified Constitution for the Uk

...against the adoption of codified constitution for the UK A constitution is a system of rules which describes the structure and powers of the government, the relationship between different parts of government and the relationship between government and citizens. The UK has a un-codified constitution which means it is not written out in one single document. Unlike codified constitutions which are, such as the US constitution. There are many arguments against the idea of a codified constitution. One argument is that codified constitutions are considered inflexible, because higher law is more difficult to change than statute law. It’s easier to introduce an act of parliament than to amend a constitution. The UKs constitution is flexible as it is not entrenched. This is good because the constitution stays relevant and up to date. For codified constitutions it is difficult to change and adapt so this is a downside. A second argument against agreeing to a codified constitution is that parliamentary sovereignty would be effectively ended. The principle of parliamentary sovereignty states that parliament can make unmake or amend any law it wishes. With a codified constitution parliament would not be able to make, unmake or amend any law it wishes due to the existence of the constitution. This is because a codified constitution would act as higher law. Another point is that a new codified constitution in the UK is unnecessary. Codified constitutions may also not be the most......

Words: 297 - Pages: 2

Assess These Strengths and Weaknesses of Marxists Explanations of Crime

...Assess these strengths and weaknesses of Marxists explanations of crime Traditional Marxism is a structural theory which sees society as a structure in which the economic base determines the shape of the superstructure, which is made up of all the other social institutions, including the state, the law and the criminal justice system. Their function is to serve the ruling-class interests and maintain the capitalist society. Marxists agree that the law is enforced against powerless groups and that labelling often results in further deviance. They see crime and deviance as not coming from moral or biological defects but defects within social order and therefore crime is an inevitable part of capitalism as it stems from social inequality. For Marxists, crime is inevitable in capitalism because capitalism is criminogenic. Capitalism is based on the exploitation of the working class and therefore is particularly damaging to the working class which may give rise to crime. Alienation and the lack of control over their lives may lead to frustration and aggression, resulting in non-utilitarian crimes such as vandalism and violence. Crime may also be the only way they can obtain the consumer goods encouraged by capitalist advertising, resulting in utilitarian crimes such as theft. Therefore, it can be said a strength of the Marxist explanation of crime is that is it explains the causes of both utilitarian and non-utilitarian crime of the working class. However, one could argue that......

Words: 700 - Pages: 3

'the Uk Constitution Is No Longer Fit for Purpose, Dicuss

...‘The UK constitution is no longer fit for purpose.’ Discuss The UK constitution gives too much power to the executive because of the fusion of powers which makes a parliamentary government; government is in control of parliament. The government of the day can simply pass, repeal or amend any laws; the proposals can also be constitutional changes. This could lead to the possibility of an elective dictatorship to take place, the government that has the majority and comes into power can make constitutional changes and pass any laws with the assistance of the party whip system it possible to make all MPs from the majority party to vote a certain way for example john major had expelled 8 anti-euro sceptic MPs to keep the conservative government united and to pass the laws. Although it can be argued that party whip system makes a decisive government, the MPs who are disciplined are forced to represent the party instead of their constituents. If there was to be a separation of powers it would ensure checks and balances and not give excessive power to government. Also a codified constitution will not allow the government of the day to easily repeal the current constitutional laws that are in place. The royal prerogative powers which was handed to the prime minister by the monarch is fundamentally undemocratic, it allows the government to declare war against anyone even if the public view differs. The public didn’t get to decide if the prime minister should have this power. It was...

Words: 744 - Pages: 3

Should the Uk Have a Codified Constitution?

...the UK have a codified constitution? A constitution is a set of rules that seek to establish the duties, powers and functions of government. Constitutions can be uncodified, like the UK’s at the moment, or codified in the case of the USA’s for example. A codified constitution is authoritative, entrenched and judiciable, everything that an uncodified constitution isn’t. On the one hand there are many arguments supporting the view that the UK should adopt a codified constitution. If a codified constitution were introduced, the key constitutional rules would be collected together in a single document, and they would be more clearly defined than in an ‘unwritten’ constitution where rules are spread across many different documents. A codified constitution would create less confusion about the meaning of constitutional rules and greater certainty that they can be enforced. A second argument supporting a codified constitution is limited government. A codified constitution would cut government down to size. A codified constitution would effectively end the principle of parliamentary sovereignty and subsequently elective dictatorship. Elective dictatorship is a constitutional imbalance in which executive power is abused to allow governments to win elections. In the UK, it is reflected in the ability of a government to act in any way it pleases as long as it maintains control of the House of Commons. It would not be possible for government to interfere with the constitution due......

Words: 716 - Pages: 3

The Uk Government Is Constrained by the Constitution

...The UK government is constrained by the British Constitution Constitutions are fundamental rules that regulate how a state or any other type of organisation is supposed to be governed. A quote by the UCL Constitution Unit “Constitutions organise, distribute and regulate state power. They set out the structure of the state, the major state institutions, and the principles governing their relations with each other and with the state’s citizens”. The points I would like to raise that would support this statement are that the UK constitution is uncodified, Parliamentary Sovereignty, government control over parliament. However there are major points that would contradict with this statement; Rule of law, European court of human rights, referendums. The fact that the British Constitution is uncodified means that it can be flexible which means that I can be easily changed and adapted according to the circumstance, also it means that not every single thing is written down on one document it is spread out in many. This means that once there is a matter that the government needs to deal with they won’t be restricted by the constitution. For example the US constitution is codified which means that everything is on one document which would restrict them from doing anything that may be wrong now but believed to right in the past. Furthermore a law that is written by the US constitution that has mainly obstructed the way people want to live their lives is “people have the right to bare......

Words: 836 - Pages: 4

Does the Uk Have a Constitution?

...examination of criminal liability, the problem question can be concluded to show that P is liable for offences against every individual. It is of course, up to the discretion of the judge to decide, thus only probable outcomes can be referred to until taken to court. P can most probably be proved liable under both s.47 and s.20 of the OAP Act 1861 for assault occasioning actual bodily harm against R and PC Todd and grievous bodily harm against S. As earlier stated it is debatable with Q until the level of harm is clear, but P is likely to be liable for s.20 GBH following the definition of ‘lacerations’. He can also be found liable of battery under s.39 of the Criminal Justice Act 1988 for pulling R’s hair. Bibliography Cases (UK): C (a minor) v Eisenhower [1984] QB 331 Collins v Wilcock [1984] 3 All ER 374 Director of Public Prosecutions v Smith [1961] AC 290 Director of Public Prosecutions v Smith (Michael Ross) [2006] 2 All ER 16 Director of Public Prosecutions v Smith (Michael Ross) - [2006] 2 All ER 16 21 (Creswell J) Director of Public Prosecutions v Smith (Michael Ross) - [2006] 2 All ER 16 20 (Sir Igor Judge) Moriarty v Brooks (1834) 172 ER 1419 R v Bollom [2003] EWCA Crim 2846 R v Brady [2006] EWCA Crim 2413 R v Chan-Fook [1994] 2 All ER 552 R v Cunningham [1957] 2 QB 396 R v Ireland [1997] QB 114 R v Miller [1954] 2 QB 282 R v Mowatt [1968] 1 QB 421 R v Savage, R v Parmenter [1992] 1 AC 699 R v Venna [1976] Q.B. 421 R v Woolin......

Words: 1741 - Pages: 7

Strength of Uk Constitution

...A constitution is a set of principles, which may be codified or uncodified, that establishes the distribution of power within, that establishes the distribution of power within, a political institution. They limit government jurisdiction the rights of citizens and the method of amending the constitution itself. The UK Constitution is uncodified which means the UK constitution is not organised into singular document, but written in alternative ways for example a Convention. I will talk about the following factors, Executive Power, Modernisation and Flexibility which is the way ill assess the UK’s Constitution Executive Power is a strength of the UK Constitution, due to the UK Constitution being unwritten and uncodified the government can be more powerful and decisive easier as they do have to follow a strict set of rules. For example the 1997 Government rearranged the House of Lords with reforms this was quickly done and this was due to the UK not having a constitution. However, the liberals state that not having a constitution and having a strong government threatens the individual rights, the position of minorities and the influence of public opinion. For example Tony Blair decided in 2005 to declare war on Iraq without consulting the people this led to backlash from the public and protests. However, the General Elections is to choose a representative, one of the perks of having a representative is they can use their specialist knowledge to make decisions on the public’s......

Words: 696 - Pages: 3

Assess the Causes and Consequences for Changes in the Uk Population

...Assess the causes and consequences for changes in the UK population This essay will assess the causes and consequences for changes in the UK population, one cause of this is the decline in the death rate which will be looked at in this essay. Another cause of changes in the population, that will be assessed in this essay, is migration and the patterns of it that have a large impact on the characteristics of a country's population. Many sociologists have studied these topics and some that will be looked at in this essay are Thomas McKeown (1972), N.L Tranter (1996) and many more. The first topic to be assessed in this essay is the death rate in the UK, the death rate is currently declining in the UK and there are several reasons for this decline. According to N.L Tranter (1996), over three quarters of the decline in the death rate from 1850 to 1970 was due to a fall in the number of deaths from infectious diseases. Since deaths from infectious disease were commonest amongst the younger generations, it is not surprising that most of the decline in the death rate came from infants, children and young adults. This decrease in the death rate is part of what has led to a growing population in the UK. However, this is not the only reason for a decline in the death rate leading to an increase in the population in the UK. Thomas McKeown (1972) also points out that improved nutrition is also part of what has led to a decreasing death rate, he believes it is accountable for up......

Words: 1247 - Pages: 5

Should the Uk Have a Codified Constitution?

...Should the UK have a codified Constitution? (40 marks) A constitution is the fundamental and entrenched rules governing the conduct of an organization or nation state, and it establishes it concept, character and structure. It lays out how a nation is to be run and who runs it. It sets out how government is elected and the powers of the state. It usually is occupied by a Bill of Rights, which is a document that lays out the individual rights of the people of that nation. A constitution cannot be removed as it has been entrenched in the foundations of that country. It can only be altered but as it can be seen in America, this is extremely difficult to do. Within the UK, we currently do not have a codified/ written constitution but has unwritten constitution. This means that our constitution isn’t written down in a single document but is made up of several documents, Acts of Parliament, laws, judicial precedent and traditions. Furthermore, the UK doesn’t have a Bill of Rights but has its rights highlighted under the Human Rights Act 1998, which highlights all the individuals rights. Under the Labour government, there was massive constitutional reforms between the periods of 1997 and 2010 and brought about a greater codification of the British constitution. The Conservative and Liberal Democrat coalitions introduced further constitutional reforms. In this essay I will highlight the argument that the constitution shouldn’t be codified but also that why there are......

Words: 1343 - Pages: 6

The Uk Would Benefit from a Codified Constitution

...‘The UK would benefit greatly from the introduction of a fully codified constitution’ Discuss Plan Arguments against * Ruins the doctrine of sovereignty-Parliament sovereignty is effectively beaten. * Judges have to police the constitution and effectively interpreted. – Threat of judicial tyranny. Codified constitutions cannot be interpreted by the public so the judges would have to interpret it which could bring out preferences and values of senior judges * Un-necessary- doesn’t Philly limit governments * Hard to change * Easily outdated * Legal documents created at one point of time rather than a document which has been endorsed by history and created over time Arguments for * Clear rules * One codified document * Limited government * Neutral interpretation * Protecting rights of individual liberty * Education value – highlight certain values and strengthen citizenship Introduction The argument of a codified constitution has been a debated subject for a long time within the UK political spectrum. The argument stands at present moment that if the UK should or should not implement a codified constitution. Both sides of the argument withstand staggering evidence both in favour and factors denouncing the idea being drawn at the same time. The fact of a codified constitution would invoke a greater judicial intervention within the UK – maybe even put the state under risk of judicial tyranny. On codified constitution......

Words: 1530 - Pages: 7

‘Assess the View That the Us Constitution Ensures Limited Government’

...The US Constitution, written in Philadephia in 1787 by the Founding Fathers was the product of the revolutionary war of independence, with it’s foundations strongly influenced by the works of political theorists such as Montesquieu and Locke. The Founding Fathers favoured a government that prevented any individual or particular group becoming tyrannical. Furthermore, they strongly opposed the notion of excessive government power, seen as the potential threat to individual freedom, wanting to protect minorities as well as the population as a whole, from arbitrary or unjust rule. Consequently, the Founding Fathers outlined main provisions within the US constitution in order to avoid tyranny: the separation of powers, a federal structure of government and also providing citizens inalienable and entrenched rights through the implementation of the Bill of Rights. Arguably, these provisions as a result mostly ensure, as the Founding Fathers had hope to achieve, limited government, in so much as the size and scope of the federal government is limited to an extent in which it is necessary only for the common good of people. The separation of powers prevalent in the USA, whereby political power is distributed between the executive, the legislature and the judiciary branches of government, were adopted from the Founding Fathers by the principles of Montesquieu, who argued for a separation of powers into legislative, executive and judiciary branches in order to avoid tyranny. This......

Words: 2217 - Pages: 9

Advantages and Disadvantages of the Uks Constitution

...A constitution is a body of fundamental principles or established models according to which a state or is acknowledged to be governed. The UK’s constitution is part-written and uncodified. There is evidence the UK’s constitution is strong and successful, however there is evidence to also suggest that the UK needs constitutional reform. One huge advantage of the UK constitution is its ability to be flexible and change according to modern opinions or issues. An uncodified or unfixed constitution like the UK’s allows it to me able to keep updated with new social and political situations. It easier to create an Act of Parliament according to a new situation, than to amend a codified constitution. For example, in reaction to this idea of ‘new politics’ and the public’s desire to be able to influence the government between elections, lead to the introduction of referendums in 1997. The UKs democracy has withstood the tale of time and is seen as a huge strength of the UK’s constitution. The UK’s constitution is an example of the UK’s custom and tradition linking generations and has been tested in history to prove that it works. The constitution has adapted and developed over time: it is a ‘living’ constitution due to the idea that it is able to grow. In despite of parliamentary sovereignty, there are a number of ways in which the democratic character of the UK is maintained and the power of the government scrutinized and reduced where necessary. For instance, the House of Lords......

Words: 754 - Pages: 4

Assess the Us Constitution

...Assess the US Constitution The United States Constitution is the supreme law of the USA. The Constitution, originally comprising seven articles, delineates the national frame of government. Its first three articles entrench the doctrine of the separation of powers, whereby the federal government is divided into three branches: the legislative, consisting of the bicameral Congress; the executive, consisting of the President; and the judiciary, consisting of the Supreme Court and other federal courts. Since the Constitution came into force in 1789, it has been amended twenty-seven times. In general, the first ten amendments, known collectively as the Bill of Rights, offer specific protections of individual liberty and justice and place restrictions on the powers of government. The majority of the seventeen later amendments expand individual civil rights. At seven articles and twenty-seven amendments, it is the shortest written constitution in force. The Constitution of the United States was the first constitution of its kind, and has influenced the constitutions of other nations. However, it has many flaws, firstly the amendment process is too difficult, thereby making it near impossible to change it. Secondly the power of judicial review gives the unelected unaccountable Supreme Court too much power. Thirdly the constitution leads to gridlock and finally some parts make no sense in modern society and don’t work as the Framers intended. Nevertheless there are positives;......

Words: 1737 - Pages: 7

Assess the Arguments for Codifying the Constitution

...recent years there has been much debate within Parliament over the possible codification of the British Constitution and it is always a topic that people often find very hard to agree on. Though some parts of what may be a codified constitution have been introduced, such as The Human Rights Act which established a codified set of rules and the introduction of devolution, Britain is currently uncodified and so this brings up the arguments of whether update the system or not The initial argument for the change is it was remove the transparency of rules and laws, the key constitutional are collected into a single document all clearly stated with great difficulty of alteration. This portrays exactly what the beliefs of Parliament are and restricts law breaking. Not only does this deter people from committing offences but also makes it simple to enforce as every charge wish be on the same wavelength. An argument to contradict this however would be that's not every crime committed is the same so the variation in the punishment given would also have to vary and with the defining of the law there is actually potential for it to become less democratic. Along with this as times are forever changing and technology is being updated, the demand for laws to be amended is crucial as without it people could technically exploit the system ‘legally’. Another bonus of a codified Constitution is the fact that it is authoritative meaning it is a higher-level and so it lines all political......

Words: 1062 - Pages: 5