Anomie Theory

In: Social Issues

Submitted By lbonnell95
Words 591
Pages 3
The anomie theory began to appear around 1893. The term was first introduced by Emile Durkeheim to explain “deregulation” occurring in society. Robert K. Merton took some of Durkeheim’s ideas, but his idea was that an anomie occurs when the social system is unable to maintain control through a use of societal norms. These norms were described as the societal goals and the approved means to attain those goals. Depending on the different combination of whether a person does/does not follow the goals and/or means, they would be classified into one of five different categories. The five types of people Merton believed to exist was: conformist, innovator, ritualist, retreatist, and rebellionist. The first category is the conformist. According to Merton, most people follow this path. To be considered a conformist, one must seek to achieve the societal goals by the accepted societal means. An example of conforming behavior would be a person focusing on obtaining and maintaining a typical 9-5 job. Those who have no issues when it comes to obtaining the means to obtain goals are considered “real” conformists. The second category is the innovator. This category is the most common of the four deviant types. To be considered an innovator, one must seek to achieve the societal goals, but one would replace the accepted means with not approved means. An example of innovative behavior would be instead of a student taking time and studying to get an “A”, they cheat by looking at a neighbor’s test and gets the same “A”. A way to dissuade people from taking the innovative route is to impart more negative consequences for being deviant. Make it so the consequence of avoiding the appropriate means are worse than the results of achieving the goal in a deviant way. The third category is the ritualist. This category is also seen as bureaucratic behavior. To be considered a…...

Similar Documents

Durkehiem Theory

...Research Theories of Anti-Social Behaviour and highlight the key points. Functionalist Theory A theory that I have found that relates to Anti-Social Behaviour is the Durkheim Theory; does he believe that committing suicide is not a mental problem? I am now going to highlight the key points in this research task that I have found. As far as Individuals were concerned this separate’s sociology from psychology. Research shows that suicide occurred when anomie arose. Anomie means the lack of social standards in an individual. I will now provide 3 different examples to show my understanding. He compared 3 different religious groups, Jews, Catholics and Protestants so therefore he found Protestants were more likely to commit suicide more frequently than Jews. Jews were more connected to their community because there religion included many rituals that would cause them as a group to be closer together. In other terms Protestants committed suicide more often because they lacked ritualization. Durkheim is a functionalist which means his theory is based on institutions in society and therefore this shows how everything in a society works together. Durkheim argued that there is nothing deviant or criminal in any act so therefore the key is how a society reacts and responds to the act. So if we put it in other words there is nothing criminal if we decide it is. Durkheim had many views but the main one was he believed that crime was not normal in any society it was also therefore......

Words: 994 - Pages: 4

Social Theories of Crime

...Social Theories of Crime Linda Robuck AIU Online   Abstract This text seeks to make more understandable and explain what social theories are all about, using four different social theories. The beginning of this text will offer a general description or definition of not only what exactly social theories are, but also a description or definition for each of the four theories mentioned earlier. For each of the theories, information that will be included involves a description of each theory, a short history of each theory which will include information with respect to when the theory was proposed, who the relevant theorist or theorists associated with each theory were, strengths of each theory which explains criminal behavior, why each theory was important at the time of its proposal, weaknesses of each theory which explain criminal behavior, and particular examples that will correspond with each of the four theories being discussed. A theoretical application involving an individual who has recently been convicted of a crime will be provided. Along with information regarding the individual and their criminal deviance particular to them, a discussion will ensue in regard to which of the four theories would be most relevant in regard to further explanation of the deviant actions committed by the individual. Social Theories of Crime Introduction In the annals of the early nineteenth century, criminology can find its beginnings in a newly......

Words: 3689 - Pages: 15

Theories of Deviance

...neighborhood. Kody became a gang through the socialization process. The social learning theory can be applied in Kody’s case of developing deviant behaviors because he learnt deviance from the neighborhood he was living in. Kody was sent out of school then he started hanging around with one of the gangsters and through their interaction, he was initiated into the group and became one of them (Shakur 163). In the society they were living in, parents were not responsible for their children thus this led to an increase in deviant behaviors. The social conditions they were living in, exposed them to crime, they were in slums thus they had no class and lived a poor life. The anomie theory also applies to the monster Kody because he became a monster due to being brought up in a disadvantaged and minority group that lived in slums. The children in the neighborhood wanted class and they could only get it through crimes and robbery. Their parents did a lot of work to fend for them and they wanted to live a good life so they developed deviant behaviors of crime in order to gain class. Kody’s mother did several jobs ( Shakur 98). Kody experienced anomie because he came from a very low class that lived in slums and he had gone through abuse in his childhood so he opted for deviant behaviors to attain his goals and live like the people with class (Brumble 162). Furthermore, there was a cultural transmission theory in Kody’s life because he had moved in a society where norms were not......

Words: 1519 - Pages: 7

Anomie

...Emile Durkheim wrote about the concept of anomie. Anomie is when the state of normal behavior and societal norms, or how society is expected to conduct themselves, become unclear or confused. This concept was one that stated that when in a place of hardship, such as financial hardship, people were more likely to commit crimes, commit suicide or be otherwise “defiant.” Whether it is during an area of great hardship or great prosperity, anomie can occur. When jobs are hard to come by, and people are financially strained, they may turn to crime. It is possible that people are breaking into foreclosed houses, which are very prevalent in some areas, after the housing market crashed, and take the copper plumbing. They steal the plumbing and sell it for money. The houses are vacant, so the person breaking in might feel that they are not really stealing from anyone in particular. When Durkheim alleges that if we didn’t have deviants we would create them, I would like to present the example of marriage. In the early 1900’s marriage was a lifelong commitment, only to be broken by death. Since that time the divorce rate has gone up 700%! This is alarming, but divorce has become a very accepted deviant in today’s society. Of course there are some very rare times where there is abuse in the marriage and the spouse must leave because they are in fear of their life, and I am not referring to those instances. I feel that more often than not divorce is looked at as an “easy out...

Words: 344 - Pages: 2

Alienation and Anomie

...Comparison and Contrast of Theories of Karl Marx, Max Weber and Émile Durkheim. While influence on modern social science can be traced to many revolutionary figures, perhaps none had greater influence on modern social science than three social theorists/sociologists, Karl Marx and Émile Durkheim who have been known as principle architects of modern social science. Although modern theory of sociology was founded by Max Webber and Émile Durkheim, Karl Marx has had a profound impact on the evolution of modern sociology. Each of the three figures contributed to sociology in many ways through different approaches to social class and inequality. Many might argue that there are similarities between these sociologists’ theories and that they examined ideas that were similar; however, they all came to different conclusions. Karl Marx was influenced by political economists who believed that the cost of production was determined by the amount of labor. Along with these and other influences, Karl Marx approached social problems and inequalities through his theory of alienation, which focuses on separation of things that naturally belong together. Marx’s theory further describes estrangement of individuals from their human nature as results a society divided into social classes. Karl Marx argued that class is decided by ownership or non-ownership of production. He also saw class as having connection to the means of production while Max weber’s idea of alienation is based on the......

Words: 504 - Pages: 3

Differences Between Anomie, Differential Association and Social Control Theories

...The significant difference between the three theories is the scope of extent measured by cultural norms, influence and association, which defines criminal behaviors of individuals. A key requisite to the social control theory requires an individual’s attachment and connection, developing a social bond that would mold a ‘behavior’ in support of a group’s morals. An example would be a population like Singapore, shaped by governance, cultural and social bonds that keeps people from committing deviant acts otherwise known as criminal behaviors. The social control theory suggests that individuals learn to abide to such behavior as a society norm. Differential association theory studies the immediate environment and social circle of an individual. Sociologists believe that three key contributing factors – influence, people association, and environment; promotes deviant behavior as a ‘justified’ behavior. The differential association theory can also be applied to a minority of outcasts who clearly deviates away from the society norms of the majority (social control theory) but thrive in the unique culture guarded with strong influences and associations. An example would be a secret society formed by a small group of activists that has its own cultural beliefs and school of thoughts that does not conform to the majority of the population. The differential association theory suggests that individuals learn deviance from strong influences such as parents or teachers, and the......

Words: 378 - Pages: 2

Durkheims Theory of Division of Labour

...Essay on Durkheim’s Theory of Division of Labour by Sikandar Khan Essay on Durkheim’s Theory of Division of Labour – Durkheim’s “Theory of Division of Labour” is often regarded as his major contribution to the field of sociological thought. Durkheim’s doctoral thesis, “Division of Labour in Society” – 1.893, is his first major book. In this, the influence of Auguste Comte is clearly evident. The theme of this book is the relationship between individuals and society or the collectivity. It is indeed a classic study of social solidarity. In this book he reacted against the view that modern industrial society could be based simply upon agreement between individuals motivated by self-interest and without any prior consensus. He agreed that the kind of consensus in modern society was different from that in simpler social systems. But he saw both of these as two types of social solidarity. In his famous work “The Division of Labour in Society” Durkheim tried to determine the social consequences of the division of labour in modern societies. A major theme in all Durkheim’s writings is the importance of shared social norms and values in maintaining social cohesion and solidarity. He argued that the nature of this social solidarity depends on the extent of the division of labour. Meaning of Division of Labour: The concept of “Division of Labour” has been used in three ways: (i) in the sense of the technical division of labour, it describes the production......

Words: 1936 - Pages: 8

Subcultural Theory

...Using material from item A and elsewhere, assess the usefulness of sub cultural theories in explaining “sub cultural crime and deviance” in society. Functionalist sociologists adopt a normative definition to explain crime and deviance. They categorise it as something which breaks off from or violates social norms. This means that there is an assumption that society is based on value consensus and thus laws reflect the interests and views of the majority of the population. On the other hand critical criminology such as Marxism would use the relativistic definition to define crime and thus support the notion that the law reflects the interests of the ruling class instead. One sub cultural theory which is useful in explaining sub cultural crime and deviance is Merton’s strain theory. He argued that in society, certain members may experience a strain between the cultural goals of society for example the American dream and the legitimate means to achieve these goals. Deviance results from the structure of society and reaching these goals depends on an individual’s social mobility. In a stratified society goals are inevitably linked to a person’s position in the social structure. As a result, when some members are unable to achieve goals they become disenchanted and may seek out alternative ways. Merton argued that capitalist societies suffer from anomie - a strain/conflict between the goals set by society and the legitimate (law abiding) means of achieving them. However, Merton...

Words: 1241 - Pages: 5

Alienation vs Anomie

...Abdulkadir Öncel Suleyman Sah University Sociology ALIENATION AND ANOMIE Throughout the history many sociologists tried to analyze society and societal relations, also sociologists have still continued to study society and its problems. In the some problems, sociologists studied in minority individuals’ issue with small groups then they generalized the solution or analyzes for the majority who lives in same conditions. Because even you study society, you would need individualistic framework to understanding disharmony and problems of folk in daily life. Also it is impossible to study with all people in society. Because of that you should understand that what disturbs person? You could not understand whether being harmony or happiness between people with continuity of production or maintaining work of daily life. Therefore, sociologists anatomize into social action and relationship between all people. But primarily you should know the human nature and its structures and its needing. Each analyzes would be lacking without involving human factors whereupon also Karl Marx and Emile Durkheim first of all examined people, their structures, their desires and their connections with the nature. Then they tried to understand society with this way and put in the picture at the back of events. Not only relationship people and nature but also relationship between people is important for Marx and Durkheim who interested in people’s station in society and they searched answer for some......

Words: 2570 - Pages: 11

Usefulness of Functionalist Theory

...Evaluate the usefulness of Functionalist theories to our understanding of crime and deviance (40 marks) A functionalist analysis of crime and deviance begins with society as a whole. It looks for the source of deviance in the nature of society rather than in the individual. Durkheim argued that crime is an inevitable and normal aspect of social life. Crime is present in all types of society; indeed, the crime rate is higher in the more advanced, industrialised countries. According to Durkheim, crime is an ‘integral part of all healthy societies’. It’s inevitable because not every member of society can be equally committed to the collective sentiments (the shared values and moral beliefs) of society. Since individuals are exposed to different influences and circumstances, it is ‘impossible for all to be alike’. Therefore not everyone is equally reluctant to break the law. Durkheim went on to say that crime isn’t only inevitable, it can also be functional. Durkheim argued that it only becomes dysfunctional (harmful to society) when its rate is unusually high or law. He argued that all social change begins with some form of deviance. In order for change to occur, yesterday’s deviance must become today’s normality. Since a certain amount of change is good for society (so that it can progress rather than stagnate), so is deviance. If the collective sentiments are too strong, there will be little deviance, but neither will there be any change, or progress. Therefore the......

Words: 1325 - Pages: 6

Functionalist Theories of Crime and Deviance

...FUNCTIONALIST THEORIES OF C+D Emile Durkheim: 1. C+D is functional Durkheim believed that a certain amount of c+d could be positive for society. -Necessary to generate social change – innovation only arises when old ideas are challenged. -Helps to clarify the boundaries of acceptable behaviour following social reactions to deviance eg drugs. -Creates social integration as it bonds society together against criminals eg 9/11 and 7/7. 2. C+D is dysfunctional Durkheim believed that crime and deviance also acts as a threat to society. This is because the norms and values that ‘unite’ society are being challenged, thus threatening consensus, social order and stability. 3. Cause of C+D Durkheim believed that C+D occurred as a result of anomie (normlessness). He believed that this could occur during periods of rapid social change eg revolutions when people become unsure of what society’s norms and values are. 4. Social order and social control Durkheim believed that there’s an agreement/consensus over norms and values, resulting in social order and stable societies. He believed that this was due to social control, a positive thing, creating social cohesion. He believed social control was achieved by agencies who socialise individuals into norms and values by integrating them into school, instilling core norms and values. Religion binds people together during times of happiness and sadness, and regulates behaviour. Parsons argued that sickness may be......

Words: 801 - Pages: 4

The Strain Theory

...The Strain Theory Professor Jaske CRM 3407 15 February 2016 Thus, the Social Learning Theory appears to be the best theory to explain how people of different cultures and origins are able to co-exist in a ship since the theory gives credibility to the ability of people to live cordially as they learn a particular living environment or system. The Strain Theory does an excellent job of explaining white collar crime, along with the contextual anomie/ strain theory. While examining this theory, it was discovered as the most compelling in our constant battle with white collar and corporate crimes. Ever since the beginning of recorded history man/woman has tried to achieve a better life, but not much has changed in today’s standards, since it can be said it is more now than ever. From television, and radio we see the American dream of home ownership, the ability to fit into the society with the latest gadgets. At the same time trying to further their education has its roots in the American dream of more pay, a better job, and the ability to retire all these things is associated with the American dream of more money. While reading this theory I took a closer look into what fuels the human mind in our society. White collar crime in most cases, according to the Strain Theory and my own beliefs is what fuel the human desire to be successful. Greed has always and always will be a driving force in our society, I see no relief in sight unless we as a society find some way......

Words: 911 - Pages: 4

Using Merton's Strains Towards Anomie to Explain Youngers' Behavior in Umbrella Revolution

...youngsters’ participation in the umbrella movement can be explained by Merton’s strains towards anomie theory. To answer such question, it would be required to consider and descript few key terms stated in the question, followed by the linkages and applicability between those terms with detailed justification and draw proper conclusion at last. I tentatively would say yes to the given question before making my deeper explanation. Merton’s anomie theory composes three elements including cultural structures, social structure and anomie. Taken together, the mismatch between cultural structure and social structure and strains towards anomie on part of individual form two conditions for anomie (Merton, 1938). Beside Merton’s theory, it is crucial to define what youngsters’ participation and umbrella movement stand for. A random poll conducted in Central, Mong Kok and Causeway Bay during 20 to 26 of October 2014 showed that 61% of participants in the umbrella movement was under 29 years old (Cheng and Yuen, 2014). Therefore, Youngsters’ participation in the umbrella movement may refer to students or those aged below 29, while this was a youngster-led protest movement, which aimed at changing Hong Kong’s Chief Executive election system, initiated by classes boycotts and assumed as an unauthorized and illegal protest. The focus of the discussion would then lay on how Merton’s strains towards anomie theory can be applied on youngsters’ participation in the umbrella......

Words: 1629 - Pages: 7

Merton's Strain Theory

...Rudee Reyes SOC 408 In order to illustrate how biological theories of criminal behavior came up short in showing social reality, Robert Merton proposed his strain theory. He realized that every society and culture sets forth goals that every member should meet, and dictates the legitimate means of achieving those goals. So Merton argued that structural conditions needed to be considered as influencing deviation from behavior considered as normative. He referred to Durkheim’s concept of anomie, but understood it as the pressure, or strain, that an individual experiences based on two conditions. First, an individual may experience strain when institutional means of achieving culturally defined goals do not necessarily lead to attainment of those goals. Second, an individual may also experience strain when access to the institutional means of achieving culturally defined goals is completely blocked off. In his theory, Merton describes five different ways that individuals adjust to the strains they experience (Merton pg. 233). These categories explain how individuals adapt under the conditions of strain resulting from anomie. The first category is conformist, in which the individuals believe in both the goals set forth by their culture and the institutional means of achieving those goals (Merton pg. 234). These people strive for their culture’s goals of success by following the prescribed means of achieving them. An example of this would be college students because they......

Words: 1028 - Pages: 5

Theory of Theory

...Modern Times and Marxist Criticism Marxist Criticism revolves around the theories and ideologies of Karl Marx. While his work is still commonly studied and referenced, I have found some of his principles to be outdated. Marx lived from 1818 until 1883, so, his principles are based on what was going on during his lifetime. In nearly two hundred years, some ideologies of Marxist Criticism don’t fit the social norm as well as they did in his time. Ideologies such as religion, consumerism, and rugged individualism have grown with society and don’t have the same effect as they once did. In Marxist Criticism you will find one of Marx’s ideologies to be religion. Religion is an ideology that helps to keep the poor satisfied with their lot in life, or at least tolerant of it, as a tranquilizer might do. (Tyson, 59) With religion being a major part of many people’s life in the 1800’s his view on its role in society as the “opiate of the masses” is different now that it is the twenty-first century than it was during the nineteenth century. In centuries prior religion would include the conviction that the poor, if they remain nonviolent, will find their reward in heaven. (Tyson, 59) While that ideology was extremely relevant in Marx’s time, religion today isn’t a requirement, it isn’t expected thus making it outdated. While religion is still widespread, it has become common to not be religious at all. A growing number of people are identifying as Atheist or Agnostic, choosing......

Words: 1098 - Pages: 5